On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 20:26 -0400, Jesse Chappell wrote:
> GMPI
Heh. How about AEMPI - Actually Existant Media Plugin Interface
-DR-
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:00:36AM -0500, grae wrote:
> Agreed here, I vote to keep Ladspa. Change the acronym meaning or
> forget it entirely if desired. Lad'spa is easy to say and we all know
> what it is. :)
Yep, ladspa is just embedded in my brain. Change the 's' to super (as in
meta) if you
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:02:20AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> Discusson seems to have slowwed down a bit, so I went through the list
> archive and pulled out all the names:
>
> apa chap clap eep fap ladspa2 pea peep peeper rap sax wasap xap
xap>rap>peep
Conrad.
GMPI
Hey, Plux is a good one! Linux reference but not too obvious... and fun
to use (okay now I'm gonna fill this synth here with all the PLUX and
now see how it SOUDNDDDZ :)
Plux > APA > LADSPA2
Carlo
On Thu Apr 27, 2006 at 09:12:52PM +0200, Leonard paniq Ritter wrote:
> ok, here's my vote.
>
> openplux>plux>ladspa2
does DSSI get its own name? i was going to vote for XAP/LAP/SIN or something,
but as VST and AU both consider instruments and filters part of the same
family..
LADISSY? LDY? SPI
Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> apa chap clap eep fap ladspa2 pea peep peeper rap sax wasap xap
Out of this list; doesn't PEEP scream at you?;).
It's a recursive acronym, it's cute and it's funny.
A name does wonders.
It's even backwards compatible.
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PRO
ladspa>lapa>plux>xap
ok, here's my vote.
openplux>plux>ladspa2
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 11:36 -0700, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> I vote for "LADSPA" as well.
>
--
-- leonard "paniq" ritter
-- http://www.mjoo.org
-- http://www.paniq.org
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 10:37 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> May be Plux ? say like plux is plugin llibrary
Your search - openplux - did not match any documents.
> > Uwe
> >
--
-- leonard "paniq" ritter
-- http://www.mjoo.org
-- http://www.paniq.org
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 05:13 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 09:45 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa2/
> >
> > Removed the :logarithmic hint, I agree with Paul, its not
> > fit-for-purpose as specified.
>
> er, I need logarithmic. if it's not fit-for-
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 06:02 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> Yes, but sounds a bit fruit flavoured to me, too close to AudioUnit.
>
> On the wordy front we could have FreePlug/OpenPlug or something, but its
> bit dull.
actually something like Open* wouldnt be bad. OpenAP.
>
> - Steve
--
-- leonar
I vote for "LADSPA" as well.
ladspa2>plux
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:02:20AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> Discusson seems to have slowwed down a bit, so I went through the list
> archive and pulled out all the names:
>
> apa chap clap eep fap ladspa2 pea peep peeper rap sax wasap xap
>
>
>
> I vetoed ape and meep as t
Has this list recently changed from a developer list to list for
marketing personnel, that has to decide about product
names and logos? ;-)
Ladspa is ok because it does not have too many clashes with other names.
If at all a name change, then LAPA = linux audio plugin api.
Lapa is easy to prono
On Apr 27, 2006, at 3:12 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:13:24 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 09:45 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa2/
Removed the :logarithmic hint, I agree with Paul, its not
fit-for-purpose as specified.
er, I ne
On 4/27/06, Cedric Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Dave Phillips wrote:
>
> > Jan Weil wrote:
> >
> > >On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 08:23 -0400, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>>TPAFKAL
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>Probably be funnier if I had any clue what that meant;)
> > >>
>
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 07:00:42AM -0400, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> My vote is to keep LADSPA. I just dont see enough reason to change it.
+1.
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
I agree. I vote to keep Ladspa too.
André Magoo
Em Quinta 27 Abril 2006 13:00, grae escreveu:
> Agreed here, I vote to keep Ladspa. Change the acronym meaning or
> forget it entirely if desired. Lad'spa is easy to say and we all know
> what it is. :)
>
Agreed here, I vote to keep Ladspa. Change the acronym meaning or
forget it entirely if desired. Lad'spa is easy to say and we all know
what it is. :)
On 4/27/06, Cedric Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Dave Phillips wrote:
>
> > Jan Weil wrote:
> >
> > >On Thu, 2006-04-27
That's true. But it wouldn't be the same. The main .org
site would jump to the top, but then you'd have 5 pages of saxaphones
and sax parsers before you hit joe blow's blog about sax plugins.
Maybe its not that important. Just my thoughts :)
On 4/27/06, Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Dave Phillips wrote:
> Jan Weil wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 08:23 -0400, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>TPAFKAL
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Probably be funnier if I had any clue what that meant;)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Remember the Prince story? TAFKAP?
> >
> >(The Plu
Jan Weil wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 08:23 -0400, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
TPAFKAL
Probably be funnier if I had any clue what that meant;)
Remember the Prince story? TAFKAP?
(The Plugin Api Formerly Known As Ladspa)
Talk about sad: I sat here and wondered "What prince is h
Remember the Prince story? TAFKAP?
(The Plugin Api Formerly Known As Ladspa)
Oi
Seablade
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 08:23 -0400, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> > TPAFKAL
>
> Probably be funnier if I had any clue what that meant;)
Remember the Prince story? TAFKAP?
(The Plugin Api Formerly Known As Ladspa)
TPAFKAL
Probably be funnier if I had any clue what that meant;)
Seablade
xap>apa>ladspa2
peep and limp have unfortunate connotations in English!
peeper>peep>apa
Taybin
On Apr 27, 2006, at 5:02 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
Discusson seems to have slowwed down a bit, so I went through the list
archive and pulled out all the names:
apa chap clap eep fap ladspa2 pea peep peeper rap sax wasap xap
I vetoed ape and meep as the name clashes
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 07:46 -0400, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> Personally I consider it drop the acronym. Just call it LADSPA. It is
> pronounceable on its own as has been mentioned, and why the heck does
> everything in Linux/Open Source HAVE to be an acronym?
>
> So to clarify, if there is a p
Ditto. It's easily pronounceable. it has a high Google profile, and it's been
in extensive use.
OTOH, if it's not "simple" anymore I understand the need for a change.
Personally I consider it drop the acronym. Just call it LADSPA. It is
pronounceable on its own as has been mentioned, an
Here's my variants
LiMP - Linux/Libre Media Plugin
LAM - Linux Audio Module
LAMA - Linux Audio Module Architecture
LADSPA is already long to write and the DSP bit is weird to pronounce
in any language I know. An additional '2' would only make it longer
and weirder. Call me lazy.
As long as it is not a common word or acronym, like sax or pea, any
choice can probably rank high in google in little time.
Thus my
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:14 +0200, Luis Garrido wrote:
> The RDF stuff is looking more and more arcane and hairy with each
> iteration, with all those colons, periods and quotes, plus some
> SQL'ish for good measure. Human readable? I begin to miss the
> syntactic simplicity of only using angled br
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 07:06:03AM -0400, Dave Phillips wrote:
> Thomas Vecchione wrote:
>
> >My vote is to keep LADSPA. I just dont see enough reason to change it.
> >
> > Seablade
> >
> Ditto. It's easily pronounceable. it has a high Google profile, and it's
> been in extensive use.
>
> O
On 4/27/06, Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Discusson seems to have slowwed down a bit, so I went through the list
> archive and pulled out all the names:
>
> apa chap clap eep fap ladspa2 pea peep peeper rap sax wasap xap
>
>
>
> I vetoed ape and meep as the name clashes are too clo
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:12 +0200, Lars Luthman wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 07:00 -0400, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> > My vote is to keep LADSPA. I just dont see enough reason to change it.
>
> Mine too.
>
> LADSPA>>>APA>SAX
And when I say LADSPA I mean LADSPA2, of course.
--
Lars Luthman
PG
The RDF stuff is looking more and more arcane and hairy with each
iteration, with all those colons, periods and quotes, plus some
SQL'ish for good measure. Human readable? I begin to miss the
syntactic simplicity of only using angled brackets in XML. Sigh, not
another syntax to learn, please.
Luis
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 07:00 -0400, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> My vote is to keep LADSPA. I just dont see enough reason to change it.
Mine too.
LADSPA>>>APA>SAX
--
Lars Luthman
PGP key: http://www.student.nada.kth.se/~d00-llu/pgp_key.php
Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A E1B3 4371 4650
Thomas Vecchione wrote:
My vote is to keep LADSPA. I just dont see enough reason to change it.
Seablade
Ditto. It's easily pronounceable. it has a high Google profile, and it's
been in extensive use.
OTOH, if it's not "simple" anymore I understand the need for a change.
Best,
dp
My vote is to keep LADSPA. I just dont see enough reason to change it.
Seablade
Hi Joern,
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 00:11 +0200, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
> yes, if all goes well. we will not have time to edit them, but if
> someone volunteers, we can upload the raw dumps immediately after they
> are done, in 30min chunks. any takers?
I've been working on a graphical lossless o
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:37:34 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 27. April 2006 11:02 schrieb Steve Harris:
> > > Discusson seems to have slowwed down a bit, so I went through the list
> > > archive and pulled out all the names:
> > >
> > > apa chap clap eep fap ladspa2 pea peep
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:19:21 +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:02:20AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
>
> > apa chap clap eep fap ladspa2 pea peep peeper rap sax wasap xap
> >
> > To see if theres early consensus lets run a condorcet vote on the options.
> > If everyone po
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:13:24 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 09:45 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa2/
> >
> > Removed the :logarithmic hint, I agree with Paul, its not
> > fit-for-purpose as specified.
>
> er, I need logarithmic. if it's not fit
> Am Donnerstag, 27. April 2006 11:02 schrieb Steve Harris:
> > Discusson seems to have slowwed down a bit, so I went through the list
> > archive and pulled out all the names:
> >
> > apa chap clap eep fap ladspa2 pea peep peeper rap sax wasap xap
>
> sax is the "Simple API fo XML" (despite all t
Am Donnerstag, 27. April 2006 11:02 schrieb Steve Harris:
> Discusson seems to have slowwed down a bit, so I went through the list
> archive and pulled out all the names:
>
> apa chap clap eep fap ladspa2 pea peep peeper rap sax wasap xap
sax is the "Simple API fo XML" (despite all the other meani
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:02:20AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> apa chap clap eep fap ladspa2 pea peep peeper rap sax wasap xap
>
> To see if theres early consensus lets run a condorcet vote on the options.
> If everyone posts thier preference in order seperated by >, eg.
> foo>bar>baz
lad
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 09:45 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa2/
>
> Removed the :logarithmic hint, I agree with Paul, its not
> fit-for-purpose as specified.
er, I need logarithmic. if it's not fit-for-purpose as specified then
we can specify it differently. it's in ladsp
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:02:20 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> Discusson seems to have slowwed down a bit, so I went through the list
> archive and pulled out all the names:
>
> apa chap clap eep fap ladspa2 pea peep peeper rap sax wasap xap
>
>
My vote is:
sax>eep>xap
- Steve
Discusson seems to have slowwed down a bit, so I went through the list
archive and pulled out all the names:
apa chap clap eep fap ladspa2 pea peep peeper rap sax wasap xap
I vetoed ape and meep as the name clashes are too close.
To see if theres early consensus lets run a condorcet vote o
http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa2/
Removed the :logarithmic hint, I agree with Paul, its not
fit-for-purpose as specified.
I'm now using the DOAP schema (http://usefulinc.com/doap) instead of Dublin
Core for software information, much more appropriate.
Fixed a load of typos in the schema and examples
51 matches
Mail list logo
