Maarten de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> any advice on what would be the best kernel options when using ingo
> molnar's patch for an audio setup?
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a
http://www. s tn m
irc://irc. b -
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 14:14 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am trying to correct some factual errors in wikipedia regarding FM
> synthesis (aka phase modulation.)
>
> The page in qustion is here:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_modulation_synthesis
>
> My current correction
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 13:52, Maarten De Boer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> > > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT: Complete Preemption (Real-Time)
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > AFAIK this one.
>
> Hm, I am currently trying PREEMPT_DESKTOP.
> I got the impression _RT would be a bit of overkill for audio
> List archives. There's no point documenting it because it's developing
> too fast.
Ok. I gave up following the whole discussing on LKML because it was too
fast :-)
> If your distro has a 2.6.12 kernel available, you need to file a bug
> report against PAM to support this new kernel feature.
> There's absolutely no need for the sound server, it's just
> bloat.
Maybe. But I think at the time where the soundservers have
been introduced it was a wise decision.
If KDE and Gnome choose to support Gstreamer in the future, it
will be more than just a soundserver. AFAIK it can also share
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:43:39 +0200
Christoph Eckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I know my opinion is unpopular, but afaik OSS is more of a
> > standard in the unix (not linux) world than ALSA is.
> > There's no way around providing an OSS emulation that works
> > (i mean sw mixing, etc.) for
> Hm, I am currently trying PREEMPT_DESKTOP.
> I got the impression _RT would be a bit of overkill for
> audio work.
AFAIK PREEMPT_DESKTOP was introduced early in the 2.6 series.
If it was enough, we didn't discuss about low latency
anymore, but we do ;-) .
For audio work, a latency of more th
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 20:52 +, Maarten De Boer wrote:
> > Unfortunately, I also try to get decent audio on my 2.6.12
> > machine but it seems to be tricky.
> >
> > After enabling the above option and kernel installation, you
> > need to patch PAM and configure it accordingly or you need to
> >
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 22:35 +0200, Christoph Eckert wrote:
> > > the thread, the sound
> > > daemons will automagically cease to exist once
> > > developpers realize there
> > > is no need for them. But it would be good to speed
> > > up the process.
> >
> > YES to that :-).
>
> The desktop sound
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT: Complete Preemption (Real-Time)
>
> [...]
>
> AFAIK this one.
Hm, I am currently trying PREEMPT_DESKTOP.
I got the impression _RT would be a bit of overkill for audio work.
> Unfortunately, I also try to get decent audio on my 2.6.12
> mach
> For now, I would like your opinion on the issue. Do you
> agree that such a document would be feasible and useful,
> and that the proposed structure/contents make sense?
Yes and no. I think that I simply needed too long until I
understood using linux audio systems. So such a document
would be
> Why don't you ask the Skype developers when they plan to
> support ALSA?
I did and got (surprise, surprise :) no response...
Best regards
ce
> I know my opinion is unpopular, but afaik OSS is more of a
> standard in the unix (not linux) world than ALSA is.
> There's no way around providing an OSS emulation that works
> (i mean sw mixing, etc.) for all those OSS apps that are
> multiplatform.
Most of these applications use /dev/dsp. Wo
> > the thread, the sound
> > daemons will automagically cease to exist once
> > developpers realize there
> > is no need for them. But it would be good to speed
> > up the process.
>
> YES to that :-).
The desktop soundservers will not disappear. KDE also runs on
other platforms than Linux and
> any advice on what would be the best kernel options
> when using ingo molnar's patch for an audio setup?
[...]
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT: Complete Preemption (Real-Time)
[...]
AFAIK this one.
Unfortunately, I also try to get decent audio on my 2.6.12
machine but it seems to be tricky.
Afte
Janina Sajka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Since I finally ordered my Multiface, I also started to write
>> a small program which I am going to need since hdspconf and hdspmixer
>> are both GUI only.
>>
>> The idea:
>> hdsposc will offer the RME mixer and the metering functionality
>> via OSC.
>
16 matches
Mail list logo