mån 2004-10-25 klockan 20.47 skrev Dave Phillips:
> Hi Mathias:
>
> Alas, I'm still on MusE 0.6.3, the feature isn't implemented in the
> piano roll editor. Part selection by arrow key is there and very nice to
> use.
>
> Time to upgrade...
>
The inevitable swamp of upgrades and their dep
Hi Mathias:
Alas, I'm still on MusE 0.6.3, the feature isn't implemented in the
piano roll editor. Part selection by arrow key is there and very nice to
use.
Time to upgrade...
Best,
dp
Mathias Lundgren wrote:
mån 2004-10-25 klockan 17.54 skrev Dave Phillips:
Hi Chris:
I must emphasize tha
mån 2004-10-25 klockan 17.54 skrev Dave Phillips:
> Hi Chris:
>
> I must emphasize that my working methods are likely to be far less
> common that the use of mouse + MIDI keyboard. MusE and RG are excellent
> applications, and I'm just an old dog who is recalcitrant about learning
> new trick
Hi Chris:
I must emphasize that my working methods are likely to be far less
common that the use of mouse + MIDI keyboard. MusE and RG are excellent
applications, and I'm just an old dog who is recalcitrant about learning
new tricks (at least re: MIDI sequencing). Ten years of using one
sequ
On Monday 25 Oct 2004 16:26, Dave Phillips wrote:
> The use of the computer keyboard in Sequencer Plus is the main
> reason I keep using it. MusE, RG, and the crop of Windoze MIDI
> sequencers are all very nice, but they all presume that my working
> method will be mouse & MIDI-keyboard centric.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 11:26:01AM -0400, Dave Phillips wrote:
> It
> looks as though your project attempts to revive the more extensive use
> of the keyboard in a GUI sequencer, is that correct ?
Project is a bit of a big word, it's just this concept now.
And yes. Keyboard control can be so muc
Greetings:
The use of the computer keyboard in Sequencer Plus is the main reason
I keep using it. MusE, RG, and the crop of Windoze MIDI sequencers are
all very nice, but they all presume that my working method will be mouse
& MIDI-keyboard centric. I don't play keyboard worth a damn, and I fin
Hi!
I have been thinking about transfering the concept of a
cursor from text editing to MIDI editing.
Since this not specific to any existing sequencer I like
to present my concept here, in hope of feedback and
maybe some project picking it up.
http://wrstud.urz.uni-wuppertal.de/~ka0394/forum
http://www.notam02.no/arkiv/src/
Snd-ls 0.9.1.1 changes:
0.9.1 -> 0.9.1.1:
-Fixed Append File edit-menu option.
-Workaround for trouble with ladspa default settings.
Sono 0.2 changes:
Some very few small changes to make it compile with linux again. Used some
code from the port fo
I read:
> I'm actually looking for an alternative edit environment for SC, so I
> can bypass Emacs.
you could try august's scfront: http://aug.ment.org/scfront/
it's hardly as full featured but it can do the trick. As others
previously mentioned you can pipe code to sclang via stdin or
via sclang
Hallo,
Mario Lang hat gesagt: // Mario Lang wrote:
> No, its actually the job of your distributor to configure programs
> such that they work together nicely. On Debian, I've never had
> any backspace issues with Emacs.
This actually is on Debian. After a fresh install or all emacs
related, empt
11 matches
Mail list logo
