On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 23:43 -0400, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
The sample tuning has been adjusted by ear, so it may not be
mathematically accurate but FWIW it did pass my own scrutiny (which should
be taken with a grain of salt as this piece is not as demanding when it
comes to absolute
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
The ensemble is off by at least 5hz occasionally. It sounds like your
oscillators are getting payed to do the job in spite of deeply hating
contemporary music.
That is the funniest formulation I have read for months.
Cheers,
Andreas
Jens M Andreasen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The violin performance is nice though :)
Could you post an url for Symmetries? Thank you. Wolfgang
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 14:49 +0200, Wolfgang Woehl wrote:
Jens M Andreasen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The violin performance is nice though :)
Could you post an url for Symmetries? Thank you. Wolfgang
It was in the parent post, which Evolution kindly preserves for me:
...
...
There are 3
Thorsten Wilms:
As the horizontal axis stands for time, i needed to express
the nesting only verticaly (plus color), so that's what the
round corners and the empty bottoms of the containers are
for. Maybe it helps when you think on Lisp and paranthesis,
only vertcaly.
Below is my (short)
The ensemble is off by at least 5hz occasionally. It sounds like your
oscillators are getting payed to do the job in spite of deeply hating
contemporary music.
Some of the detuning you hear is due to 4 pitch-shifting LADSPA plugins
which are controlled via MIDI controller. Unfortunately,
Dang, i should have dropped some words on the
reasons for the container concep :)
- Making it easy to switch instruments, effects,
routing, etc. without the need to add several
tracks (therby wasting vertical space and making
it harder to get the 'big picture'
- Allowing to include
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 16:30 +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
From: Simon Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. Is C++ OK? (You'd end up with a Patch class that could be
over-ridden to dump itself in whatever format was required).
C++ is ok, and would make sense because the nmedit code is C++.
For
hi Thorsten
looks nice.
i think its quite conventional though, albeit with the
addition of per-container tempo/timesig.
while i wouldnt use the tempo/timesig much myself, i can
see its a useful addition.
you dont say much about global horizontal or vertical
settings. By 'global vertical', i
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 05:32:59PM +0200, Tim Orford wrote:
looks nice.
Thanks.
i think its quite conventional though, albeit with the
addition of per-container tempo/timesig.
Neither being conventional nor being unconventional
has been a goal by itself for me ... ;-)
you dont say
Cost of one low-latency, sample-synchronous audio server: free!
Cost of one lisp-extensible, editor-that-thinks-its-an-OS: free!
Value of putting them together: Priceless!!
i thought i had seen everything yet. i apologize, i was wrong :))
--p
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:15:25PM +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
The absolute time / transport containers can be used for
global settings. If you want settings for a sub group to
persist through the whole arrangement (global vertical),
you would just create a container that extends from
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 07:30:56PM +0200, Tim Orford wrote:
so, just to be clear, each tempo/meter container could
contain a complete tempo/meter map, not just a single pair
of values?
Only a meter container that is not inside another meter
container can have a tempo track, as else they
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:36:16PM +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
so, just to be clear, each tempo/meter container could
contain a complete tempo/meter map, not just a single pair
of values?
Only a meter container that is not inside another meter
container can have a tempo track, as else
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 09:35:50PM +0200, Tim Orford wrote:
perhaps you might not want them in sync. And, eg, a tempo
setting of 50%, would be very handy, even for 4/4'ers like me.
If you don't want them to be in sync, just don't put
one into the other (of course there could be an option
to
On Friday 29 April 2005 18:07, Paul Davis wrote:
Cost of one low-latency, sample-synchronous audio server: free!
Cost of one lisp-extensible, editor-that-thinks-its-an-OS: free!
Value of putting them together: Priceless!!
Yeah, all that emacs is missing to be counted as a full-featured
16 matches
Mail list logo
