Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>They think that if there is no "producer" backing the product then they can
>>attack the user as the guilty of the patent infraction, and I think that we
>>will see more threats and trials because of that. This is something that is
>>happening, not only
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:47:25 +0100
"Pedro Lozano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then I dont understand why there are companies pushing for the aproval of
> software patents in europe and worldwide. To patent stupid things and not
> using these patents for anything?
Look, the patenting of stupid t
On Wed, 2004-08-12 at 12:18 +, Steve Harris wrote:
> I'm pretty sure someone else is working on something like this, OSC driven
> UI, modules as LADSPA plugins, cant remeber the name though.
>
> DSSI might be better for some SSM modules, it allows bulk data transfer
> from UI->plugin and a cou
On Wed, 2004-08-12 at 16:43 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:41:24 +0100, Mario Lang wrote
> > Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I'm pretty sure someone else is working on something like this, OSC driven
> > > UI, modules as LADSPA plugins, cant remeber the na
>Then I dont understand why there are companies pushing for the aproval of
>software patents in europe and worldwide. To patent stupid things and not
>using these patents for anything?
fear, and copycat behaviour. there is this idea (inspired by IBM and
others) of building a "patent portfolio" t
Then I dont understand why there are companies pushing for the aproval of
software patents in europe and worldwide. To patent stupid things and not
using these patents for anything?
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List
Hi,
just wanted to say that there are 10 posts already, none of those guys
were actively participating in recent threads except Martin IIRC. I
counted at least another 10-15 people who mentioned that they're using
RME on LAD/LAU. For those who don't feel like expressing their opinion
at all, i'd l
Hi,
> Or has some or all this stuff already been done? Most of the work will be in
> converting ssm's 50+ existing plugins to ladspa - and writing a gui that sends
> osc messages.
I think this is a great idea, since it allows everyone else to share the
DSP.
Marek
>They think that if there is no "producer" backing the product then they can
>attack the user as the guilty of the patent infraction, and I think that we
>will see more threats and trials because of that. This is something that is
>happening, not only my thoughs.
it is *not* happening. its as s
I didnt say they were right, I said that they think they are right.
They think that if there is no "producer" backing the product then they can
attack the user as the guilty of the patent infraction, and I think that we
will see more threats and trials because of that. This is something that is
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:01 , 'Pedro Lozano' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>
> >> 2) If such an issue should be discovered, Novell will back up the
> >>Linux side with their patent-portfolio, which (cough) *could*
> >>(cough) be an expensive experience for the attacker.
>
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:01 , 'Pedro Lozano' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>> 2) If such an issue should be discovered, Novell will back up the Linux
>> side with their patent-portfolio, which (cough) *could* (cough) be an
>> expensive experience for the attacker.
>
>Novell would back linux if they can
>> 4) The end user is not responsible for what patent issues the producer
>> might get involved with.
>
>Many companies thinks that it is, the SCO vs DaimlerCrysler case (because of
>they use Linux) is an example, that case is because of copyright but surely
>will be many like that because of pat
Actually, if I recall correctly, SCO vs Daimler is a breach of contract
case. They're suing Daimler Chrysler because they failed to send info on
their use of Unix as per the contract at the time, however DC hasn't
used the system for several years.
Pedro Lozano wrote:
I think all your points ar
I think all your points are wrong:
1) There is currently no valid patent issues with Linux. So there is no
issues to be resolved either.
If MS has patented things so stupid like the double click
(http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/06/02/258.shtml?tid=109&tid=155&tid=187&tid=99)
I bet there are ma
On Wed, 08 Dec, 2004 at 05:17PM +0100, Jens M Andreasen spake thus:
> The keyword here is *could*. It is an empty threat.
>
> 1) There is currently no valid patent issues with Linux. So there is no
> issues to be resolved either.
>
> 2) If such an issue should be discovered, Novell will back up t
The keyword here is *could*. It is an empty threat.
1) There is currently no valid patent issues with Linux. So there is no
issues to be resolved either.
2) If such an issue should be discovered, Novell will back up the Linux
side with their patent-portfolio, which (cough) *could* (cough) be an
e
Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 20:34 +0100, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
> > Jack has been distributed with Mandrake 10.1 without the realtime
> > module. So it only runs as root by default here, and then still being
> > severely disturbed by the underlying journaling fi
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 08:28 -0600, Cornell III, Howard M wrote:
> The 11/22 issue of Computerworld has a blurb about Microsoft CEO Steve
> Ballmer warning government leaders in Singapore that switching their
> 20,000 PCs from Windows to Linux could subject them to patent lawsuits.
> I have heard so
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:41:24 +0100, Mario Lang wrote
> Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm pretty sure someone else is working on something like this, OSC driven
> > UI, modules as LADSPA plugins, cant remeber the name though.
>
> Its called Om, and AFAIK maintained by drobilla on
Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm pretty sure someone else is working on something like this, OSC driven
> UI, modules as LADSPA plugins, cant remeber the name though.
Its called Om, and AFAIK maintained by drobilla on #lad.
It has a very cool design, UI agnostic and all. Go Om, go
All,
The 11/22 issue of Computerworld has a blurb about Microsoft CEO Steve
Ballmer warning government leaders in Singapore that switching their
20,000 PCs from Windows to Linux could subject them to patent lawsuits.
I have heard some tales about commercial versions of Linux including
indemnifi
[Jens M Andreasen]
>P: That thunder rumble turned into a tin-can when I watched the show
> at my mother-in-laws, how is that?
A lovely story. However ...
>E: (mumble, mumble) Ehrmm ... I started the widening you wanted with a
> chorus/flanger, but before I had time to finish the job, we went
I'm pretty sure someone else is working on something like this, OSC driven
UI, modules as LADSPA plugins, cant remeber the name though.
DSSI might be better for some SSM modules, it allows bulk data transfer
from UI->plugin and a couple of other things you might need.
- Steve
On Wed, Dec 08, 200
Hi all,
Just a quick note that we are currently considering starting a new version of
spiralsynthmodular from scratch (well almost) that will at first take the form
of a osc server/jack client that will load and connect ladspa plugins together.
Just wondering if anyone has an idea of an osc prot
25 matches
Mail list logo
