CK wrote:
I read:
for the record, i sent a mail to rme as well and got exactly the same
answer (in german) which i saw before here on this list.
I still don't see the point, the GPL _protects_ their IP rights, if I
was the evil corporation trying to rip off rme I could aswell rip the
thing apart
I read:
Is this true, that a firewire driver for one card can be used with
equal power for another card?
what I was referring to is rather the idea to sell the same hardware with
minor modification at very different prices and putting the limitations in
the binary only driver (miro dc10 and
Hi Steve, thanks for the reply.
I will definitely look into using DSSI, looks like it
could be good once as supported as LADSPA is (I'd
never even heard of it before your post, although
that's probably just me). Is it intended as an
eventual LADSPA replacement? I never really saw the
need to
139Uwe Koloska wrote:
CK wrote:
I read:
for the record, i sent a mail to rme as well and got exactly the same
answer (in german) which i saw before here on this list.
I still don't see the point, the GPL _protects_ their IP rights, if I
was the evil corporation trying to rip off rme I could
Stefan Turner wrote:
I will definitely look into using DSSI, looks like it
could be good once as supported as LADSPA is (I'd
never even heard of it before your post, although
that's probably just me). Is it intended as an
eventual LADSPA replacement? I never really saw the
need to divide plugins
somehow a nice idea, i only see one problem:
firewire and usb audio devices are mainly used with laptops, whih
normaly have only one ethernet port. if you have a desktop, you could
also use a pci audio card.
what about usb 2.0 audio cards? has firewire any advantage? big
disadvantage with
smoerk wrote:
somehow a nice idea, i only see one problem:
firewire and usb audio devices are mainly used with laptops, whih
normaly have only one ethernet port. if you have a desktop, you could
also use a pci audio card.
A multi port wire speed switch would probably set you back about $20.
In a
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 09:03 -0500, Dave Phillips wrote:
If I may chime in here... I urge all Linux audio developers to read the
DSSI spec, it's well-written and directly addresses some of LADSPA's
shortcomings. After working with VSTi plugins for a while I've begun to
see the need for
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 01:20 +0100, CK wrote:
I still don't see the point, the GPL _protects_ their IP rights
It only protects the source of the driver.
if I
was the evil corporation trying to rip off rme I could aswell rip the
thing apart and reverse engineer the code and the protocol,
Bob Knight wrote:
smoerk wrote:
somehow a nice idea, i only see one problem:
firewire and usb audio devices are mainly used with laptops, whih
normaly have only one ethernet port. if you have a desktop, you could
also use a pci audio card.
A multi port wire speed switch would probably set you
btw, is there anyone working on an implementation of gibson's magic for
linux? is it even possible?
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 19:36, Georg Rudolph wrote:
Please, let's not be too harsh. I recently bought the pcmcia based
multiface from RME, only because it has linux support, and it works
great, on both kernels. Of course, firewire is cooler, but there is this
way out.
Not for me. :)
anyway
I assume that RME has developped their own protocols, which they don't
want to share. And frankly I can understand their point of view, because
I think an awfull lot of time (=money) must have been spent to develop
an efficient protocol.
1. So they haven't invested the a comparable
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 12:34:17AM +0100, Marek Peteraj wrote:
Which seems like it's the beginning of end for linux pro-audio hw
support if we don't fight for it. Right now it concerns just me, but it
might concern everyone in the near future.
How can we fight it? I've been holding off on a
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 23:17, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 00:34:17 +0100, Marek Peteraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
2. I can only understand the point of view of open source developers
here, since they also invested an awfull lot of time (and money that
they didn't get back!)
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 22:48, Tim Hockin wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 12:34:17AM +0100, Marek Peteraj wrote:
Which seems like it's the beginning of end for linux pro-audio hw
support if we don't fight for it. Right now it concerns just me, but it
might concern everyone in the near future.
Bob Knight wrote:
I want an open ethernet audio device.
I do not want or need to deal with pci, firewire, usb.
Fair enough, and an interesting project, though personally I'm
more interested in doing a firewire device.
Use one of many controllers out there with a good embedded
linux port and build
sorry I'll do this at once:
I read:
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 23:17, Mark Knecht wrote:
This I agree with, but the best way to fight for it (speaking as a
business man) is to develop a real market for it. We need thousands of
buyers. Develop the market and hardware manufacturers will come.
18 matches
Mail list logo
