Re: [linux-audio-dev] NPTL jack+ardour: large memlock required

2005-11-24 Thread Jonathan Woithe
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:10:05 +1030 (CST) > Jonathan Woithe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One thing I will try next is recompiling ardour; perhaps there's something > > funny there. In any case though, does any of this ring a bell with anyone? > > Did you try the --unlock jack switch? Um, n

Re: [linux-audio-dev] NPTL jack+ardour: large memlock required (was: Jack and NPTL (again?))

2005-11-24 Thread Florian Schmidt
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:10:05 +1030 (CST) Jonathan Woithe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing I will try next is recompiling ardour; perhaps there's something > funny there. In any case though, does any of this ring a bell with anyone? Did you try the --unlock jack switch? Flo -- Palimm Pal

[linux-audio-dev] NPTL jack+ardour: large memlock required (was: Jack and NPTL (again?))

2005-11-24 Thread Jonathan Woithe
Hi On Tues Nov 22 I wrote: > I've recently moved a system over to Slackware 10.2 which utilises NPTL and > I'm aware of the issues NPTL has raised in the past. Based on a comment on > the Jack website though I sort of assumed that things were now in hand and > that Jack had a workaround in place

[linux-audio-dev] Echo Gina3G

2005-11-24 Thread conrad berhörster
Hello all, sorry for crossposting. Is there any experience with the Echo Gina3G card. link: http://www.echoaudio.com/Products/PCI/Gina3G/ thanks c~

Re: [linux-audio-dev] xruns

2005-11-24 Thread conrad berhörster
Hallo Paul, Am Mittwoch 23 November 2005 14:54 schrieb Paul Davis: > > > where do the effects you are using come from? also, 60% CPU is actually > not far from the threshold where xruns start to become predictable. the > best measure of how hard your system is working comes from the JACK "DSP > l