Here is the realtime LSM version 0.0.2, for use with 2.6 kernels.
-- New features
- mlock parameter enables memory locking privileges
- allcaps parameter enables all capabilities, including CAP_SETPCAP
- restores cap-bound on exit
-- Makefile improvements
- use security/c
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 21:27, Hans Fugal wrote:
> As in, how do I share my own? What licenses or other scheme do you all
> use for music that you create and would like to be widely distributed,
> with or without any other restrictions. What considerations do you take
> into account?
http://www.crea
Every CD player I tested seem only to skips sectors when doing fast
forward.
You hear short pieces of the song at original pitch. Perhaps they do
some crossfading between
audio chunks to lower pops and clicks, I don't know.
I think the only exceptions could be DJ-style players that perhaps allow
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > thats why i dont consider it necessary. what do you need the proc entry
> > for fernando ?
>
> Just asking, I guess it is not really needed, just unloading and loading
> should be enough. It would be nice to have some sort of confirmati
> > The load time access is not so bad. You can rmmod and then reload the
> > LSM if you want to change its parameters. I've been doing that a lot
> > for testing. This has no effect on processes that are already
> > running.
>
> thats why i dont consider it necessary. what do you need the proc
Thanks!
Out of curiosity: how did you manage to keep binary compatibility?
Maarten
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 03:18 am, Maarten de Boer wrote:
> I just downloaded alsa 1.0.0rc2, and discovered that the API changed.
> For example (and this is only an example), take the function
> snd_pcm_hw_params_set_rate_near. Before, the 3th argument was the
> samplerate requested, and the return valu
Hello,
I have been unsubscribed from alsa-devel for a while, so maybe i missed
the discussion about this, but a quick look at the archives did not reveal
anything.
I just downloaded alsa 1.0.0rc2, and discovered that the API changed.
For example (and this is only an example), take the function
sn
Hello,
I already answered Uwe in his private e-mail. I copy also here my answer in
case it is of general help.
At 17.28 09/12/2003 +0100, you wrote:
But, how can I learn to use it in such a way??? I haven't found
any clue on the web page how to use a binary file as input data
for bruteFIR. Are
Hello,
thank you for your answer!
Denis Sbragion wrote:
yep, you are right. To do the convolution between the
measured sweep and the inverse filter to get the impulse
response you can use brutefir (with a little trickery). I use
it to do my own measurements with 45s log sweeps. The
inverse fi
Hello,
At 10.17 09/12/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hello,
Apostolos Dimitromanolakis wrote:
I would be interested in this project too. What I'm looking
for is actuallay an anti-reverb that will be able to cancel
reverbs in a listening room, well always in conjunction with
the listener position.
Then I
does anyone know what a h/w CD player actually does when in fast
forward mode? does it skip sectors? how many? etc. thanks.
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:38:59PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> Not right now. I haven't discovered a way to add an entry to /proc
> without patching the kernel, and I don't want to do that. There is a
> new `sysfs' in 2.6 that seems to allow similar kinds of dynamic
> control. I haven't figured
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:12:50PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > hmm... perhaps we trick the binary by setting the gid back
> > to the e_gid after enabling capabilities :)
>
> Clever idea, but contrary to the POSIX standard for exec()...
>
> [explanation why not so cle
tisdagen den 09 december 2003 13.35 skrev Steve Harris:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:57:16 +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote:
> > I googled a little last night, some people we all know popped up here and
> > there (Hi Steve, Mark and Bob).
> > There was a LAD message from 2001, someone who had been in co
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:57:16 +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote:
> I googled a little last night, some people we all know popped up here and
> there (Hi Steve, Mark and Bob).
> There was a LAD message from 2001, someone who had been in contact with Yamaha
> and it seemed they(Yamaha) where working t
Hi,
tisdagen den 09 december 2003 12.22 skrev Steve Harris:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:25:42AM +0100, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > > > I seem to recall that it does, but that the packet size is smaller,
> > > > making the latency problem easier to deal with.
> > >
> > > Isoch - 1394 has a timer op
On Martes, 09 de Diciembre de 2003 10:57, Gerrit Niestijl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When i use timidity in alsa seq mode with a sequencer like muse or
> seq24, the timing is not very good. If i use fluidsynth the
> timing is much better. I would like to use timidity though, because
> of its support for the
Hello,
Apostolos Dimitromanolakis wrote:
I would be interested in this project too. What I'm looking
for is actuallay an anti-reverb that will be able to cancel
reverbs in a listening room, well always in conjunction with
the listener position.
Then I think DRC (digital room correction) is for you
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:38:55AM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> Have we tried? It seems like a deeply paramoid check, to disallow sgid
> programs. Is that REALLY the business of the toolkit? I think they're
> overstepping their bounds, and they need to be reminded that some OTHER
> people need st
Jesper Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:13:48PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > Do they have a valid reason? Or are they just imposing their paranoia on us
> > for fun?
>
> Their explanation is here:
>
> http://www.gtk.org/setuid.html
Good reasons, IMHO.
And I see no reason why drawing
21 matches
Mail list logo
