Hi all,
I am trying to record audio from my STM webcam the driver for it's sound card's
driver is loaded automatically as snd-usb-audio.
But When I try to record through sound recorder, it did't record anything.
On seeing at the catc traces I came to know that the sound recorder even don't
set th
Hi Steve,
> Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run()
> anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the host should chop the
> run() block where port values change. In practice not all hosts do
> that, some just pick a suitably small block size, eg. 32 frames and
> qua
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 17:22 +, Steve Harris wrote:
> On 29 Jan 2007, at 16:51, Florian Schmidt wrote:
>
> > On Monday 29 January 2007 09:08, Steve Harris wrote:
> >
> >> Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run()
> >> anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the h
Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is Zynjacku specific to Zyn in any way, or is it just named that way because
> you wanted an LV2 host when you happened to be working on Zyn-based plugins?
It is not specific. I loaded and produced sound with some of LV2 plugins
From ll-plugins and with
On 29 Jan 2007, at 17:57, Florian Schmidt wrote:
On Monday 29 January 2007 18:22, Steve Harris wrote:
http://tapas.affenbande.org/lv2/ext/fixed-buffersize
http://tapas.affenbande.org/lv2/ext/power-of-two-buffersize
Great idea. I've got some plugins that will benefit a lot by this. We
sh
On Monday 29 January 2007 18:22, Steve Harris wrote:
> > http://tapas.affenbande.org/lv2/ext/fixed-buffersize
> > http://tapas.affenbande.org/lv2/ext/power-of-two-buffersize
> Great idea. I've got some plugins that will benefit a lot by this. We
> should link to known extensions on the http://lv
On 29 Jan 2007, at 16:51, Florian Schmidt wrote:
On Monday 29 January 2007 09:08, Steve Harris wrote:
Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run()
anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the host should chop the
run() block where port values change. In practice no
On Monday 29 January 2007 09:08, Steve Harris wrote:
> Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run()
> anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the host should chop the
> run() block where port values change. In practice not all hosts do
> that, some just pick a suitably
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 10:23 -0500, Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:08:37AM +, Steve Harris wrote:
> > Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run()
> > anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the host should chop the
> > run() block where port v
On 29 Jan 2007, at 15:23, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:08:37AM +, Steve Harris wrote:
Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run()
anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the host should chop the
run() block where port values change.
/delurk
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:08:37AM +, Steve Harris wrote:
> Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run()
> anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the host should chop the
> run() block where port values change.
/delurk
What does "chop the run block" mean?
/
On 29 Jan 2007, at 14:41, Lars Luthman wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:49 +, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Monday 29 Jan 2007 07:39, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What are they? Do they do anything else, besides host LV2 plugins?
I'm aware of these LV2 hosts:
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:49 +, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Monday 29 Jan 2007 07:39, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
> > Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > What are they? Do they do anything else, besides host LV2 plugins?
> >
> > I'm aware of these LV2 hosts:
> > * jack_host from libslv2 proj
On Monday 29 Jan 2007 07:39, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
> Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What are they? Do they do anything else, besides host LV2 plugins?
>
> I'm aware of these LV2 hosts:
> * jack_host from libslv2 project, by Dave Robillard
> * elven from ll-plugins project, by Lars
On 29 Jan 2007, at 02:18, Fraser wrote:
Hi Steve,
Hi Fraser,
Sure. This was an issue in LADSPA, though not a significant enough
one that anyone wanted it changed. I would suspect you're
overestimating the burden compared to the function call overhead and
cache thrashing. I'd be interested t
15 matches
Mail list logo