Re: [linux-audio-dev] OT: amp modeling

2002-12-03 Thread Will Benton
On Sunday, December 1, 2002, at 10:31 AM, Tim Goetze wrote: from my spice investigations, i doubt you can get a real valve sound from solid state electronics, the way it shapes the signal is quite unique. I wonder how the SansAmp does it, then? hmm. maybe I will have to buy one and take it

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

2002-12-03 Thread Conrad Parker
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:58:29PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote: > > From: Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > If you're going to support metadata, support the Dublin Core, but generally > > extrnal metadata is better than internal. Just provide a unique ID and > > metadata can refer to that. > > F

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

2002-12-03 Thread David Olofson
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 22.58, Tim Hockin wrote: [...unique IDs...] > Maybe I > can be convinced - a few people chided in on this point - can > anyone tell me WHY? Well, a guaranteed unique ID is really rather handy when you want to load up a project on another system and be *sure* that you'r

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

2002-12-03 Thread Tim Hockin
I'm replying to all the replies in one email, hope no one minds :) > From: Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Fisrt off, I agree with Conrad, its better to make this fucused on, and > really good at, one task (ie. instruments), that be OK at lots of things. Agreed withone exception - It is mean

Re: [linux-audio-dev] smpte generating code

2002-12-03 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 15:28:44 -0500 Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i know that someone posted smpte-reading code here last year. does > anyone have any pointers to source code to generate smpte? Paul, I think I had some. Its on backup media somewhere. Gimme a couple of days to dig it up a

[linux-audio-dev] smpte generating code

2002-12-03 Thread Paul Davis
i know that someone posted smpte-reading code here last year. does anyone have any pointers to source code to generate smpte? --p

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

2002-12-03 Thread David Olofson
(Commenting on my own reply. Just thinking too much as usual. :-) > > > /* > > >* create: instantiate the plugin > > > > Maybe better to stiuck to LADSPA nomenclature? It might not be > > perfect, but it would avoid confusion. > > Here's another idea (from Audiality): > > typedef enum > { >

[linux-audio-dev] LAD Meeting at ZKM, Karlsruhe/Germany 14.-16. March 2003

2002-12-03 Thread Dr. Matthias Nagorni
This summer some of us met at the LAD booth at Linuxtag in Karlsruhe, Germany. Since the participants of this meeting enjoyed it very much, we discussed about meeting again in spring 2003. Frank Neumann and I had the idea of asking the "Zentrum fuer Kunst und Medientechnologie", Karlsruhe/Germany

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

2002-12-03 Thread David Olofson
(Steve has made some good points that I agree with mostly, so I chose to comment on his reply.) On Tuesday 03 December 2002 12.54, Steve Harris wrote: > Fisrt off, I agree with Conrad, its better to make this fucused on, > and really good at, one task (ie. instruments), that be OK at lots > of th

[linux-audio-dev] dev help requested

2002-12-03 Thread ljp
hello, I am writing a audio recording app for linux pdas, of the zaurus sort. I am running into a problem with switching sampling rates on the target device, and need some help to find a work around for a buggy driver, which I have no control over, as it's shipped with the device, and is not a k

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

2002-12-03 Thread Steve Harris
Fisrt off, I agree with Conrad, its better to make this fucused on, and really good at, one task (ie. instruments), that be OK at lots of things. On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 04:03:18 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote: > /* forward declarations of the fundamental OAPI types */ > typedef struct OAPI_descriptor

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

2002-12-03 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 01:11:11 -0800 (PST) Tim Hockin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Before I dig too far into your code - do you want me to try to steer it > towards my own ideas, or would you rather we just use JACK to each do what > we do well and still play together? Thats the way. I don't think i

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

2002-12-03 Thread Tim Hockin
> >I know there are probably other people who are writing similar apps. If we > >have similar goals, I'd be happy to collaborate instead. > > > >Thanks for the time. I'm tired of waiting for new versions of Windows music > >apps, only to find the features I want STILL not implemented. Linux need