[linux-audio-dev] Audio* Project

2003-04-06 Thread Nick
Forget it guys, I'll do it by myself. I really don't care anymore if I am the only person who ever uses it. I just wanted some tools that did what I want the way I want it. Since I can't run Rebirth on Linux I made a tool like it but not copying it. I don't want to get into trouble with them. It

Re: [linux-audio-dev] lock-free ring buffer code

2003-04-06 Thread Steve Harris
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 01:10:17PM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote: > > Sure, it will only work on architectures where 32bit reads and writes are > > atomic. > > That is not even true on all ix86 machines. At least I've seen > special memory ordering barriers used in the kernel for newer > ix86 machines

[linux-audio-dev] Waiting to hear from you.

2003-04-06 Thread Dr.Williams Okun.
Dear Sir, REQUEST ASSISTANCE/PARTNERSHIP . I am a member of a contract award and review committee .A contract already executed by a foreign firm in Africa in 1999 was over invoiced by us to the tune of $8,600,000.00 (Eight million six hundred thousand United states dollars). In the light of

Re: [linux-audio-dev] lock-free ring buffer code

2003-04-06 Thread Ingo Oeser
Hi there, On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 06:08:51PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 06:15:09 +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote: > > Now make that thread-safe and esp. thread-safe on an architecture > > with weak memory ordering and all the fun stuff. > > Sure, it will only work on architectur