Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of
> commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't
> the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either.
I should also thank Ben Loftis of GWL (Harrison consoles)
for hooki
Anyway, I gave a fast look at the include/zzub/plugin.h file and it
seems me like it's a valid example of a plugin system which could be
implemented on the top of an architecture such as the one I'm
describing right here. (You were meaning this, right?)
Regards,
Stefano
Paul Davis wrote:
> congrats Erik.
Thanks!
> as you said, not the best (r8brain ?)
r8brains was good as was iZotope, Wavelab/Crystal and a couple of
others.
> but compared to the
> stuff in some proprietary DAWs, pretty great. quite amazing how bad the
> ProTools and Sadie systems were ...
Pr
2007/1/22, Dmitry Baikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 1/23/07, Stefano D'Angelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good point! This is true, but there are lots of sound processing
> plugins around, so maybe instead of creating a new API and then apply
> some "compatibility layer", it should be better to cre
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 08:53 +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of
> commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't
> the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either.
congrats Erik. as you said, not t
Hi all,
SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of
commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't
the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either.
The results are here:
http://src.infinitewave.ca/
This test gives me yet more incentive to continue
On 1/23/07, Stefano D'Angelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good point! This is true, but there are lots of sound processing
plugins around, so maybe instead of creating a new API and then apply
some "compatibility layer", it should be better to create a wrapping
tool natively. I think it should be a
2007/1/22, Leonard Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
might libzzub be part of what you are searching for?
http://trac.zeitherrschaft.org/zzub
Well, what do you mean for "extensible DSP plugin system"?
Let me know,
Stefano
2007/1/22, Dmitry Baikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 1/22/07, Stefano D'Angelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I'd like to work on is a sound processing architecture (LADSPA,
> VST, DSSI, etc.) wrapper, which hides the details of a particular
> implementation to audio program developers.
All this a
might libzzub be part of what you are searching for?
http://trac.zeitherrschaft.org/zzub
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 20:08 +0100, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm quite new to sound-related programming, but however I have an idea
> which could interest some of you, but I don't know if it's possi
On 1/22/07, Stefano D'Angelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I'd like to work on is a sound processing architecture (LADSPA,
VST, DSSI, etc.) wrapper, which hides the details of a particular
implementation to audio program developers.
All this architectures have different APIs.
Will your one hav
Hi all,
I'm quite new to sound-related programming, but however I have an idea
which could interest some of you, but I don't know if it's possible to
develop such thing.
What I'd like to work on is a sound processing architecture (LADSPA,
VST, DSSI, etc.) wrapper, which hides the details of a part
12 matches
Mail list logo
