Re: [linux-audio-dev] processing plugin standard wrapper

2007-02-16 Thread Stefano D'Angelo
2007/2/17, Stefano D'Angelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 2007/2/17, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >>> Ok, i get the context now. As you say, I'am both teacher and researcher, > >>> but my field is Software Engineering and my knowledge on theoretical DSP > >>> is not that mature, so don't take

Re: [linux-audio-dev] processing plugin standard wrapper

2007-02-16 Thread Stefano D'Angelo
2007/2/17, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Ok, i get the context now. As you say, I'am both teacher and researcher, >>> but my field is Software Engineering and my knowledge on theoretical DSP >>> is not that mature, so don't take my DSP related statements so serious. >>> To my level o

Re: [linux-audio-dev] processing plugin standard wrapper

2007-02-16 Thread Camilo Polyméris
Ok, i get the context now. As you say, I'am both teacher and researcher, but my field is Software Engineering and my knowledge on theoretical DSP is not that mature, so don't take my DSP related statements so serious. To my level of knowledge, i could say that most of the plugins are not just LT

[linux-audio-dev] [ANN] Mammut V0.57

2007-02-16 Thread Kjetil S. Matheussen
Homepage: http://www.notam02.no/arkiv/doc/mammut/ Screenshot: http://www.notam02.no/arkiv/doc/mammut/mammut.png Changes 0.22 -> 0.57 - -Ported from gtk1 to juce. -Various bells and whistles -Binaries for windows and mac -Various other things

Re: [linux-audio-dev] processing plugin standard wrapper

2007-02-16 Thread Stefano D'Angelo
2007/2/16, Loki Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 2/15/07, Stefano D'Angelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/2/14, Xavier Amatriain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hard to jump in the thread at this point, but let me try... > > > > I agree that the plugin approach is severely flawed in many senses > > (i