So:
I have visited six motnhs ago the freebob site and became very curious
about Quatafire 610 under linux...
The site has not changed to much since then. Any news?
It would be a very nice interface to use in any system. (linux, mac,
win...) I have particular interest in intercative music on Pu
On 6/2/06, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have a link to a reference about making apps with real
time priority capabilities?
I figure I can just look at jack but it would be nice see some
tutorial, to learn what is actually happening/necessary, trade-offs,
etc.
thanks,
Alex Norman
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 10:06 -0700, Alex wrote:
> Does anyone have a link to a reference about making apps with real
> time priority capabilities?
As such there is no difference between an RT app and a not RT app,
except that the former varity might not work as advocated
> I figure I can just
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 09:42 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:09:33 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > I'm a bit unhappy that it makes code longer and more messy though. The
> > primary design goal here is to make host code as terse and simple as
> > possible. strcmp'ing a str
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 10:06 -0700, Alex wrote:
> Does anyone have a link to a reference about making apps with real
> time priority capabilities?
> I figure I can just look at jack but it would be nice see some
> tutorial, to learn what is actually happening/necessary, trade-offs,
> etc.
The quest
Does anyone have a link to a reference about making apps with real
time priority capabilities?
I figure I can just look at jack but it would be nice see some
tutorial, to learn what is actually happening/necessary, trade-offs,
etc.
thanks,
Alex Norman
Hi all,
I had to familiarize myself with python for work, and I took it as an
opportunity to hack on something I've want for some time now. I have
these behringer control surfaces, and they are pretty cool, but there is
no editor for them on linux. And using the device interface itself is a
l
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:09:33 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> I'm a bit unhappy that it makes code longer and more messy though. The
> primary design goal here is to make host code as terse and simple as
> possible. strcmp'ing a string and then freeing it is quite a bit uglier
> than just testi
