On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 12:59:40AM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > A sequencer is a device for recording and playback of signals
> > with the possibility to arrange several recordings.
>
> One important feature still missing might be the "edit operation".
> ...
Dang! Thanks. I do it all the
Hi Toby and All,
But from my (limited) experience I see that not only does writing a
CSound instrument require knowledge of the CSound language and of its
architecture (that's obvious), but that *incorporating* an existing
CSound instrument into a new composition requires almost the same
skills. A
Hallo,
Thorsten Wilms hat gesagt: // Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 06:57:43PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > That's actually quite a curious sentence! People have very different
> > conceptions about what a sequencer is or what it should be.
>
> As I work on the design of a
>I would probably lock on to the audio clock, in jack or otherwise, since
>this is were it all ends up ultimately.
>
>When the jack_process() gets called, count down the time to wait untill
>time is zero or less, in which case you do your midi thing and pick the
>next event.
that depends. is this
I would probably lock on to the audio clock, in jack or otherwise, since
this is were it all ends up ultimately.
When the jack_process() gets called, count down the time to wait untill
time is zero or less, in which case you do your midi thing and pick the
next event.
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 13:33
Toby wrote:
I'm still studying the solutions you people kindly gave me in my other
thread, but I thought I'd post this slightly OT spinoff in the meantime!
Dave Phillips wrote:
From the original post:
The problem is that I don't know of any software synthesizer that is:
[snip]
2. easy
Hello, About 5 years ago I hacked together a nice midi looper app. The
only problem is that it was for Windows. Anyway... I'm working towards
reimplamenting the app in linux. Basically, I have a circular linked
list of midi events. Each node has the event and the time to the next
event. In Wind
Hi all
I'm still studying the solutions you people kindly gave me in my other
thread, but I thought I'd post this slightly OT spinoff in the meantime!
:-)
Dave Phillips wrote:
> > From the original post:
> >
> > The problem is that I don't know of any software synthesizer that is:
[snip]
> > 2
Hi All,
Just thought I'd mention that my software blue
(http://www.csounds.com/stevenyi/blue) supports tuning systems with a
microtonal piano roll that reads in Scala
files(http://csounds.com/stevenyi/blue/blueDocs/html/pianoRoll.html),
and is somewhat like a sequencer application (mixing of SC
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 06:57:43PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > My sequencer is going to be just that: a sequencer.
>
> That's actually quite a curious sentence! People have very different
> conceptions about what a sequencer is or what it should be.
As I work on the design of a hardware
Hallo,
Sorry, I can't resist:
Toby hat gesagt: // Toby wrote:
> My sequencer is going to be just that: a sequencer.
That's actually quite a curious sentence! People have very different
conceptions about what a sequencer is or what it should be.
Dave Griffiths' performance at LAC2005 is just
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 18:42 +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> >From: Jens M Andreasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Suggestion for running headless:
> >
> > if(getenv("DISPLAY"))
> >isGraphic = TRUE;
> > else
> >isGraphic = FALSE;
>
> I hope there is a command line option for turning the
> G
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 13:55, James McDermott wrote:
> There is a theory which states that if anyone ever learns how to use
> all of emacs, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something
> even more bizarre and inexplicable.
> There is another theory which states that that's how vi was in
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 06:42:29 +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> >From: Jens M Andreasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Is it gtk then? Or the pixmap engine?
>
> I don't use pixmap decorations in my application, but
> only one pixmap of size 800x600 was too slow. I used
> the preferred pixmap functio
>From: Jens M Andreasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Is it gtk then? Or the pixmap engine?
I don't use pixmap decorations in my application, but
only one pixmap of size 800x600 was too slow. I used
the preferred pixmap functions of GTK2. The expose of
the whole 800x600 pixmap took 120 ms (8 fps). That w
>From: Jens M Andreasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Suggestion for running headless:
>
> if(getenv("DISPLAY"))
>isGraphic = TRUE;
> else
>isGraphic = FALSE;
I hope there is a command line option for turning the
GUI off. Otherwise I would always get the GUI.
Juhana
--
http://music.columbia
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 09:37 -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 02:14:46PM +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:55 +0300, michael tewner wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > To my awareness, the hardware synths that do microtuning can be set up
> > > > any twisted ima
>On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:57:56AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> >To add my 0.02 Euro : I'm sure that OSC is the way to go for this project.
>> >And I'd love to have an 'OSC sequencer' -- something that allows you to
>> >schedule / edit / manipulate arbitrary OSC events, and with a non-destructi
>
El lun, 02-05-2005 a las 14:20, Robert Jonsson escribió:
> Hi David,
>
> I think this is best handled by each individual. it's also easier on the
> admins.
>
> Try visiting this page:
> http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/subscribelad.php
>
> There's a link for unsubscription if you scroll down.
>
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 02:14:46PM +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:55 +0300, michael tewner wrote:
>
> > >
> > > To my awareness, the hardware synths that do microtuning can be set up
> > > any twisted imaginable way. You might have to look one page further down
> > > tho
Alfons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:36:29AM -0400, Dave Phillips wrote:
Considering its suitability for microtonality, why not design
something around Csound ?
From the origianl post:
The problem is that I don't know of any software synthesizer that is:
1. good enough f
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:57:56AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >To add my 0.02 Euro : I'm sure that OSC is the way to go for this project.
> >And I'd love to have an 'OSC sequencer' -- something that allows you to
> >schedule / edit / manipulate arbitrary OSC events, and with a non-destructive
> >r
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 06:00:03AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > To add my 0.02 Euro : I'm sure that OSC is the way to go for this project.
> > And I'd love to have an 'OSC sequencer' -- something that allows you to
> > schedule / edit / manipulate arbitrary OSC events, and with a
> > non-des
> The problem is that I don't know of any software synthesizer that is:
> 1. good enough for decent music production;
> 2. easy to use by non-experts (this is a direct stab at CSound, or
>better at its lack of a decent GUI, of a standard instrument exchange
>file format and of a decent, ce
> To add my 0.02 Euro : I'm sure that OSC is the way to go for this project.
> And I'd love to have an 'OSC sequencer' -- something that allows you to
> schedule / edit / manipulate arbitrary OSC events, and with a
> non-destructive
> region editor similar to Ardour's.
An OSC sequencer would have
>To add my 0.02 Euro : I'm sure that OSC is the way to go for this project.
>And I'd love to have an 'OSC sequencer' -- something that allows you to
>schedule / edit / manipulate arbitrary OSC events, and with a non-destructive
>region editor similar to Ardour's.
Ardour v2.3 ...
> Greetings:
>
> Considering its suitability for microtonality, why not design
> something around Csound ?
The best solution is to remove the mapping from note number to frequency,
and directly send the frequency to the synth. I use OSC messages to do
this (my sequencer uses the scala tuning for
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:36:29AM -0400, Dave Phillips wrote:
> Considering its suitability for microtonality, why not design
> something around Csound ?
>From the origianl post:
> The problem is that I don't know of any software synthesizer that is:
>
> 1. good enough for decent music produc
Greetings:
Considering its suitability for microtonality, why not design
something around Csound ?
Best,
dp
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 08:18 -0400, Dave Phillips wrote:
> Hi Jens:
>
> What version of GTK2 does Mx44 need ? My attempt at compiling results
> in this error:
>
> gcc -c -O3 -Wall -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -D_REENTRANT `pkg-config
> --cflags gtk+-2.0` interface2.c
> interface2.c:148: parse
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:55 +0300, michael tewner wrote:
> >
> > To my awareness, the hardware synths that do microtuning can be set up
> > any twisted imaginable way. You might have to look one page further down
> > though, to get past the 12 note/octave convenience setup.
>
> THere was a piece
Hi Jens:
What version of GTK2 does Mx44 need ? My attempt at compiling results
in this error:
gcc -c -O3 -Wall -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -D_REENTRANT `pkg-config
--cflags gtk+-2.0` interface2.c
interface2.c:148: parse error before '*' token
interface2.c:148: warning: type defaults to `int'
> On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 23:01 +0200, Toby wrote:
>
>
> > Please correct me if I'm wrong: MIDI doesn't allow for microtonal notes.
> > The best next things MIDI has to offer are Custom Scales and Pitch Bend.
> >
> > Custom Scales is not a feature of MIDI, it'smore like a reinterpreta-
> > tion of t
> There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the
> Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be
> replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.
>
> There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
>
> -- Dou
Hi!
As you might know, the initial phase relation between oscillators in an
FM synth is quite important for the resulting sound. Not least when you
are dealing with feedback loops.
I have had velocity sensitivity on phase for ages, but came to think of
that keyfollow on phase might be more usefu
35 matches
Mail list logo
