Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: processing plugin standard wrapper

2007-02-19 Thread Stefano D'Angelo
2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Jeff McClintock wrote: > >>>I actually don't know how many plugins are LTI, but, for example, a > >>>lot of delays, reverbs, choruses, eq. filters, compressors, modulators > >>>and "sound mixers" should be, and that's quite enough after all. > > Ye

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: processing plugin standard wrapper

2007-02-19 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 14:18 +0100, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: > > How often are more than one plugin with the same control inputs used in > > paralel? I was rather thinking of colapsing (or swapping) plugins in > > series. They'd have to be linear and time invariant, of course. > > Or maybe plugins c

[linux-audio-dev] Hunt for old list archives.

2007-02-19 Thread Marc-Olivier Barre
Hi all, As discussed previously on this list, we are getting ready for a migration of the three LA* lists to linuxaudio.org. Many things are done to make our list better. One of them concerns archives. As you may have noted, LA* archives found on music.columbia.edu date back to 2002. Ico told me

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: processing plugin standard wrapper

2007-02-19 Thread Camilo Polyméris
Stefano D'Angelo wrote: 2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Jeff McClintock wrote: > >>>I actually don't know how many plugins are LTI, but, for example, a > >>>lot of delays, reverbs, choruses, eq. filters, compressors, modulators > >>>and "sound mixers" should be, and that's qui

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: processing plugin standard wrapper

2007-02-19 Thread Stefano D'Angelo
2007/2/19, Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 14:18 +0100, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: > > How often are more than one plugin with the same control inputs used in > > paralel? I was rather thinking of colapsing (or swapping) plugins in > > series. They'd have to be linear and time

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: processing plugin standard wrapper

2007-02-19 Thread Stefano D'Angelo
2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Stefano D'Angelo wrote: > 2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Jeff McClintock wrote: >> > >>>I actually don't know how many plugins are LTI, but, for example, a >> > >>>lot of delays, reverbs, choruses, eq. filters, compressors, >>

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: processing plugin standard wrapper

2007-02-19 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 18:10 +0100, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: > > nope. thats not a linear arrangement of the two mono plugins, but a > > parallel arrangement. the signal going to each instance of the mono > > plugin is different. > > I'm obscure even in Italian, I can just imagine how it can sound

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: processing plugin standard wrapper

2007-02-19 Thread Camilo Polyméris
Stefano D'Angelo wrote: 2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Stefano D'Angelo wrote: > 2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Jeff McClintock wrote: >> > >>>I actually don't know how many plugins are LTI, but, for example, a >> > >>>lot of delays, reverbs, choruses, eq

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: processing plugin standard wrapper

2007-02-19 Thread Stefano D'Angelo
2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Stefano D'Angelo wrote: > 2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Stefano D'Angelo wrote: >> > 2007/2/19, Camilo Polyméris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Jeff McClintock wrote: >> >> > >>>I actually don't know how many plugins are LTI, but,

[linux-audio-dev] What does it mean for jack to be "rolling" (newby)

2007-02-19 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
I've been using jack and qjackctl with audacity under Linux (FC6). It seems to be working OK with 1 approx 1 msec xrun in a half hour recording session, when unfortunately my backup system kicked in. However there's something I don't understand about jack, even after reading a lot of the documen

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What does it mean for jack to be "rolling" (newby)

2007-02-19 Thread vreuzon
Jonathan Ryshpan a écrit : The above recording session was done while jack was "Stopped". Would jack work better if it were "Rolling"? This "play" button refers to jack "transport" functions : The JACK Audio Connection Kit provides simple transport interfaces for starting, stopping and repo

[linux-audio-dev] [completely OT] c++ and UTF-8 question

2007-02-19 Thread Julien Claassen
Hi! I'm sorry to ask that here, but it seems I can't get an anser anywhere else. Does the libstdc++ support UTF-8 strings? Or is there some simple example code snippet somewhere to derive/modify something which would fullfill this need? Kindest regards and thanks! Julien ---

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What does it mean for jack to be "rolling" (newby)

2007-02-19 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 13:18 -0800, vreuzon wrote: > Jonathan Ryshpan a écrit : > > The above recording session was done while jack was "Stopped". Would > > jack work better if it were "Rolling"? > > This "play" button refers to jack "transport" functions : > > > The JACK Audio Connection Kit pro

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What does it mean for jack to be "rolling" (newby)

2007-02-19 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 13:33 -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 13:18 -0800, vreuzon wrote: > > Jonathan Ryshpan a écrit : > > > The above recording session was done while jack was "Stopped". Would > > > jack work better if it were "Rolling"? > > > > This "play" button refers t

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What does it mean for jack to be "rolling" (newby)

2007-02-19 Thread Robin Gareus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 13:18 -0800, vreuzon wrote: >> Jonathan Ryshpan a �crit : >>> The above recording session was done while jack was "Stopped". Would >>> jack work better if it were "Rolling"? >> This "play" button refer

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [completely OT] c++ and UTF-8 question

2007-02-19 Thread Camilo Polyméris
Julien Claassen wrote: Hi! I'm sorry to ask that here, but it seems I can't get an anser anywhere else. Does the libstdc++ support UTF-8 strings? Or is there some simple example code snippet somewhere to derive/modify something which would fullfill this need? Kindest regards and thanks!

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [completely OT] c++ and UTF-8 question

2007-02-19 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 19:49 -0300, Camilo Polyméris wrote: > Julien Claassen wrote: > > Hi! > > I'm sorry to ask that here, but it seems I can't get an anser anywhere > > else. > > Does the libstdc++ support UTF-8 strings? Or is there some simple example > > code snippet somewhere to derive/m

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [completely OT] c++ and UTF-8 question

2007-02-19 Thread Julien Claassen
Thanks both of you! I think I'll have a go at the char_traits anyway, for I don't want to be dependent on even more external libraries. I know that Glib is not a graphics library, but it still draws attention by being not present with a lot of console users. At least the development packages.