By the way, Knoppix uses Debian sid, and is overall considered to be a
very good demonstration of Linux' capabilities, both in features and in
stability. I don't think it would have gotten the recognition it has, if
people would have found it buggy or unstable.
Maarten
This is a nice coincidence, because I just installed Debian Sid
('unstable') on my home workstation.
I am also a convinced Debian user, and all the servers and workstations
I administrate are Debian Woody ('stable'). Now, recently, I have seen
myself forced to install more and more backported pac
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
I have been using testing on two desktop machines and an iBook for for
up to two years now. I have never had anything break in testing and its
pretty close to the cutting edge.
I don't find testing as cutting edge as desirable, at least for some
important packages for m
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:33:06 +0200
Ismael Valladolid Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am somewhat new to Linux low-level development. I have developed for
> other UNIX systems before, and also for Windows NT and for JavaCard
> compatible smartcards.
>
> I have used (and enjoyed) D
Hi!
gmorgan is a .. Rhythm Station, an organ with auto-accompaniment and a "small"
Band in a Linux Box. Uses MIDI and the ALSA sequencer for play the rhythm
patterns. Styles, patterns , sounds, and the mixer settings, can be edited
and saved.
Program is released GNU/GPL version 2.
News on
amSynth - Analogue Modelling SYNTHesizer
http://amsynthe.sourceforge.net/amSynth
amSynth 1.0-rc4 is now available!!
Get the source code at
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/amsynthe/amSynth-1.0-rc4.tar.gz?download
Changes in this release include:
* fi
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> Matt Gerassimoff escribio el 23/07/03 19:46:
> > Try gentoo. It is the reasons you describe why I switched. I get the
> > latest updates as soon as there available. Sometimes, I can't wait and
> > just update the ebuild scripts (you'll
Matt Gerassimoff escribio el 23/07/03 19:46:
Try gentoo. It is the reasons you describe why I switched. I get the
latest updates as soon as there available. Sometimes, I can't wait and
just update the ebuild scripts (you'll read about them on the web site:
www.gentoo.org). I have since repla
for your recreation and entertainment, there is now a little write-up
about our linuxtag booth effort at
http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/eventslt2003.php3,
now featuring winfried trümper's recording of our funky little drumming
session at the social event :)
best,
jörn
--
All Members shall r
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am somewhat new to Linux low-level development. I have developed for
> other UNIX systems before, and also for Windows NT and for JavaCard
> compatible smartcards.
>
> I have used (and enjoyed) Debian for a long time as a Linux
Hi,
I am somewhat new to Linux low-level development. I have developed for
other UNIX systems before, and also for Windows NT and for JavaCard
compatible smartcards.
I have used (and enjoyed) Debian for a long time as a Linux user and for
web development. Getting into low-level development, I
Is anyone seeing problems with SCHED_FIFO thread priority and the new
threading model in the 2.5/2.6 kernel? I read that the mode isn't
supported. But it (or something that works like it) is fundamentally
important to my Linux audio application. My audio thread has gotta have
uninterrupted, top pri
I'll give it another shot then, disabling the kudzu-probing (using an Emagic
2|6 USB audio interface on the audio box, so no fancy probing necessary)...
Has anyone successfully compiled a recent 2.5 kernel using gcc 3.2-7 (Redhat
8)? I read some warnings about broken kernel optimizations with gcc
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 04:14:23PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> >From: Alfons Adriaensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >I don't have your original message with the code at hand here, so
> >this may be a false alarm. Did you think of making all pointers
> >into shared memory volatile? IIRC you
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 04:14:23PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> >From: Alfons Adriaensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >I don't have your original message with the code at hand here, so
> >this may be a false alarm. Did you think of making all pointers
> >into shared memory volatile? IIRC you are
>From: Robert Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Speaking of documentation, it is generally a good idea to visit all the big
>unix vendors for unix-programming enlightment. Well written, fresh, and very
>thorough. Not everything is 100% compatible, but close enough.
Also Silicon Graphics (www.sgi.co
>From: Alfons Adriaensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I don't have your original message with the code at hand here, so
>this may be a false alarm. Did you think of making all pointers
>into shared memory volatile? IIRC you are testing on a counter
>that is incremented by another process - such a small
Werner Johansson wrote:
Hi!
I've been doing some early 2.5 tests, but as I'm running RH8 with the Planet
on top of it there seem to be some problems actually building a 2.5 kernel
(the linked texts here mention optimization problems with the default
RH-shipped gcc as one). So far I haven't been ab
18 matches
Mail list logo
