[linux-audio-dev] java-vst

2004-02-10 Thread RTaylor
Just ran across this at http://www.kvr-vst.com/index.php http://sourceforge.net/projects/jvstwrapper/ I was thinking it might be useful to some{every}one.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Benjamin Flaming
On Monday 09 February 2004 09:57 pm, Jens M Andreasen wrote: > On tis, 2004-02-10 at 03:45, Benjamin Flaming wrote: > > On Monday 09 February 2004 05:58 pm, Dave Robillard wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 18:50, Dave Griffiths wrote: > > > > jack works with intel830 DRI > > > > > > Hmm.. I only h

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Jack O'Quin
Vincent Touquet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would you consider implementing a work around (aka non portable kludgery) > a waste of time ? In the 2.4 kernel this test in mm/mlock.c limits page locking to half of physical memory... /* we may lock at most half of physical memory... */

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Dave Robillard
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 16:51, Chris Pickett wrote: > Paul Davis wrote: > >>On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:32:35PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > >> > >>>its a basic problem with real time software, the POSIX API etc. > >>>JACK tries to lock *all* the process memory. > >> > >>This is to ensure that nothing

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:57:17PM -0500, Jesse Chappell wrote: >BTW, i just ran JACK realtime on a T41p with the firegl T2 128MB, >using the ati 3.7.0 drivers on a 2.4.22 PE/LL kernel with no problems. >Alsa 0.9.8 using the builtin audio (snd-intel8x0). the machine >itself has 512MB of RAM. Grea

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Jesse Chappell
Vincent Touquet wrote on Tue, 10-Feb-2004: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:57:17PM -0500, Jesse Chappell wrote: > >BTW, i just ran JACK realtime on a T41p with the firegl T2 128MB, > >using the ati 3.7.0 drivers on a 2.4.22 PE/LL kernel with no problems. > >Alsa 0.9.8 using the builtin audio (snd

[linux-audio-dev] libsndfile-python version 87.11.5252

2004-02-10 Thread rm
That's right kids, the most mediocre sndfile binding for python just got more mediocrer! libsndfile-python now has numarray support! and that's not all, this version has been tested even less extensively than any version previous! To get libsndfile-python (with numarray support) goto: http://arc

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Chris Pickett
Paul Davis wrote: On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:32:35PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: its a basic problem with real time software, the POSIX API etc. JACK tries to lock *all* the process memory. This is to ensure that nothing gets swapped out, right ? Else it is very hard to ensure real time performance

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Dave Phillips
Hi Chris: Well, the soundcard is an SBLive Value that I've used for quite a while without problems. Yes, I'll try removing things and seeing what happens next. The nVidia driver is the first to go... Best, dp Chris Pickett wrote: Dave Phillips wrote: So I'm wondering how I can best tr

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Jesse Chappell
Vincent Touquet wrote on Tue, 10-Feb-2004: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:45:49PM +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote: > >I'm running quite happily with DRI enabled on my ATI card now, the problem was > >definitely that it was trying to lock too much memory. > > Ok. I assume that you have a Firegl T

Re: fluxus (was: Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?)

2004-02-10 Thread Dave Griffiths
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:45:30 +0100 (CET), CK wrote > hi dave, > > I read: > > I've had problems getting v19 to work, so I don't think the released fluxus > > version supports the new api yet - it's only a few small changes though. > > I think I sent you patches to make fluxus work with the new AP

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Dave Robillard
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 08:31, Dave Phillips wrote: > Greetings: > > Recently I've been having a lot of trouble with extraneous noise from > my system. Some apps are worse than others, but it does seem that > JACK-enabled apps fare the worst. - Take that binary driver out of your kernel (I know

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Chris Pickett
Dave Phillips wrote: So I'm wondering how I can best troubleshoot my system. The problem appears to be either JACK, the video driver, or maybe something to do with disk I/O (? it's an ext3 system). If anyone else out there is using a similar setup please let me know if you've done anything sp

[linux-audio-dev] Vstserver v0.3.1

2004-02-10 Thread Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen
Vstserver is a program that must be running when using programs using vstlib. Vstlib is a library that can be used by programs to run windows vst audio plugins under i386linux/i386freebsd/i386solaris/i386etc. (May require som modifications for other os-es than i386linux). A tutorial for vst pl

fluxus (was: Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?)

2004-02-10 Thread CK
hi dave, I read: > I've had problems getting v19 to work, so I don't think the released fluxus > version supports the new api yet - it's only a few small changes though. I think I sent you patches to make fluxus work with the new API (didn't I?) but AFAIK portaudio's jack implementation is curren

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 08:31:10AM -0500, Dave Phillips wrote: > Machine is an 800 MHz AMD w. 512 MB RAM, system is Planet CCRMA RH 9. >Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated. I haven't had this >kind of noise problem before now, I'd certainly like to get rid of it, >and I'm willin

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 14.07, Vincent Touquet wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:45:49PM +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote: > >I'm running quite happily with DRI enabled on my ATI card now, the problem > > was definitely that it was trying to lock too much memory. > > Ok. I assume that you have a F

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Paul Davis
>On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:32:35PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: >>its a basic problem with real time software, the POSIX API etc. >>JACK tries to lock *all* the process memory. > >This is to ensure that nothing gets swapped out, right ? >Else it is very hard to ensure real time performance ? >(sorry

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:45:49PM +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote: >I'm running quite happily with DRI enabled on my ATI card now, the problem was >definitely that it was trying to lock too much memory. Ok. I assume that you have a Firegl T2 with 128Mb Ram (using the ATI 3.7.0 drivers) ? >Since sh

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Dave Phillips
Greetings: Recently I've been having a lot of trouble with extraneous noise from my system. Some apps are worse than others, but it does seem that JACK-enabled apps fare the worst. Following this thread it occurred to me that perhaps my video driver is at fault. I have a gForce2 and am using

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 13.32, Vincent Touquet wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:32:35PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > >its a basic problem with real time software, the POSIX API etc. > >JACK tries to lock *all* the process memory. > > This is to ensure that nothing gets swapped out, right ? > E

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Dave Griffiths
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:21:08 +0100, Vincent Touquet wrote > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:58:49PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > >I remember seeing that page a little while back, I'll definately look > >into it.. looks pretty crazy! > > It definitely looks great. > I want to test it too. > > >(If it

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:32:35PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: >its a basic problem with real time software, the POSIX API etc. >JACK tries to lock *all* the process memory. This is to ensure that nothing gets swapped out, right ? Else it is very hard to ensure real time performance ? (sorry for bei

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:58:49PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: >I remember seeing that page a little while back, I'll definately look >into it.. looks pretty crazy! It definitely looks great. I want to test it too. >(If it's based on portaudio can I still connect it to my jack graph >somehow? N

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:32:35PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: >the implementation of DRI by certain video interface drivers means >that we end up trying to lock the video memory as well, and this tends >to fail for various reasons. Hm, that sounds bad. Does this problem also happen with the open sou

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:19:55PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: >Now that ATI has gone the way of Nvidia I don't know who to pledge >allegiance to. :) >Is Matrox still friendly? I would say that there is still hope as far as ATI is concerned. They are delivering specs to the Linuxbios people, so t

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Vincent Touquet
Do you use the Radeon binary driver ? v On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:26:20PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: >Through a painful process I'd rather not go into, I discovered that Jack >will not run in realtime mode with my Radeon's 3d drivers loaded.. I get >the error "cannot lock down memory for RT th

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Joern Nettingsmeier
Paul Davis wrote: I guess I'll have to wait for the day when I can afford two multi-channel audio interfaces, two multi-channel MIDI interfaces, and a dedicated machine to handle the visualisation aspect of things. or ... you could just get a Matrox video interface, since they seem to be just abo

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Joern Nettingsmeier
Dave Robillard wrote: On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 18:50, Dave Griffiths wrote: jack works with intel830 DRI Hmm.. I only have Radeon's, so I'm a bit out of luck as far as testing other cards I guess. Anyone else have a positive/negative experience? i'm using dri with an ancient 3dfx voodoo3 3000 agp

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 02.11, Paul Davis wrote: > >I guess I'll have to wait for the day when I can afford two > >multi-channel audio interfaces, two multi-channel MIDI interfaces, and a > >dedicated machine to handle the visualisation aspect of things. > > or ... you could just get a Matrox v

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 01.32, Paul Davis wrote: > >On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 18:50, Dave Griffiths wrote: > >> jack works with intel830 DRI > > > >Hmm.. I only have Radeon's, so I'm a bit out of luck as far as testing > >other cards I guess. > > > >Anyone else have a positive/negative experience?