Re: [Agnula-Developers] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Request to audio related LiveCD packagers

2004-05-09 Thread Jack O'Quin
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I tend to look at it (very conveniently, of course) as neither. I view > it as part of the hardware device we're dealing with. Without it the > device does not work. It is distributed as a separate file (inside the > driver disk that actua

Re: [Agnula-Developers] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Request to audio related LiveCD packagers

2004-05-09 Thread Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
> let me clarify the situation. there are a couple of different > questions regarding this: > > 1. is the firmware binary is a program or a data? > 2. can we force the h/w vendor to show the source code under GPL (if >exists) in practice? > 3. if not, shouldn't we change the license to the no

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ot] Some pictures from LAConf2

2004-05-09 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Frank van de Pol hat gesagt: // Frank van de Pol wrote: > In reply to Frank's first ZKM pictures I just put a real quick & dirty page > online which shows some more pictures of the great LAC2004. > > http://www.fpaudio.com/lac2004/ Hey Frank, thanks a lot. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht

[linux-audio-dev] lash subversion repository

2004-05-09 Thread Bob Ham
Hi all, Just a note to say that a lash subversion[0] repository is up at svn://svn.lash-audio-session-handler.org/lash/lash/trunk It's currently uncompilable, but that'll change :) Bob [0] http://subversion.tigris.org/ -- Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>