On Tuesday 09 July 2002 04.10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been a grateful user of latencytest for audio setup.
I've just started working for the Open Source Development Lab
(www.osdl.org) which is a non-profit supporting kernel development
by providing hardware and a Scalable Test Platform
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:27:25 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 12:21:59 +0100, Richard W.E. Furse wrote:
I've put a provisional version of the LADSPA SDK including the LADSPA v1.1
header file at
http://www.ladspa.org/ladspa_sdk_dev.tgz
said it then, will say it
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Vincent Touquet wrote:
RTC is still more accurate, but on the other hand, you don't need root
privileges to take advantage of the 1kHz ticks!
can't wait till 2.6 hits the streets :)
Kernel space only; userspace is still at 100Hz on x86
-Paul
--
Nottingham,
We are looking for people who are interested in submitting user
documentation to the Quicktoots project.
http://www.boosthardware.com/LAU/quicktoots/
The purpose of the Quicktoots are to provide a community resource of
informative guides for using Linux audio applications.
The Quicktoots are
Hi,
I understand your objections, but I think the alternatives (that keep
binary compatibility) are just as bad in there own way.
Is binary compatibility really an issue right now? We have swh plugins,
cmt plugins, what
else?
It's all open source, so just recompile it.
Cheers, Alex
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Paul Sladen wrote:
RTC is still more accurate, but on the other hand, you don't need root
privileges to take advantage of the 1kHz ticks!
Kernel space only; userspace is still at 100Hz on x86
Not a problem. Timing sensitive user-space apps benefit from this change
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
Not a problem. Timing sensitive user-space apps benefit from this change
because with 1kHz ticks, kernel will be making scheduling decisions much
more often.
The solution to a lot of these scheduling problems (non-RT) is firm
timers:
