On Thursday 24 July 2003 13:46, Michael Ost wrote:
Is there SCHED_FIFO style priority available in the new kernel, with its
new threading model? Realtime audio processing doesn't share the CPU
very well. The ear can pick out even the slightest glitches or delays.
So for Linux to be usable for
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ingo Oeser)
For people like you gcc supports -fvolatile.
Your code will be really slow, but you save typing 'volatile' where the
C-Compiler needs it.
So, there is no do not optimize away apperent volatile variables?
Volatile variables in shmclient are easily recognized
Hello,
Version 0.0.4 of the MIDI controllable QT Mixer for ALSA is available from
http://www.suse.de/~mana/kalsatools.html
There are now GUI descriptions for SB Live, RME Digi96 and a default
description for AC97 compatible cards. The GUI has been improved and
there are new XML tags. Check the
So, there is no do not optimize away apperent volatile variables?
Volatile variables in shmclient are easily recognized -- at least
I recognized them. It is the array variable which content is only
read but never written.
No such optimization flag? Can't believe that compilers are that dump.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 04:58:35PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
So, there is no do not optimize away apperent volatile variables?
Volatile variables in shmclient are easily recognized -- at least
I recognized them. It is the array variable which content is only
read but never written.
No
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 04:58:35 +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ingo Oeser)
For people like you gcc supports -fvolatile.
Your code will be really slow, but you save typing 'volatile' where the
C-Compiler needs it.
So, there is no do not optimize away apperent
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 16:58, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
So, there is no do not optimize away apperent volatile variables?
Volatile variables in shmclient are easily recognized -- at least
I recognized them. It is the array variable which content is only
read but never written.
There is reason
fredagen den 25 juli 2003 17.32 skrev Kjetil S. Matheussen:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Thierry MARX wrote:
Sorry to tell you that... But try to tell us your progress only on
major or semi major updates... There is no need to tell that you have
understood how to make a Makefile : ). Post Only when
Hello list,
I hope there are some other users of the Terratec EWS88MT card out
there, because I seem to be in serious trouble - the card 'works'
but not in a way that makes it useful.
I've got a test program that outputs the same signal (1 kHz sine at
-6 dB below peak level) to all eight
*hum*, I'd say he's closer to 0.6 and 0.06, or even 1.6 :) in my own
^^^
than
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 12:34:18AM +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
levels, I get wildly different values. Using envy24control to set
the DAC output levels only seems to make things worse - there is
no logical relation at all between the slider position and the
actual level.
there is/was a bug
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 04:58:35PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
So, there is no do not optimize away apperent volatile variables?
Please define apperent volatile. For the shmat() path you _may_
find out, that a variable coming from that space will be
volatile. But do some casts and some
12 matches
Mail list logo
