Re: [linux-audio-dev] multiface latency question

2006-04-07 Thread Jan Weil
Am Donnerstag, den 06.04.2006, 20:52 +0200 schrieb fons adriaensen: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:28:32PM +0200, Jan Weil wrote: 206.805 This is a Thinkpad T43 with an unpatched 2.6.16 with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y, jackd 0.100.7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now what does that value tell me? These are

Re: [linux-audio-dev] debugging xruns

2006-04-07 Thread Jan Weil
Am Donnerstag, den 06.04.2006, 20:52 +0200 schrieb fons adriaensen: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:28:32PM +0200, Jan Weil wrote: This is a Thinkpad T43 with an unpatched 2.6.16 with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y, jackd 0.100.7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have you been able to use -p 64 with 2.6.16 on the Thinkpad

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread Matthias Koenig
Albert Graef [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lee Revell wrote: I heard from someone at Ableton that one guy wrote the Live engine in about 3 months. He must be a great hacker. :) But the engine is probably only a small part of the program. Getting the UI right is an entirely different issue.

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread Matthias Koenig
Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And, I don't think it's fair to call it McMusic - all I use Live for is an effects host for my guitar, because I like the builtin effects and it has by far the best interface of any audio app. Ack. The reason why Live has so much success is simply that the

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread Dmitry Baikov
I can re-write Ableton Live with qt, and even make it fast in python (which escapes the linux-only concept, mind you :)) - that's not hard. What is hard is finding an engine that lets me focus on my GUI as opposed to the engine or *anything* related to communicating with the engine (besides

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread David Olofson
On Thursday 06 April 2006 23:59, Lee Revell wrote: On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 21:45 +, carmen wrote: SC and Chuck: would likely work as well, but AFAIK neither one supports LADSPA or DSSI at the moment, SCLang definitely doesnt work on x86_64, and Chuck segfaulted as well but i'm

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread Dave Robillard
On Thu, 2006-06-04 at 21:45 +, carmen wrote: I heard from someone at Ableton that one guy wrote the Live engine in about 3 months. yeah its not that complex. all you need is something that can play audio files realtime at varying pitches/speeds and apply FX chains, and a GUI to

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread Dave Robillard
On Thu, 2006-06-04 at 17:59 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 21:45 +, carmen wrote: SC and Chuck: would likely work as well, but AFAIK neither one supports LADSPA or DSSI at the moment, SCLang definitely doesnt work on x86_64, and Chuck segfaulted as well but i'm

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread torbenh
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:24:24PM +0200, David Olofson wrote: On Thursday 06 April 2006 23:59, Lee Revell wrote: On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 21:45 +, carmen wrote: SC and Chuck: would likely work as well, but AFAIK neither one supports LADSPA or DSSI at the moment, SCLang definitely

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread Lee Revell
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 13:43 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: Apps really don't have to be designed with 64 bit compatibility in mind - it should be rather simple to port them. You'd be surprised at the shit people come up with ;) -Wall should not be optional http://www.thedailywtf.com/

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread Albert Graef
Dave Robillard wrote: I've been toying with the idea of adding support for gstreamer sources... I also have a Q module for gstreamer on my TODO list (more geared towards video playback and editing, though). Has anyone tried gstreamer lately? Is it usable? Does the API still change a lot?

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread David Olofson
On Friday 07 April 2006 19:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Basically, just don't assume that a pointer is 32 bits, and you're but those bytecode interpreters of pd and such just assume, that int and pointer are the same size... Yeah, it's tempting to do it that way... I'm not doing any

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread Patrick Stinson
As an added note to my previous comments, I really like the app interface that mpd uses. Writing ascii events using some spec or another to a file descriptor (socket in mpd's case) seems to be a terrific way to communicated with apps and libs. I run the svn pksampler like this: pksampler |

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread carmen
On Fri Apr 07, 2006 at 11:22:48PM +0200, Albert Graef wrote: Dave Robillard wrote: I've been toying with the idea of adding support for gstreamer sources... I also have a Q module for gstreamer on my TODO list (more geared towards video playback and editing, though). Has anyone tried

[linux-audio-dev] [ANN] netjack-0.11rc5

2006-04-07 Thread torbenh
netjack-0.11rc5 Some pieces of Code which can deliver you the full jackd experience with multiple Computers. Links JackPorts via generic IP networks. The alsa_in and alsa_out client can connect jackd to an unrelated alsa Soundcard. And their algorithm has been improved. Also downsampling and

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread Paul Davis
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 14:23 -0800, Patrick Stinson wrote: As an added note to my previous comments, I really like the app interface that mpd uses. Writing ascii events using some spec or another to a file descriptor (socket in mpd's case) seems to be a terrific way to communicated with apps

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread Lee Revell
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 03:04 +, carmen wrote: what advantage does it serve other than insulating yourself against the external API (ALSA dying in 6 months? i think not..) I found this very interesting: http://lurkertech.com/linuxvideoio.html It seems as if ALSA+JACK does exactly what

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] music engine

2006-04-07 Thread Patrick Stinson
On 4/7/06, Paul Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 14:23 -0800, Patrick Stinson wrote: As an added note to my previous comments, I really like the app interface that mpd uses. Writing ascii events using some spec or another to a file descriptor (socket in mpd's case) seems