This is something I'm wondering about as well. I'm a system administrator
for 8 linux audio workstations, and the university wants us to switch
to redhat 9 (which use ntpl) before the end of the year. If redhat9 doesnt
support SCHED_FIFO, I won't do that, and should tell the university as
soon as
The person to ask would be Fernando from CCRMA, I have an RH9 lowlat
machine, and I haven't noticed any problems, but I cant run that machine
at very low latencies anyway due to soundcard suckiness.
I think I would have noticed if SCHED_FIFO was just ignored.
- Steve
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at
All,
I haven't used kernel 2.5/2.6 for any audio stuff yet. I'm at the Linux
Symposium this week - do we have any requests or gripes with 2.6 that I can
relay to the core kernel guys? Audio is a workload they don't really test.
Tim
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:03:33AM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
I haven't used kernel 2.5/2.6 for any audio stuff yet. I'm at the Linux
Symposium this week - do we have any requests or gripes with 2.6 that I can
relay to the core kernel guys? Audio is a workload they don't really test.
I'm not an
Is there SCHED_FIFO style priority available in the new kernel, with its
new threading model? Realtime audio processing doesn't share the CPU
very well. The ear can pick out even the slightest glitches or delays.
So for Linux to be usable for audio applications or embedded audio
devices it needs
On Jueves, 24 de Julio de 2003 17:46, Michael Ost wrote:
Is there SCHED_FIFO style priority available in the new kernel, with its
new threading model? Realtime audio processing doesn't share the CPU
very well. The ear can pick out even the slightest glitches or delays.
So for Linux to be
Sorry to tell you that... But try to tell us your progress only on major or semi major
updates... There is no need to tell that you have understood how to make a Makefile :
). Post Only when you got something working good and not only plaining somethin or
debugged something minor... Your
From looking at the date I'd guess it comes from up2date, which is
included in planet.
yeah, but you can't use up2date on a machine not connected to the
internet. so a machine configured without being updated (i.e. not
really 8.0 anymore) doesn't have glibc 2.3. i supposed RH are defining
Don't run up2date, just use apt. There should be a full set of updates
for redhat in the apt index on CCRMA's servers.
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
Do this in between the install apt on your RH box and install Planet
CCRMA magic kernel RPM package steps.
yes, but i'm connected
Hi!
I hate to write this in english because i dont know if i can explain what i
meant.
On Viernes, 25 de Julio de 2003 01:26, Thierry MARX wrote:
Sorry to tell you that... But try to tell us your progress only on major or
semi major updates... There is no need to tell that you have
10 matches
Mail list logo
