On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 16:59 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
Enter gcc version 3, which drops multi-line inline assembly support.
Enter gcc version 4, which requires the templated types' constructor
code be rewritten in the most nonsensical, misleading and ugly fashion
I've been maintaining my
Hi,
cool news about the echo canceller.
some questions:
I've found this algorithm on the web (but I did not test it)
http://home.arcor.de/andreadrian/echo_cancel/draft-aec-03.txt
How do you think your's and the one above compare quality wise ?
Do linux telephony apps like linphone,
Es geschah am Sonntag 05 Juni 2005 04:18 als Erik de Castro Lopo schrieb:
I also find Ocaml a better high level language than Python because
it is strictly and statically typed as well as compiling to native
binaries which come close to the speed of C. The (very flawed IMO)
language shootout
Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
Es geschah am Sonntag 05 Juni 2005 04:18 als Erik de Castro Lopo schrieb:
I also find Ocaml a better high level language than Python because
it is strictly and statically typed as well as compiling to native
binaries which come close to the speed of C. The
[Erik de Castro Lopo]
Tim Goetze wrote:
To be honest, I don't know if it's undefined behaviour; I don't read
ISO compiler ABI standards (if they exist in the first place). I was
simply trusting that common sense would always allow this
cross-language subclassing, apparently I was wrong.
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:12:06PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
It should be noted that the benchmark attempts to use the technique
most approriate for the language. So, for the count words example,
the C++ version uses std::vector from of the STL:
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 15:08 +0200, fons adriaensen wrote:
My aproach to C++ is very simple: I use it as 'C with classes'. No streams, no
STL, no other nonsense. Gives me the best of both worlds - clean objects and
low level.
Same here, except;
- exceptions make error handling simpler and
Greetings:
I've prepared a brief report on LAC 2005 for the Linux Journal, it's
ready for submission but I need an outside photo of ZKM + the Kubus. Did
anyone take a nice shot of the buildings that they'd like to see in LJ ?
If so, let me know asap. A TIFF is preferred, but high-resolution
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 08:08, fons adriaensen wrote:
My aproach to C++ is very simple: I use it as 'C with classes'. No streams, no
STL, no other nonsense. Gives me the best of both worlds - clean objects and
low level.
Good answer. I've often wondered why anyone would use vectors. I
[Jussi Laako]
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 15:08 +0200, fons adriaensen wrote:
My aproach to C++ is very simple: I use it as 'C with classes'. No streams, no
STL, no other nonsense. Gives me the best of both worlds - clean objects and
low level.
Same here, except;
- exceptions make error handling
Es geschah am Sonntag 05 Juni 2005 14:12 als Erik de Castro Lopo schrieb:
Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
Es geschah am Sonntag 05 Juni 2005 04:18 als Erik de Castro Lopo schrieb:
I also find Ocaml a better high level language than Python because
it is strictly and statically typed as well
Le dimanche 05 juin 2005 à 13:01 +0200, Benno Senoner a écrit :
Hi,
cool news about the echo canceller.
some questions:
I've found this algorithm on the web (but I did not test it)
http://home.arcor.de/andreadrian/echo_cancel/draft-aec-03.txt
How do you think your's and the one above
The ever popular CAPS Audio Plugin Suite reincarnates as v0.2.3, a
maintenance release that rectifies the last remaining denormal
problems and restores the intermittently nonfunctional AmpIV gain
control to its usual fine form.
CAPS is a LADSPA library that enjoys worldwide favour for its
For a small application I am developing, I need to display waveforms
(read-only) from audio data loaded into my application using libsndfile.
My question is about displaying a waveform in a GUI window -- I have
searched around the net looking for general algorithms but haven't seen
anything that
Good answer. I've often wondered why anyone would use vectors.
Because you don't need to worry about their deletion ? Granted that for
pure audio processing programming, it is not really useful, and a bit
dangerous.
I always though myself that vector are slower than C array if use
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:13:21AM +1000, Luke Yelavich wrote:
Some distros, like Slackware do not use pam. How could this patch still
be used?
I've written a small setuid utility which gives access to the new resource
limits on an otherwise unpatched system (so long as a kernel with the new
16 matches
Mail list logo
