Re: [linux-audio-dev] FYI: GUADEC 2006 Sound BOF

On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 16:48 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 12:00 +0200, Jan Weil wrote: > > Apparently, a Sound BOF took place at GUADEC 2006 > > . Slides that were presented: > > > > > > It

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Language fanboys [was Re: light C++ set for WAV]

On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 12:32 -0700, Thomas Vecchione wrote: > > If your thinking of using a UDPish protocol, please use OSC. > > Was definitely considering it. I suppose my question there might be, > while I don't have intentions for it currently, I don't want to rule out > the possibility of th

Re: [linux-audio-dev] FYI: GUADEC 2006 Sound BOF

> If Apple can design a single sound system that's usable for desktop > toys AND pro audio why can't we? sigh :) . Cheers, ce

Re: [linux-audio-dev] FYI: GUADEC 2006 Sound BOF

> Great. One of the bullet points on the "Future directions" slide is > "Professional audio?". So it was not designed for professional use from > the ground up. > > If Apple can design a single sound system that's usable for desktop toys > AND pro audio why can't we? kde4 will be using 'phonon'

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Language fanboys [was Re: light C++ set for WAV]

Hallo, Thomas Vecchione hat gesagt: // Thomas Vecchione wrote: > my PDA). But yes OSC is definitely looking like a good possibility. Of > course I haven't looked to see if there is an OSC lib for my PDA much > less most PDAs;) liblo runs on PDAs. Check out the asciimatrix by Martin Rumori and

Re: [linux-audio-dev] FYI: GUADEC 2006 Sound BOF

On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 12:00 +0200, Jan Weil wrote: > Apparently, a Sound BOF took place at GUADEC 2006 > . Slides that were presented: > > > It seems that PulseAudio , formerly known as

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Language fanboys [was Re: light C++ set for WAV]

What is important however is that the latency is constant, jitter is quite obvious. Makes sense, how often is jitter in that regards a problem and if it is a decent amount of time, what might be done to help with that problem? MIDI latency is typically 1ms or so, and that's generally not a

[linux-audio-dev] [ANN] New specimen list and home

Hello all, I've set up a mailing list for specimen: http://zhevny.com/mailman/listinfo/specimen Additionally the web site now lives at http://zhevny.com/specimen. This is a minimal re-working of Pete's old site. More improvements to follow. Let me know if anything is badly broken. (I know the gu

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [OT] Language fanboys [was Re: light C++ set for WAV]

Stephen Sinclair wrote: Does anyone know any interesting and powerful languages that can be used just like C? That can link to C libraries, and can be compiled to native machine code, and can express the same low-level concepts as C, but in a more powerful and intuitive way? In short, does anyone

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Language fanboys [was Re: light C++ set for WAV]

On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:51:05 -0700, Thomas Vecchione wrote: > > > >??? Non realtime style? How can you have a gui written in a real time > >style? Doesn't that kind of break the basic rules of realtime? > > Well that is my question, sorry I should have clarified I am just now > getting into

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Language fanboys [was Re: light C++ set for WAV]

On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 01:13:43 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jul, 2006 at 09:39AM +1000, Loki Davison spake thus: > > On 7/21/06, Stephen Sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > > For music/audio stuff you can do the dsp stuff with c and then > > communicate with another proces