Thanks for your reply!
Personally, I am rather against the Apple's layout and "usability ideas"
(for that matter I am also against the KDE's outdated "usability
guidelines" as well) since it has proven to be nothing but a nightmare
for the computer illiterate (or barely literate) students whom I t
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:40:53AM +, Dave Griffiths wrote:
> http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/macosx/Essentials/AquaHIGuidelines/
>
> I think as linux developers, we could find something similar very handy -
> especially if it was toolkit agnostic. Has anyone heard of something
> like this
I might be a bit OT here, but this is always interesting for interface design:
http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/macosx/Essentials/AquaHIGuidelines/
Not saying I agree with it all, but details like the layout of buttons
on dialog boxes on this page are interesting:
http://developer.apple.com/tec
hi ico,
i'm seriously interested in looking at the user-friendliness issue as im
working on a library of pixmaps (png) that developers can use for their
apps... this came from the whole discussion about why we need graphic
designers ;-)
i've downloaded RTMix and will have a good look at it i
"Ivica Bukvic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I e-mailed the list a couple of days ago asking for some advice
> regarding my RTMix app ("how to make it more user-friendly"). I am still
> waiting for some help on this one :-D. Again, any insight is greatly
> appreciated!
OK, here goes.
My insigh
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 06:21:42PM +0100, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> >and the rest ... I get this. Its pathetic. Not only that ... I have no
> >idea how much longer I can keep working on Ardour right now because
> >working on it has come close to exhausting my financial
> >resources.
>
> Paul, coul
I e-mailed the list a couple of days ago asking for some advice
regarding my RTMix app ("how to make it more user-friendly"). I am still
waiting for some help on this one :-D. Again, any insight is greatly
appreciated!
Sincerely,
P.S. Web server hosting my page is still down, thanks to the "smart
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 12:33:24PM -0500, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
>Do I/we have at least your permission (if we do manage to compile out of
>CVS) to redistribute my/our compiled version?
I think this is covered by section 6 in the GPL:
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
6. Each time you redistribu
On 13 Feb 2003 01:38:13 +1100
Son of Zev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However I have been involved in the ardour lists for over 2 years. I
> have spent much time reading about potential problems and responded to
> all those that have had the courtesy to respond. I have also learnt and
> spent much
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 09:49, Paul Davis wrote:
> >If you are interested, I am sure people would pay for binaries of
> >ardour.I would. I know other musicans that would.I could get more
> >musicans to. Personally, I have been waiting for it since I first heard
> >about it. Why not release something?
>Do I/we have at least your permission (if we do manage to compile out of
>CVS) to redistribute my/our compiled version?
i would prefer that nobody be using ardour at this time that doesn't
have the skills to use CVS and the compilation toolset. there are
frequently daily updates, and i'd much rat
they did this against my wishes. i have asked several distributions to
stop doing this, including suse. this being the gpl, there's not much
more i can do.
--p
> when ardour is in a state where i believe (rightly or wrongly) that a
> reasonably typical target user can sit down and just use it without
> encountering bugs when recording a typical 12-32 track piece, there
> will be binaries.
>
> --p
Do I/we have at least your permission (if we do manage to
~> rpm -q ardour-cvs20020816-21
ardour-cvs20020816-21
roger@jeloin:~> man rpm
Reformatting rpm(8), please wait...
Still saving the page, please wait...
roger@jeloin:~> rpm -q ardour-cvs20020816-21 -i
Name: ardour Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : cvs2002081
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:49:08AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
(cut)
>jazz++ has been around for a long time, and is available as a
>binary. why isn't it widely loved and used? because it really isn't
>very good. i know that i tried to use it many times, and found it,
>well, frankly i found it complet
>and the rest ... I get this. Its pathetic. Not only that ... I have no
>idea how much longer I can keep working on Ardour right now because
>working on it has come close to exhausting my financial
>resources.
Paul, could you tell me how I can support you financially ?
Do you work through Paypal
>If you are interested, I am sure people would pay for binaries of
>ardour.I would. I know other musicans that would.I could get more
>musicans to. Personally, I have been waiting for it since I first heard
>about it. Why not release something?
because i am tired of downloading open source projec
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 07:44, Paul Davis wrote:
> >So I've wasted 2+ years of my life and countless dollars continuing down
> >this path.
>
> Do you know how much of my life and money I've spent "continuing down
> this path"? In return for getting up every day for 3+ years (bar some
> months in the
-Forwarded Message-
From: Son of Zev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Alsa-dev <
Thanks Vincent.
Your reply is appreciated.
However I have been involved in the ardour lists for over 2 years. I
have spent much time reading about potential problems and responded to
all thos
Thanks Vincent.
Your reply is appreciated.
However I have been involved in the ardour lists for over 2 years. I
have spent much time reading about potential problems and responded to
all those that have had the courtesy to respond. I have also learnt and
spent much time investigating problems th
>I have done everything I have asked of me from the list, including
>Paul's responses ..and also taken my own initiatives following lack of
>response and still have recieved no response.
[ ... ]
>Aside from being upset, it appears to me that you guys are all a bunch
>of hypocrites.. Asking for
Dear Sir,
My name is William Ume,
Presently,I am working in an African country.
I got your contact via the internet and felt you may be willing to pursue this with me.
This proposal may sound strange to you or probably you may even think it is a
joke,because of lots of funny mails circulatin
>I think if (if) the Ardour developers are _expecting_ quality feedback
>from normal users (not just programmers) at this stage, they should
>provide tarballs of the stable CVS snapshots they want to be tested.
>
>But maybe they want to wait for 1.0 before letting endusers test it?
>In that case, m
I'm not a "real coder" either (so one might argue I shouldn't be on
linux-audio-dev, but I'm just interested in the discussions), so I think
I understand the root cause of your grief.
I think if (if) the Ardour developers are _expecting_ quality feedback
from normal users (not just programmers) at
Hi Guys
This is quite a disturbing message..
nearly 2 weeks ago Paul Davis marked one of my messages as something
"seriously wrong" going on .. when libraries were compiling as dynamic
not static...
since then I have responded with full outputs of what is happening.
In response I sent full
En ucuz lensler icin lutfen tiklayin.
Bir telefonla adrese teslim.
http://www.akdenizgoz.com
Akdeniz Goz Merkezi
Fevzipaþa No:73 Fatih0 212 635 74 74
Listeden cikmak icin [EMAIL PROTECTED]adresine bos mail gonderiniz
26 matches
Mail list logo
