On Sunday 01 January 2006 19.20, fons adriaensen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 06:42:02PM +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote:
> > Indeed, there are several issues at work here...
> > In anycase, MusE has from 0.7.2pre2 a fix that enables synths with
> > identical names to be used.
> > Also, in the case
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 06:42:02PM +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote:
> Indeed, there are several issues at work here...
> In anycase, MusE has from 0.7.2pre2 a fix that enables synths with identical
> names to be used.
> Also, in the case with ZynAdd, another option is to use only one instance.
> Zyn
Hi Bill,
On Sunday 01 January 2006 17.13, Bill Allen wrote:
> Hi. I'm writing to the list as opposed to the individual app owners
> since I can't really tell where the bug is. I have a sequence in which I
> want to use zynaddsubfx as the bass and another instance of zynaddsubfx
> for synth strings
Hi. I'm writing to the list as opposed to the individual app owners
since I can't really tell where the bug is. I have a sequence in which I
want to use zynaddsubfx as the bass and another instance of zynaddsubfx
for synth strings. The problem that I see is when I add the base
instance to the b
On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 13:18:09 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > in a low latency *live* system, "timing" doesn't really exist outside of
> > the current period. there is no concept of "when" that exists beyond the
> > end of the current period.
> to remove jitter i would delay all events i reciv
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 08:03:06AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 00:04 +0100, fons adriaensen wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 05:10:44PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 22:27 +0100, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> > > > On Friday 30 December 2005 17:37, We
