Re: [linux-audio-dev] LSM 2004 music theme: July 8th/9th

2004-07-05 Thread Frank NEUMANN
Hi all, Francois wrote: The complete program is there: http://prog.lsm2004.abul.org/program/view_topic.php?topic_id=4langnew=en To ask the obvious question here :-) - will there be live audio broadcasts from this event? Would be cool to attend such a meeting virtually myself for the first

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LSM 2004 music theme: July 8th/9th

2004-07-05 Thread Francois Dechelle
Le lun 05/07/2004 à 15:59, Frank NEUMANN a écrit : Hi all, Francois wrote: The complete program is there: http://prog.lsm2004.abul.org/program/view_topic.php?topic_id=4langnew=en To ask the obvious question here :-) - will there be live audio broadcasts from this event? Would be cool

Re: [linux-audio-dev] NPTL/2.6 (was snd-hdsp oddities)

2004-07-05 Thread Michael Ost
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 19:16, Paul Davis wrote: When the dust settles from the kernel and NPTL, 2.6 will be more viable. Right now, even though it works for some people, its not a generally viable platform for realtime audio. What sort of issues are you seeing with NPTL and the 2.6 kernel? Are

Re: [linux-audio-dev] NPTL/2.6 (was snd-hdsp oddities)

2004-07-05 Thread Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 09:24, Michael Ost wrote: On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 19:16, Paul Davis wrote: When the dust settles from the kernel and NPTL, 2.6 will be more viable. Right now, even though it works for some people, its not a generally viable platform for realtime audio. What sort of

Re: [linux-audio-dev] NPTL/2.6 (was snd-hdsp oddities)

2004-07-05 Thread Charles de Martigny
--- Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 09:24, Michael Ost wrote: On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 19:16, Paul Davis wrote: When the dust settles from the kernel and NPTL, 2.6 will be more viable. Right now, even though it works for some people, its not a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-05 Thread Albert Graef
Niklas Werner wrote: You can play around with comparing LPC and FFT results at different settings by using my software :-) http://sonasound.sf.net/ Thanks, I'll try that, too. -- Dr. Albert Graf Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-05 Thread Albert Graef
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: This floated by a month or so back: http://ab-initio.mit.edu/harminv/ Thanks, that looks like a viable alternative, I'll have a look at that. I have messed with wavelets (dyadic and the discrete approximation of continuous wavelets) and I always found that they never

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-05 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:01:29 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Albert Graef) wrote: What where the specific problems you encountered? I've never tried wavelets for the purpose of spectrum estimation, so it would be very kind if you could share your experiences. The results I obtained with wavelets