On Sun, 2004-05-16 at 06:53, martin rumori wrote:
> o.k. let's complete it step by step...
> On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 02:32:35AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> > >On Saturday 15 May 2004 16:53, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> > >
> > >> Can you (or anyone) name all the people in this group picture?
> > >>
> > >> h
On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 03:23, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
> sure, libxml2 is huge, but almost everybody will have it in memory
> anyway, since it's used by other programs.
>
> imho, xml *is* very human-readable if the DTD is sane and the output
> is pretty-printed. and it's already defined, all th
Jack O'Quin wrote:
Fons Adriaensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:31:01AM -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote:
>>
LISP is quite nice actually, but you'd need a complete LISP engine to
read it...
That wasn't really a serious suggestion. The libguile.so.12.3.0 file
on my system is ov
o.k. let's complete it step by step...
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 02:32:35AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >On Saturday 15 May 2004 16:53, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> >
> >> Can you (or anyone) name all the people in this group picture?
> >>
> >> http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/contrib/zkm_meeting_2004/photo
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 09:14:46AM +0200, Marcus Andersson wrote:
> > >This also means that it is illegal to include 0 in the parameter range.
> >
> >In that case you can use f(x) = x*a^x, with a = f(1).
> >
>
> How do I invert this function? I am stuck.
You need the inverse only to set the slid
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 02:15:11AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 02:43:17 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > Just use a command that will add the necessary information to a database
> > maintained by the host. Searching for a plugin and actually hosting it
> > are two separat
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 07:10:30AM +0200, Marcus Andersson wrote:
Interesting interpretation. This means that the mapping between the
slider and the parameter will be
f(x) = k*a^x
with k=f(0) and a = f(1) if the slider goes form 0 to 1.
You probably meant a = f(1)/f
