[linux-audio-dev] Evolutionary Development, was: [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, > I looked into hydrogen code. To learn. I looked into lot of little projects > code. Dead projects. To learn. And IMHO they're not useless. Maybe my > project will be dead at the end of the year. But then i made my experience > and still can join hydrogen or other projects. > I agree with yo

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Building qarecord and alsamodularsynth

2004-03-01 Thread Dave Robillard
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 23:53, Mark Johnathan Greenaway wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:36:42PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > > > I'm quite a fan of alsamodularsynth and have been recommending it to > > > friends. The only problem I have with it is that rather than use > > > automake/autoconf fo

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Building qarecord and alsamodularsynth

2004-03-01 Thread Mark Johnathan Greenaway
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:36:42PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > > I'm quite a fan of alsamodularsynth and have been recommending it to > > friends. The only problem I have with it is that rather than use > > automake/autoconf for building it has Makefiles that only work without > > editing under

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Building qarecord and alsamodularsynth

2004-03-01 Thread Dave Robillard
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 22:41, Mark Johnathan Greenaway wrote: > I'm quite a fan of alsamodularsynth and have been recommending it to > friends. The only problem I have with it is that rather than use > automake/autoconf for building it has Makefiles that only work without > editing under SuSE. Of co

[linux-audio-dev] Building qarecord and alsamodularsynth

2004-03-01 Thread Mark Johnathan Greenaway
I'm quite a fan of alsamodularsynth and have been recommending it to friends. The only problem I have with it is that rather than use automake/autoconf for building it has Makefiles that only work without editing under SuSE. Of course, editing the Makefiles to get it to build on other distributions

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Cross platform mixer API?

2004-03-01 Thread Conrad Parker
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:04:40PM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:09:34 +1300 > Eliot Blennerhassett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > I am aware of PortMixer, which is a simple API that abstracts volume controls. > > > > Is anyone aware of any other

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Pete Bessman
At Tue, 2 Mar 2004 01:19:00 +0100, Peter Eschler wrote: > And yes: I looked into hydrogen code. To learn. I looked into lot of > little projects code. Dead projects. To learn. And IMHO they're not > useless. Maybe my project will be dead at the end of the year. But > then i made my experience and s

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Peter Eschler
On Monday 01 March 2004 19:53, Dave Griffiths wrote: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:24:26 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote > > Also large teams are not really the answer - often one or two people work > much more effeciently due to communication overhead. I can't remember the > stats, but you have to get to quite

[linux-audio-dev] [request] Info on the Awe32 schematics

2004-03-01 Thread Juan Linietsky
Does any of you know how to get PROPER docummentation on the Sound Blaster AWE32? and If possible, official datasheets or something.. I think creative's official devkit is gone from the internet... And all I get is incomplete unofficial specs. here and there.. Do you guys also know if people fr

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Tim Hockin
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 03:20:46PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > Speaking of GMPI, what's the status there anyway? Coincidentally, my > dream modular synth (and effects bay) could use a more advanced plugin > format than LADSPA... > > Is there a GMPI progress page or something like that? http:

Re: [linux-audio-dev] liblo first release (0.2)

2004-03-01 Thread Steve Harris
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 06:43:45 +0100, martin rumori wrote: > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:22:21PM +, Steve Harris wrote: > > http://plugin.org.uk/liblo/ > > > > liblo is a simple to use, lightweight OSC C library implementation > > looks great. sorry, don't have the time yet to test/use it.

OSS Audio development (was Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1)

2004-03-01 Thread J_Zar
Alle 19:24, lunedì 1 marzo 2004, Tim Hockin ha scritto: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 07:07, guenter geiger wrote: > > > Lack of collaboration is one of the weaknesses of the free software > > > development (peculiarly enough it is consi

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Dave Robillard
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 14:37, Tim Hockin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:53:26PM +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote: > > > (*) Assuming smart people who could find a common vision. ;) > > > The answer is to have common stuff like JACK and LADSPA - this seems to work > > really well, and share out the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Tim Hockin
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:53:26PM +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote: > > (*) Assuming smart people who could find a common vision. ;) > The answer is to have common stuff like JACK and LADSPA - this seems to work > really well, and share out the bits that appeal to different developers. I've been put

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Dave Robillard
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 13:24, Tim Hockin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 07:07, guenter geiger wrote: > > > Lack of collaboration is one of the weaknesses of the free software > > > development (peculiarly enough it is considered one

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Paul Davis
>The difference is, they have armys of programmers whereas the open source >apps only have a few at most with the skill to work on apps as elaborate as >say Cubase or similar. I think it would be far better to collaborate on what evidence do you have of the "armys of programmers"? my impression i

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Ken
The difference is, they have armys of programmers whereas the open source apps only have a few at most with the skill to work on apps as elaborate as say Cubase or similar. I think it would be far better to collaborate on Linux Audios' weak areas and go after equivalants in the Win world. Its goi

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Dave Griffiths
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:24:26 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 07:07, guenter geiger wrote: > > > Lack of collaboration is one of the weaknesses of the free software > > > development (peculiarly enough it is considere

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Tim Hockin
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 07:07, guenter geiger wrote: > > Lack of collaboration is one of the weaknesses of the free software > > development (peculiarly enough it is considered one of its strenghts), > > especially with audio software.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio Experiences

2004-03-01 Thread Dave Robillard
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 11:30, Tim Goetze wrote: > [Dave Robillard] > > >> Overall, I should mention that the majority of my time was spent > >> wrestling with LADSPA plugins. Some cased reliability issues in Ardour > >> (see above, more info to come). Some gave me some OK sounds, but I have > >>

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Dave Robillard
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 07:07, guenter geiger wrote: > Lack of collaboration is one of the weaknesses of the free software > development (peculiarly enough it is considered one of its strenghts), > especially with audio software. A weakness compared to what? Proprietary software is /definitely/ not

Re: [linux-audio-dev] liblo first release (0.2)

2004-03-01 Thread martin rumori
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:22:21PM +, Steve Harris wrote: > http://plugin.org.uk/liblo/ > > liblo is a simple to use, lightweight OSC C library implementation looks great. sorry, don't have the time yet to test/use it. but i will in the future. c interfaces look really charming when define

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio Experiences

2004-03-01 Thread Tim Goetze
[Dave Robillard] >> Overall, I should mention that the majority of my time was spent >> wrestling with LADSPA plugins. Some cased reliability issues in Ardour >> (see above, more info to come). Some gave me some OK sounds, but I have >> noticed in the mixdown that the guitar orverdrive doesn't h

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hi, Zitat von guenter geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > Still I probably won't test Lindrum :( > > as I didn't test Hydrogen, > > I don't quite understand this attitude. Testing hydrogen would involve > apt-get install hydrogen, start it and listen to the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread guenter geiger
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Still I probably won't test Lindrum :( > as I didn't test Hydrogen, I don't quite understand this attitude. Testing hydrogen would involve apt-get install hydrogen, start it and listen to the demo song. Probably soon the same will be true for lindrum.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Peter Eschler hat gesagt: // Peter Eschler wrote: > Yeah, a screenie means at least it did compile ;) I know it look's ugly with > another theme. That's pointed out the webpage. Give me some time to breath, i > will work on this.. I think that with your theme the GUI actually looks real

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Steve Harris
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 08:18:10 +0100, Peter Eschler wrote: > Hi LADs, > > Lindrum is an open-source drummachine that offers ten channels, realtime > control, a simple pattern sequencer and a graphical user-interface. It > currently runs under Linux only, it is developed in C++ and uses JACK, A

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Comix
Dave Robillard wrote: On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 14:18, Peter Eschler wrote: Hi LADs, Lindrum is an open-source drummachine that offers ten channels, realtime control, a simple pattern sequencer and a graphical user-interface. It currently runs under Linux only, it is developed in C++ and uses JACK,

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Jens M Andreasen
Hi Peter! I suppose you have never heard of this baby: http://www.vintagesynth.org/linn/linn2.shtml /jens On sön, 2004-02-29 at 20:18, Peter Eschler wrote: > Hi LADs, > > Lindrum is an open-source drummachine that offers ten channels, realtime > control, a simple pattern sequencer and a grap

[linux-audio-dev] ICMC 2004: Grace Period for Deadline of Submissions

2004-03-01 Thread tae hong park
Please pardon cross postings. The ICMC 2004 submission deadline for music, video art, and installations which was originally February 27, 2004 has been changed to reflect an additional grace period of two business days. The updated submissions deadline for music, video art, and installations is

[linux-audio-dev] ICMC 2004 submission deadline nearing soon

2004-03-01 Thread tae hong park
Please pardon cross-postings First Deadline for Submissions Nearing Soon: ICMC 2004 The University of Miami is pleased to announce the general call for submissions to ICMC 2004, to be held 1-6 November in Miami, Florida USA. The submission deadline for music, video art, and installations is Feb