linux-audio-dev'ers,
I am working in an Operations Center where we want to record 16-20 separate
analog audio voice nets/channels along with a few ethernet-based
display-data(not video) streams and play them all back individually,
selectively or all together for training purposes.
The audio nets
Perhaps old news but I saw these interesting USB MIDI master keyboards
http://www.harmony-central.com/Newp/2002/PCR-30-PCR-50.html
I'm considering getting one so my questions are:
- What's the status of USB MIDI on Linux ? Are such kind of keyboards fully
supported ? (eg transmit all the params
Welcome Ron!
In fact it's easy: just take the source code and hack it into a VST/Dx
plugin. Just don't forget to release the result's source code as GPL or LGPL
dependng of the original licence of the Linux plugin :-).
See how OSS is a better world yet? ;-)
(had to answer that ;-)).
Sebastien
--
Paul Davis wrote:
> Whoa! Someone's paying attention! We love you Ron! When can we get
> Sonar on Linux? :))
Hey, thanks! I actually only subscribed to this list about a week ago...
trying to keep on top what's going on in the world.
When can I get some Linux plugs on Windows? :-) (Had to say
Steve Harris wrote:
>> http://quitte.de/spectral-evolution.gif
>
>Excellent. Can you either stick the data somewhere, or build a
>signal-amplitude x harmonic-amplitude table from it?
>
>What windowing function did you use? Do you know if the shape varies with
>the frequency of the fundamental? It
>> at what point do you expect Digidesign TDM plugins
>> to fall by the wayside?
>
>DigiDesign may be the special case here, assuming that
>Avid stays independent -- the ProTools business model
>offers them refuge from consolidation forces, being
>hardware-restricted and embraced by the high end.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:05:12 +0100, Tim Goetze wrote:
> and we need quite a few. i've created an image of the spectral
> evolution of an ~500 Hz sine from inaudible to full distortion:
>
> http://quitte.de/spectral-evolution.gif
Excellent. Can you either stick the data somewhere, or build a
s
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 01:34:55PM -0800, John Lazzaro wrote:
> Adobe). I use "likely" as a relative term -- the
> hardware-centric nature of Avid makes it an
> unnatural fit for both of those companies ...
On the other hand, microsoft doesn't seem to mind selling
hardware these days. xbox any
> Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> at what point do you expect Digidesign TDM plugins
> to fall by the wayside?
DigiDesign may be the special case here, assuming that
Avid stays independent -- the ProTools business model
offers them refuge from consolidation forces, being
hardware-restricted and
Steve Harris wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 05:21:08 -0800, Bill Schottstaedt wrote:
>> > there's one problem i see: if we employ a chebyshev, it is going
>> > to create harmonics no matter what amplitude our incoming signal
>> > [...]
>> > it seems hard to come up with a wave shaper that favours
>support one new or existing standard, that Microsoft licenses
>freely to all comers (with an anti-GPL poison pill). Then we're
>back to familiar territory, Microsoft owning one way to
>do it, Apple owning a second way to do it, and everyone else
>supporting one or both. The natural reason to exp
> Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> its finally dawning on some people that whatever
> benefits specific plugin APIs bring to particular products and
> hardware, the proliferation of them is actually *more* harmful. i am
> skeptical that anyone in the commercial side of things really has t
>We should organize a meeting with the cakewalk guy and other grups
>with a proposal.. We could develop some draft here in the lad
>groups and invite other open groups to participate too
>(openal, beos advocates, etc). An open, cross platform plugin/routing api
>could sure give us a huge boost!
yo
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:14:59 -0500
Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Kuper, VP of Engineering at Cakewalk writes, on vst-plugins:
>
> --
> That said, we would welcome any effort to unify
> VST/DirectX/DMO/OPT/MFX/ReWire
Ron Kuper, VP of Engineering at Cakewalk writes, on vst-plugins:
--
That said, we would welcome any effort to unify
VST/DirectX/DMO/OPT/MFX/ReWire/TDM/RTAS/MAS/AU/JACK/LADSPA/... ad-infinitum
into a single cross-platform plugin AP
Hi,
yesterday I released ecasound-2.2.0-pre4 (approaching
next stable release, yay!), which has a few JACK-specific
improvements:
- new command-line syntax for specifying inputs and
outputs, see:
http://www.wakkanet.fi/~kaiv/ecasound/Documentation/users_guide/html_uguide/users_guide.html#S
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 05:21:08 -0800, Bill Schottstaedt wrote:
> > there's one problem i see: if we employ a chebyshev, it is going
> > to create harmonics no matter what amplitude our incoming signal
> > [...]
> > it seems hard to come up with a wave shaper that favours higher
> > harmonics,[...
Hi,
the development tree of the latest TiMidity++ was moved onto
sourceforge now.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/timidity/
there is a cvs branch, "R2_12_0_pre1b", which includes bunch of
enhancement patches. the patches sent on the timidity developer ML
(in japanese) are (occasionally)
> >It would be more efficient to just calculate the corect chebyshev in
> >realtime, the problem is that they have lienar CPU cost with the number of
> >harmonics, 20 harmonics for example will be pretty expensive.
>
> there's one problem i see: if we employ a chebyshev, it is going
> to create har
Martin Wolters wrote:
I just added myself and it looks a little funky - the address appears
twice. And then I realized that I can't change the record. Is that
intentional? For example: I am moving soon. How do I change the address?
Send you an email?
Patrick is just coding the editing section.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:30:48 +0100, Tim Goetze wrote:
> i've been mucking around a little but it seems real hard to
> make the harmonics fit, especially with such a wide range of
> possible mixes being aimed at.
Yup. Hey, if it was easy, everyone would be doing it ;)
> >I was planning to
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:30:53 -0800, Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:30:48PM +0100, Tim Goetze wrote:
> > it seems hard to come up with a wave shaper that favours higher
> > harmonics, i've tried some in the past few days.
>
> maybe you're not filtering enough?
Thats definatl
> PS: I suggest to go into planning mode for a while in order to sort out
> things a bit and lay out an elegant design concept in order to avoid
> the usual spaghetti code projects.
>
> thoughts ?
>
There's nothing i'd like to do more than joining this project! I'm sure
all the fellow audio
23 matches
Mail list logo
