Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and TiMidity++

2002-09-19 Thread David Olofson
On Thursday 19 September 2002 20.07, Peter L Jones wrote: [...] > > An alternative is to make > > TiMidity++ a jack client, and then you can pipe jack output to an > > LADSPA network if you wish, via maybe ardour. > > That's fine if you're controlling TiMidity++ etc from a PC - but > how do I fix

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and TiMidity++

2002-09-19 Thread David Olofson
On Thursday 19 September 2002 05.10, Likai Liu wrote: > My response to all above discussion about LADSPA and TiMidity++, > > I've been playing with TiMidity++ for a while, and hacked it a bit > as well. For what I think, given the complexity of internals, it is > not worth making TiMidity++ an LAD

Re: [linux-audio-dev] porting supercollider

2002-09-19 Thread Paul Davis
>audio "device". Since the OS X version of SC likely uses CoreAudio (a >callback-based library) and since the source for prior versions is >unavailable, you may be able to do the port of the audio engine >straightforwardly. FWIW, AFAIK, SC has always been written around an interrupt+callback des

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: SysEx interface for softsynths [was Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and TiMidity++]

2002-09-19 Thread John Lazzaro
> I didn't see a way to contact them via email, otherwise I would inquire > as to how to proceed in getting an ID. http://www.midi.org/about-mma/mfr_id_app.pdf - John Lazzaro -- Research Specialist -- CS Division -- EECS --

[linux-audio-dev] Re: SysEx interface for softsynths [was Re: [linux-audio-dev]LADSPA and TiMidity++]

2002-09-19 Thread Josh Green
On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 12:55, Richard Bown wrote: > On Wednesday 18 September 2002 19:41, Josh Green wrote: > > > I wonder how one would go about creating such a standard? Would we > > need to obtain a Manufacturer's ID for our SysEx standard? If we can > > find an existing standard we could just

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and TiMidity++

2002-09-19 Thread Peter L Jones
On Thursday 19 Sep 2002 04:10, Likai Liu wrote: > I've been playing with TiMidity++ for a while, and hacked it a bit as > well. For what I think, given the complexity of internals, it is not > worth making TiMidity++ an LADSPA host and having to add some TiMidity++ > specific MIDI controller event

Re: [linux-audio-dev] porting supercollider

2002-09-19 Thread Will Benton
Ross-- The OSS interface will be similar to what you're used to, but you don't want to use it. :-) There are tutorials on the www.alsa-project.org page, including one that uses a callback-based style (which is what you want). However, as Paul has hinted, the best way to proceed with an SC port

[linux-audio-dev] porting supercollider

2002-09-19 Thread Ross Clement
Hi. Thanks of the responses (I only just got the linux-audio-dev digest). As some people have noticed, my queries are at an early stage. No, I don't yet know too much about the way that the SC code works. (i) Yes, the gui is going to be the major problem. However, while I have only used the demo

[linux-audio-dev] [ANN]: New version of RTMix 0.48 now available for download

2002-09-19 Thread ico
Apologies if this is not going onto the right mailing list. I am mailing this from the ICMC2002 conference in Europe and am unable to have long-term access to the Internet, so I apologize if this has been posted in the wrong place. Anyhow, I would like to announce immediate availability of RTMi

Re: [linux-audio-dev] HDSP + cardbus

2002-09-19 Thread D R Holsbeck
Hmm I guess Ill respond to myself ;-) So I started doing some more digging. No matter how I load modules, reboot, update source code, or click my heels, I can not get a decent audio output using the cardbus interface. Unfortunatly our control room, where my pci interface resides, has been too bus

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Basic information

2002-09-19 Thread Alexander Ehlert
Hi, > because its far from clear that this is the right thing to do with an > SC port. if you don't know what SC is, you might not realize that the Yeah, anyway, I was not pointing in direction of SC, I thought he's interested in sound programming in general. Cheers, Alex

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Basic information

2002-09-19 Thread Paul Davis
>>> Hi. Could anyone point me to some very basic information to give me >>> some >>> idea of programming for sound in linux. >> >> we can't even begin to answer such a nebulous question i'm afraid. > >why not? I would just start to have a look at other sound applications >and >try to understand

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Basic information

2002-09-19 Thread Alexander Ehlert
Hi, >> Hi. Could anyone point me to some very basic information to give me >> some >> idea of programming for sound in linux. > > we can't even begin to answer such a nebulous question i'm afraid. why not? I would just start to have a look at other sound applications and try to understand what

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Basic information

2002-09-19 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:08:16 +0100 (BST) Ross Clement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. Could anyone point me to some very basic information to give me some > idea of programming for sound in linux. > > I have previously programmed sound on Silicon Graphics machines and > Sun machines. The olde

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Basic information

2002-09-19 Thread Paul Davis
>Hi. Could anyone point me to some very basic information to give me some >idea of programming for sound in linux. we can't even begin to answer such a nebulous question i'm afraid. >I have previously programmed sound on Silicon Graphics machines and >Sun machines. > >I'm thinking about linux i

[linux-audio-dev] Basic information

2002-09-19 Thread Ross Clement
Hi. Could anyone point me to some very basic information to give me some idea of programming for sound in linux. I have previously programmed sound on Silicon Graphics machines and Sun machines. I'm thinking about linux in the context of *possibly* building a cross- compiler (source code to sou