Re: [linux-audio-dev] GPL concerns

2005-04-06 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:56:19 -0500 Shane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jan, > > Thank you for your comments. I should clarify from the perspective of > an independent software developer with no previous relationship to the > company issuing the NDA that may or may not be valid or legal... > > F

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Realtime convolution - a threading problem?

2005-04-06 Thread Lee Revell
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 01:33 +0200, Florian Schmidt wrote: > I _heard_ that in the US the algorithm 2 is patented. I haven't really > looked into it, since my time is limited ATM. If it is not, i might have > a shot at it at some unspecified time in the future. If you are talking about Lake DSP, th

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Realtime convolution - a threading problem?

2005-04-06 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:33:01AM +0200, Florian Schmidt wrote: > - Using convolution only for the "early reflections" and using classic > dsp based reverb tails (i don't know much about how these work though).. > > - Making use of the fact the tail is typically not having much variation > excep

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Realtime convolution - a threading problem?

2005-04-06 Thread Florian Schmidt
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:34:28 +0200 "Sune Mai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip > 2: Another approach is to split the FIR in blocks of different sizes, as can > be seen in the bottom figure of this page: > http://www.music.miami.edu/programs/mue/Research/jvandekieft/jvchapter2.htm > This approach

Re: [linux-audio-dev] GPL concerns

2005-04-06 Thread Paul Winkler
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 02:56:19PM -0500, Shane wrote: (snip) I think you need a lawyer. This is way over my head, and probably the same goes for most here. -- Paul Winkler http://www.slinkp.com

Re: [linux-audio-dev] GPL concerns

2005-04-06 Thread Jan Depner
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 18:18, Lee Revell wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 14:56 -0500, Shane wrote: > > Jan, > > > > Thank you for your comments. I should clarify from the perspective of > > an independent software developer with no previous relationship to the > > company issuing the NDA that may o

Re: [linux-audio-dev] GPL concerns

2005-04-06 Thread Jan Depner
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 14:56, Shane wrote: > Jan, > > Thank you for your comments. I should clarify from the perspective of > an independent software developer with no previous relationship to the > company issuing the NDA that may or may not be valid or legal... > > First of all, the (hypotheti

Re: [linux-audio-dev] GPL concerns

2005-04-06 Thread Lee Revell
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 14:56 -0500, Shane wrote: > Jan, > > Thank you for your comments. I should clarify from the perspective of > an independent software developer with no previous relationship to the > company issuing the NDA that may or may not be valid or legal... I don't think this arrange

Re: [linux-audio-dev] GPL concerns

2005-04-06 Thread Shane
Jan, Thank you for your comments. I should clarify from the perspective of an independent software developer with no previous relationship to the company issuing the NDA that may or may not be valid or legal... First of all, the (hypothetical) NDA requires that the copyright to any work rendere

Re: [linux-audio-dev] FOSS-tools for realtime audio analysis?

2005-04-06 Thread Albert Graef
Alfons Adriaensen wrote: Concerning the latter, does anyone know of a library that would convert an X11 pixmap (or the contents of a window) to PNG ? libMagick: http://www.imagemagick.org/ Readily available on most Linux distros. HTH, Albert -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, Universit

[linux-audio-dev] Realtime convolution - a threading problem?

2005-04-06 Thread Sune Mai
Hello! I just joined the LAD-list to get some feedback on the following topic: Convolution is really nice - I use it all the time to get perfect reverb, nice guitar amp-sound etc. The only serious drawback is the high input-output latency of simple FFT based algorithms. I'd like to see if it i

[linux-audio-dev] [Fwd: ICMC 2005 Free Sound Project]

2005-04-06 Thread Xavier Amatriain
> > I would like to invite you all to have a look at The Freesound Project. > > -> http://freesound.iua.upf.edu/ > > This project was started in the context of ICMC 2005, and is a website for > creative-commons licensed audio material exchange. If you want to know more > about the project (

Re: Re: [linux-audio-dev] FOSS-tools for realtime audio analysis?

2005-04-06 Thread Alfons Adriaensen
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:52:45PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From just taking a peek at it, I'm getting the impression that this is > mainly a graphical tool (which is really cool). Anyway, he's not afraid > of hacking if this is what he's looking for. Are features like these > anything

Re: Re: [linux-audio-dev] FOSS-tools for realtime audio analysis?

2005-04-06 Thread mathias_lundgren
> > From: Alfons Adriaensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/04/06 on PM 01:00:45 GMT > To: "The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List" > > Ämne: Re: [linux-audio-dev] FOSS-tools for realtime audio analysis? > > You may mave a look at JAAA, (JACK and ALSA Audio Analyser). This is

Re: [linux-audio-dev] FOSS-tools for realtime audio analysis?

2005-04-06 Thread carmen
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:00:45PM +0200, Alfons Adriaensen wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:32:20PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Are there any tools/libraries around which makes it possible to do > > something like this? > > > > 1) Feed an audio signal (f.ex. a sinus wave) into ex

Re: [linux-audio-dev] GPL concerns

2005-04-06 Thread eviltwin69
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:09 , Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: >On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:31:15 -0500 >Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hey everyone. I have a bland but important question for everyone. Say >> hypothetically a company is developing an audio product using lots of >> G

Re: [linux-audio-dev] FOSS-tools for realtime audio analysis?

2005-04-06 Thread Alfons Adriaensen
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:32:20PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Are there any tools/libraries around which makes it possible to do > something like this? > > 1) Feed an audio signal (f.ex. a sinus wave) into external hardware > > 2) Record the signal returned from the external hardware

[linux-audio-dev] FOSS-tools for realtime audio analysis?

2005-04-06 Thread mathias_lundgren
Hi! Are there any tools/libraries around which makes it possible to do something like this? 1) Feed an audio signal (f.ex. a sinus wave) into external hardware 2) Record the signal returned from the external hardware 3) "Compare" the two signals (realtime would be neat, if you know wha

Re: [linux-audio-dev] GPL concerns

2005-04-06 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:31:15 -0500 Shane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey everyone. I have a bland but important question for everyone. Say > hypothetically a company is developing an audio product using lots of > GPL source, but for whatever marketing reasons asks for NDA concerning > the codeb

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [OSC_dev] [PATCH] liblo & pattern matching callback

2005-04-06 Thread Dave Robillard
On Wed, 2005-06-04 at 11:08 +0100, Martin Habets wrote: > The thing is that you don't just need 1 new function in liblo, but a number > of them. > Modifying something like lo_server_new() leads to an API change, which > should IMO be prevented if possible. No, it will be done with backwards compat

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [OSC_dev] [PATCH] liblo & pattern matching callback

2005-04-06 Thread Martin Habets
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 11:14:03AM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > > > Basically we just need a lo_discover(client_id_string) method that > > > allows figuring out what clients are out there (optionally, with the > > > given name). I started to implement this but it got pushed down the > > > priori

Re: [linux-audio-dev] GPL concerns

2005-04-06 Thread Andreas Kuckartz
RTFF (Read The Fine FAQ), please. See: Does the GPL allow me to distribute a modified or beta version under a nondisclosure agreement? http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTheGPLAllowNDA Does the GPL allow me to develop a modified version under a nondisclosure agreement? http://www.gnu.o

[linux-audio-dev] GPL concerns

2005-04-06 Thread Shane
Hey everyone. I have a bland but important question for everyone. Say hypothetically a company is developing an audio product using lots of GPL source, but for whatever marketing reasons asks for NDA concerning the codebase. Lots of GPL work is referenced and at least dynamically linked, and tho

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Jacklaunch vs. asoundrc jack plugin

2005-04-06 Thread martin rumori
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:19:00PM -0400, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: > freebirth. Audacity doesn't cooperate with either, while jacklaunch even > though it has been reported to work with sweep doesn't on my machines (mdk > 10.0 and 10.1). jacklaunch(1) worked for us with realplayer, which is, i know,