[linux-audio-dev] ScoreChaser -- a new music notation editor

2007-01-23 Thread Michelle Donalies
I recently began work on a new music notation editor called ScoreChaser. A prototype release can be found at sourceforge.net/projects/scorechaser. Its intent is to be a program in the vein of Rosegarden (and indeed, it borrows quite heavily from RG, at least in these early versions), but with g

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] interview with Rui Nuno Capela

2007-01-23 Thread Rui Nuno Capela
Dave Phillips wrote: > Greetings: > > I've placed online an interview with Rui Capela, the creator of > QJackCtl, QSynth, QSampler, and QTractor. You can read it here: > >http://www.linuxjournal.com > > Enjoy! > Gee. Thanks Dave. Is not that usual one having his own name on a LJ article's

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sample Rate Converter Comparison

2007-01-23 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Denis Sbragion wrote: > Of course this is just academic, because I really doubt that the tiny > artifacts introduced by SRC are audible at all, even in its current > implementation. Just a matter of winning the race. :) The current algorithm (originally described by Julius O. Smith) has its limit

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sample Rate Converter Comparison

2007-01-23 Thread Denis Sbragion
Hello Erik, On Mon, January 22, 2007 22:53, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of > commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't > the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either. I once tried to further improve your

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sample Rate Converter Comparison

2007-01-23 Thread John Rigg
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 02:31:45PM +, John Rigg wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:53:13AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of > > commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't > > the best,

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sound processing objects architecture, is it possible?

2007-01-23 Thread Stefano D'Angelo
2007/1/23, Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 23 Jan 2007, at 16:14, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: > > Just some last questions and I'll stop shouting and fooling around :-) > > This issue should also have been faced with vstserver, fst and so, but > I never used them, so I'm just asking (I'm doing

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sound processing objects architecture, is it possible?

2007-01-23 Thread Steve Harris
On 23 Jan 2007, at 16:14, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: Just some last questions and I'll stop shouting and fooling around :-) This issue should also have been faced with vstserver, fst and so, but I never used them, so I'm just asking (I'm doing all of these because I'm working on a DSP program): h

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sound processing objects architecture, is it possible?

2007-01-23 Thread Stefano D'Angelo
2007/1/23, Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 23 Jan 2007, at 13:19, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: > 2007/1/23, Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> On 23 Jan 2007, at 12:17, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: >> >> >> >> You need to read the spec again. >> >> >> >> The terminology is confused, not least i

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sample Rate Converter Comparison

2007-01-23 Thread Dave Phillips
Steve Harris wrote: [snip] Works fine with my 2.0.0.1 too. I do all email and most Web surfing on my antique Omnibook running RH9, PlanetCCRMA, Mozilla 1.7.13. The graphics selector works fine here. And hey Erik, nice work ! :) Best, dp

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sample Rate Converter Comparison

2007-01-23 Thread Steve Harris
On 23 Jan 2007, at 14:43, Paul Davis wrote: On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:31 +, John Rigg wrote: On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:53:13AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Hi all, SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of commercially available sample rate converters and while

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sample Rate Converter Comparison

2007-01-23 Thread Bengt Gördén
tisdag 23 januari 2007 15:31 skrev John Rigg: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:53:13AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of > > commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't > > the best, it certainly d

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sample Rate Converter Comparison

2007-01-23 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:31 +, John Rigg wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:53:13AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of > > commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't > > the best, it cert

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sample Rate Converter Comparison

2007-01-23 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
=== On Tuesday 23 January 2007 17:31, John Rigg wrote: === > >Don't know if it's just me, but I can't get the images to change on >the web page (using Firefox 1.0.4 with javascript turned on). The only >way I can look at the results is to get the URLs for individual images >from the page so

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sound processing objects architecture, is it possible?

2007-01-23 Thread Steve Harris
On 23 Jan 2007, at 13:19, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: 2007/1/23, Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 23 Jan 2007, at 12:17, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: >> >> You need to read the spec again. >> >> The terminology is confused, not least in the spec documents, but a >> single .lv2 "plugin" can host

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sample Rate Converter Comparison

2007-01-23 Thread John Rigg
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:53:13AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Hi all, > > SecretRabbitCode was recently included in a test of a number of > commercially available sample rate converters and while it wasn't > the best, it certainly didn't disgrace itself either. > > The results are here:

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sound processing objects architecture, is it possible?

2007-01-23 Thread Stefano D'Angelo
2007/1/23, Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 23 Jan 2007, at 12:17, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: >> >> You need to read the spec again. >> >> The terminology is confused, not least in the spec documents, but a >> single .lv2 "plugin" can host multiple effects with different ports >> and so on. >>

[linux-audio-dev] interview with Rui Nuno Capela

2007-01-23 Thread Dave Phillips
Greetings: I've placed online an interview with Rui Capela, the creator of QJackCtl, QSynth, QSampler, and QTractor. You can read it here: http://www.linuxjournal.com Enjoy! Best, dp

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sound processing objects architecture, is it possible?

2007-01-23 Thread Steve Harris
On 23 Jan 2007, at 12:17, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: You need to read the spec again. The terminology is confused, not least in the spec documents, but a single .lv2 "plugin" can host multiple effects with different ports and so on. - Steve Oops... seems like I'm a bit confused! Well, I'm goi

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sound processing objects architecture, is it possible?

2007-01-23 Thread Stefano D'Angelo
2007/1/23, Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 22 Jan 2007, at 22:15, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: > 2007/1/22, Dmitry Baikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On 1/23/07, Stefano D'Angelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Good point! This is true, but there are lots of sound processing >> > plugins around, so

[linux-audio-dev] Little advertisment ;P

2007-01-23 Thread kind king knight
I am an electronic musician (even an computer musician). I am specializen in any kind of electronic music from techno to glitch .Here are some of my releases: www.ccmixter.org/media/people/game_core I am also a regular participator of soundevotion (www.sdcompo.com)tracking competition (as crosfi

[linux-audio-dev] Back in the land of the connected

2007-01-23 Thread Steve Harris
Just a quick heads-up. As some of you may know, I recently left my old job and the University of Southampton. But, I forgot to fill in the paperwork to keep my old accounts, machines etc. Consequently my @ecs.soton.ac.uk and @plugin.org.uk addresses stopped working, and the server that wa

Fwd: [linux-audio-dev] Sound processing objects architecture, is it possible?

2007-01-23 Thread Steve Harris
On 22 Jan 2007, at 22:15, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: 2007/1/22, Dmitry Baikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 1/23/07, Stefano D'Angelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good point! This is true, but there are lots of sound processing > plugins around, so maybe instead of creating a new API and then apply >