On 20 Sep 2003 02:07:08 +0300
Jussi Laako <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 20:42, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> > PortAudio is the only cross-platform API worth considering, IMHO. Its
> > correctly designed, and works on more platforms that anything else.
>
> What drivers it uses on So
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 20:42, Paul Davis wrote:
> PortAudio is the only cross-platform API worth considering, IMHO. Its
> correctly designed, and works on more platforms that anything else.
What drivers it uses on Solaris, AIX and Tru64 platforms? If it uses OSS
I don't see much point in putting s
you might also want to check out Gray Scavone's RtAudio, which is C++
where PortAudio is C, and it provides both blocked and callback based
I/O.
"RtAudio is a C++ class which provides a common API (Application
Programming Interface) for realtime audio input/output across Linux
(native ALSA and OS
>> I'd also like to chime in that OSS is not being worked on by anybody, as
>> near as I can tell. If you want any audio hardware supported, the action
>> is in ALSA.
>
>Maybe you should take a look at http://www.4front-tech.com
they are not "working on OSS" in the sense of extending the API to
ha
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:53:39PM +0300, Jussi Laako wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 19:26, Michael Ost wrote:
>
> > I'd also like to chime in that OSS is not being worked on by anybody, as
> > near as I can tell. If you want any audio hardware supported, the action
> > is in ALSA.
>
> Maybe you
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 04:15:53 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And has anybody some interesting c-algorythm documentation on how to produce
> convolution ? I mean:
> oscilating basing wave -> mix it together with a lfo -> filter it with delay, for
> example -> ...
>
Thats not a covolution,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:48:38AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>its of less interest. perhaps zero. george anzinger's project at
>sf.net is definitely the one. read recent messages in the mailing list
>archive for an overview of what's going to be involved in using this
>stuff.
Will do !
vini
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 19:26, Michael Ost wrote:
> I'd also like to chime in that OSS is not being worked on by anybody, as
> near as I can tell. If you want any audio hardware supported, the action
> is in ALSA.
Maybe you should take a look at http://www.4front-tech.com
It's still the only cross
>Well, this sounds very interesting; but where can I find developers documentation
>about jack ? Like I said, the Homepage is not interesting for that part of
>information need... .
there is a documentation link at the top of the page. follow it. use
the example clients (there are many) as examp
>You mean: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ ?
>
>I just stumbled on this while searching for "high resolution timers" on
>google: http://www.cs.wisc.edu/paradyn/libhrtime/
>It seems old though (and probably unmaintained ?), latest patch was for
>2.4.0, so I don't know if it is of mo
directBOX Reply ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 18.09.2003 15:00:29
>It allows you to get a basic DSP algorithm producing sound without you
>worrying about how to configure the audio interface, and then later
>lets that same output be (potentially)
Lemux is a collection of (GPL) LADSPA instruments based on devices from the
openMSX emulator and other sources (e.g. sidplay2).
Changes against 0.1:
- all instruments are working, currently:
- SCCChannel (e.g. from Konami games)
(a 32 byte 8bit loope
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:23:47AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>>Open source is a bit slower to move, but at least it sticks around!
>
>So true. Anyway, at least there will be a patch; the most recent one
>for 2.4.20 just came out.
You mean: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ ?
I just
On Friday 19 September 2003 10.48, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> Hello.
> If I understood correctly, several companies are wanting patent
> royalties for streaming compressed audio from the network.
>
> Take a look at mpg321 (GPL clone of mpg123):
>
> Usage: mpg123 [options] file(s) | URL(s) | -
>
> S
>An interesting historical sidenote on this came from of our programmers,
>who was deep in the BeOS. He told me that their timeslice was 3 msecs
>once everyone had 500 MHz machines. It was down to 1 msec for the never
>released R6 version... back in, what 1999? 2000?
the sad part is that the HRT p
Hello.
If I understood correctly, several companies are wanting patent
royalties for streaming compressed audio from the network.
Take a look at mpg321 (GPL clone of mpg123):
Usage: mpg123 [options] file(s) | URL(s) | -
So, this playing from the network URLs is no no, or what?
What other softwa
16 matches
Mail list logo
