On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:16:43 +0100, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:56, Dave Robillard wrote:
So why wasn't the unique ID the thing to use?
Because it's impossible to find any way to guarantee it's actually
unique, for example in the case of a wrapper plugin that
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:19:58 +0100, Mike Rawes wrote:
So why wasn't the unique ID the thing to use? There is a unique plugin
ID in LADSPA, if not for this then for what reason?
Going by what is said on ladspa.org, I think that it was originally intended
to
be the way to refer to
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 03:19:50 +1000, Dave Robillard wrote:
(I still think the central repository is a good idea anyway, FWIW)
So do I, but its a hell of a lot of effort, and its unlikly to be kept
up to date.
In the commercial world (of one application I develop for anyway) a number
of
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 11:03 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 03:19:50 +1000, Dave Robillard wrote:
(I still think the central repository is a good idea anyway, FWIW)
So do I, but its a hell of a lot of effort, and its unlikly to be kept
up to date.
In the
The Realtime Extension for the sound editor SND consists of two parts:
1. The RT Engine - An engine for doing realtime signal processing.
2. The RT Compiler - A compiler for a scheme-like programming language
to generate realtime-safe code understood by the
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 01:31:16 +0100, Simon Jenkins wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 11:03 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 03:19:50 +1000, Dave Robillard wrote:
(I still think the central repository is a good idea anyway, FWIW)
So do I, but its a hell of a lot of
