On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 01:02:47AM +0300, Jussi Laako wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 23:14 +0400, Dmitry S. Baikov wrote:
> > Jackd needs buffers to be power of 2, and usb-audio - multiples of 1ms.
>
> I just verified jack to work with any buffer size using OSS backend.
Jack normally requires 2^n
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 23:14 +0400, Dmitry S. Baikov wrote:
> Jackd needs buffers to be power of 2, and usb-audio - multiples of 1ms.
I just verified jack to work with any buffer size using OSS backend.
--
Jussi Laako <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 23:14 +0400, Dmitry S. Baikov wrote:
> Jackd needs buffers to be power of 2, and usb-audio - multiples of 1ms.
I don't think there is any hard limit in jack for buffer size to be 2^x.
(?)
--
Jussi Laako <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all,
I'm just about to go on holidays with my family. While I'm away I will
have a little time here and there to meet up with some friendly linux
audio types.
I'm be in the following places on the following dates:
London UK2-16 Oct
Newcastle UK 16-19 Oct
Copenhagen DK
Yes, the FA-101 works but I can't tell you the numbers for latency.
The site has a nice table of working setups, but no user emails. I'd ask
them directly.
What do you mean with restristrions on buffers (=latency?)?
AFAIK, usb cards impose 48kHz (96), 48/3 buffer setup to please
everybody
Hi!
All you lips-guys: I don't mean to be rude, but: Mario says, that all who
don't like lisp, are those, who don't know (or don't understand) it. And in
the case of extending ardour, that's just the point. I know a lot of people,
who have a lot of dificulties to use scheme-languages, yet concern
Quoting Jussi Laako <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 09:04 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Returning to one of my original questions. Does anyone have any
> suggestions for
> > useful libraries or example source code to study as a start for this
> project?
>
> If you like C++, th
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 00:11 +0200, Richard Spindler wrote:
> > I don't see any difference between ATI and nVidia. Both provide
>
> The difference is that the free ATI driver supports hardware accelerated 3D.
Not for any reasonably recent GPU, like RV3xx or RV4xx series.
http://www.x.org/X11R6.8.
As for FW solution, FreeBob project's site states FA-101 works, but
I'd like to know about minimal possible latency. And does it have any
restrictions on buffers/frequency setup?
Yes, the FA-101 works but I can't tell you the numbers for latency. What
do you mean with restristrions on buffer
