On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 12:08 +0100, Gordonjcp wrote:
> What's the consensus? Implement patch storage for plugins that don't
> really have that many controls, or just let the host worry about it?
I suppose it depends on whether you want to be able to ship some presets
with the plugin and have pres
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:08:19 +0100
Gordonjcp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the consensus? Implement patch storage for plugins that don't
> really have that many controls, or just let the host worry about it?
Dunno, if there's concencus, but i'd say, let the host worry about it.
There's ma
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:27:04AM +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 01:05 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 23:22 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > Work is underway in improving the latency for big channel counts,
> > > like 24in / 24out. There seem
What's the consensus? Implement patch storage for plugins that don't
really have that many controls, or just let the host worry about it?
Gordon.
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 01:05 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 23:22 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Work is underway in improving the latency for big channel counts,
> > like 24in / 24out. There seems to be a bottleneck in the kernels
> > handling of big UDP Packets.
>
> N
