On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:58:56 -0500, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Hi,
Some of your ideas already reside in other projects, so perhaps consider
contributing to them rather than starting yet another project. IMHO what
we really need now in Linux community is a couple of really stable and
versatile
Think this needs to go to LAD too...
--- Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there was one more too, but I can't think what it was...
I remember one about sidechains or something. I don't know what a sidechain is,
though, I just recall seeing it somewhere :)
I agree
Apologies, guys and girls, for the german posting...
thanks, tobias.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 08:18:02PM +0100, David Olofson wrote:
On Thursday 27 February 2003 07.47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
There's only one call; process(). (Or run(), as some prefer to
call it.) This is called once for each block, whether or not the
plugin processes audio.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 06:53:02PM +0100, Dr. Matthias Nagorni wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Frank Barknecht wrote:
See http://footils.org/cgi-bin/cms/pydiddy/LinuxSoundNight
Thanks Frank, this WIKI is a very good idea. I added the equipment I
intend to bring (anybody curious ?). We should
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 06:26:08PM -0600, Arthur Peters wrote:
I have been working on an audio processing/synthesis application that
should have the power of Reason and Buzz plus the ability to be used
effectivly in live proformance. Some of you may have read my earlier
emails on this subject.
Roger Larsson writes:
I try to list some pro / con for call back and push APIs:
push API:
Pro:
* simple to play a single file, basically a copy from source file to
destination.
Con:
* hard to write plugins that way. Take a look at arts plugins. They all have
a
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:07:18 +, Mike Rawes wrote:
Think this needs to go to LAD too...
Er, yeah, I didn't realise it wasn't.
I think there was one more too, but I can't think what it was...
I remember one about sidechains or something. I don't know what a sidechain is,
though, I
Paul Davis writes:
From the 2.5.63 changelog:
o POSIX clocks timers
Phat :)
Super-Callifragilistic-Expealido-phat-cious!!
finally, we can do real MIDI sequencing with Linux:
while (1) {
...
usleep (usecs_till_next_event);
/* we're know
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:49:59 +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Is this really new ? I was porting some C++ thread classes (originally
developed for Solaris) to 2.4.19 this week. The ITC mechanism uses
pthread_cond_timedwait(), which takes a struct timespec * referring to
an absolute time, the
Roger Larsson writes:
This can easily be avoided by making these 'free-running' threads wait
on an event that has the right frequency, e.g. a counting semaphore
that is incremented by the output module each time a block is processed.
This way you can eleminate all buffering between the
Steve Harris writes:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:49:59 +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Is this really new ? I was porting some C++ thread classes (originally
developed for Solaris) to 2.4.19 this week. The ITC mechanism uses
pthread_cond_timedwait(), which takes a struct timespec *
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:51:07 +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
The thread that calls the user's callback function is completely
hidden, and so it can wait only for the trigger form jackd and nothing
else. As a consequence you can't use it to communicate safely with your
callback which would be
On Friday 28 February 2003 09.20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
random latency ? how do you mean that ?
Latency depends on how you happen to construct the net (order of
instantiation, connections etc) and/or the actual layout of the net,
in non-obvious ways.
When designing a net, it should
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 22:47, Dave Phillips wrote:
Just what I needed to know, thank you. I did download 2.5.63 and
successfully built it. The new configuration GUI was a surprise, but
otherwise it was all straightforward stuff. Nice to see ALSA there
(along with the message that OSS is
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:05:19 +0100
David Olofson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 February 2003 09.20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
random latency ? how do you mean that ?
Latency depends on how you happen to construct the net (order of
instantiation, connections etc) and/or the
Mike Rawes wrote on Fri, 28-Feb-2003:
/* Hint MOMENTARY indicates that that a control should behave like a
momentary switch, such as a reset or sync control. LADSPA_HINT_MOMENTARY
may only be used in combination with LADSPA_HINT_TOGGLED. */
#define LADSPA_HINT_MOMENTARY 0x40
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Paul Winkler hat gesagt: // Paul Winkler wrote:
Guitar effects on a microphone is very hard to manage without uncontrollable
feedback. But I saw it done - on a saxophone yet! - by a trio called
Spongehead (guitar/bass, sax, and
On Friday 28 February 2003 22.01, Dave Griffiths wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:05:19 +0100
David Olofson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 February 2003 09.20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
random latency ? how do you mean that ?
Latency depends on how you happen to construct
Dave Griffiths wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:05:19 +0100
David Olofson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 February 2003 09.20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
random latency ? how do you mean that ?
Latency depends on how you happen to construct the net (order of
instantiation,
20 matches
Mail list logo
