directBOX Reply ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 24.09.2003 12:07:26
Hello. Can anyone report what is going on with the EU software patents?
How they would affect immediately the audio and graphics development
we are doing? Xine?
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:59:32PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
I would like to propose the following: if EU gets the software
patents, then should non-profit open source community and non-profit
academic researchers get patents for free. Then we would be in
equally competitive situation.
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 05:59, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
They were more conserned about how companies'
money escapes from research and development to the patent lawyers
when companies *have to* start patenting. (It looks like professional
politicians do not realize that nobody forces to
Juhana, would you happen to have any pointers to the media coverage on this?
It's been a non-issue in the North American media.
http://swpat.ffii.org/
cheers
--
Tim Orford
Dear music enthousiasts,
LilyPond version 2.0 was released today. LilyPond is an automated
music notation system: it is used to make gorgeous sheet music. It is
libre software (open source), and available for most Unix flavors,
including Linux and MacOS X, and MS Windows.
Use it for your
Hallo,
Juhana Sadeharju hat gesagt: // Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
Hello. Can anyone report what is going on with the EU software patents?
How they would affect immediately the audio and graphics development
we are doing? Xine? Sodipodi? Others?
I suppose you wouldn't be allowed to control one
I'm following the LADSPA and XAP discussions from the beginning.
I've some ideas about audio plugins I've been thinking about since 2001.
What I really wanted was an audio plugin API for:
- a music composition environment
- real-time music performances
All my ideas led to a sketch of an
So, what happened to XAP?
Is this list the right place for discussion on it?
Would it be better to add my ideas to XAP spec - early scribbles
(e-mail from Tim Hockin on 4 February 2003) or to put them in an
indipendent form?
discussion about it moved to the GMPI list. GMPI is an industry-wide
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 18:20, Paul Davis wrote:
discussion about it moved to the GMPI list. GMPI is an industry-wide
attempt to define a platform+vendor neutral music plugin API.
Does this mean that the decision process is driven by commercial
interests.
If yes, is there a place for an open API
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:44:43PM +0200, Marco Ballini wrote:
So, what happened to XAP?
GMPI:
http://aulos.calarts.edu/pipermail/music-dsp/2003-February/022272.html
Is this list the right place for discussion on it?
I think XAP has been put on hold. GMPI is a much more promising project,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 05:36:59PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Juhana Sadeharju hat gesagt: // Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
Hello. Can anyone report what is going on with the EU software patents?
How they would affect immediately the audio and graphics development
we are doing? Xine?
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 18:20, Paul Davis wrote:
discussion about it moved to the GMPI list. GMPI is an industry-wide
attempt to define a platform+vendor neutral music plugin API.
Does this mean that the decision process is driven by commercial
interests.
its driven by a desire to *avoid*
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 05:21:33PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:44:43PM +0200, Marco Ballini wrote:
So, what happened to XAP?
GMPI:
http://aulos.calarts.edu/pipermail/music-dsp/2003-February/022272.html
Is this list the right place for discussion on it?
I
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:18:45PM +0200, Marco Ballini wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 18:20, Paul Davis wrote:
discussion about it moved to the GMPI list. GMPI is an industry-wide
attempt to define a platform+vendor neutral music plugin API.
Does this mean that the decision process is driven
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:18:45PM +0200, Marco Ballini wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 18:20, Paul Davis wrote:
discussion about it moved to the GMPI list. GMPI is an industry-wide
attempt to define a platform+vendor neutral music plugin API.
Does this mean that the decision process is driven
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 15:56, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
LilyPond version 2.0 was released today.
slashdot And I've only just finished compiling 1.8! /slashdot
Chris
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 12:51, Paul Winkler wrote:
Sue every radio station in the world?
Then again, Major Armstrong did give RCA a hard time back in the 50s.
Slightly different baseband frequency range, though... :)
Cheers!
Hallo,
Paul Winkler hat gesagt: // Paul Winkler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 05:36:59PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
I suppose you wouldn't be allowed to control one oscillator's
frequency with the output of another oscillator using more than about
10 Hz because that is Frequency
Hello. Can anyone report what is going on with the EU software patents?
How they would affect immediately the audio and graphics development
we are doing? Xine? Sodipodi? Others?
I suppose you wouldn't be allowed to control one oscillator's
frequency with the output of another oscillator
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 19:25, Steve Harris wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:18:45PM +0200, Marco Ballini wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 18:20, Paul Davis wrote:
discussion about it moved to the GMPI list. GMPI is an industry-wide
attempt to define a platform+vendor neutral music plugin API.
20 matches
Mail list logo
