On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:10:57PM +0200, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Are there any software which can generate Configure.in/Makefile.in etc.
> files automatically? I tried the auto* programs but I got nothing which
> could ever compile. I could not understand what was missing in config
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 07:37:59PM +, Steve Harris wrote:
> I've been using the intel C compiler for a few months now, but I was
> unable to comment on it quantatively before due to licensing restrictions.
Check out Codeplay's VectorC[1]: (go to the VectorC page):
VectorC recognises par
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 03:08:39PM +0100, Maarten de Boer wrote:
> Sounds very good. I can provide server space to host the test results,
> and write some CGI to display them.
The current scripts I'm using are pretty similar to Benno's
scripts in his latencytest package -- i.e. they output raw H
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:14:28AM +0100, Maarten de Boer wrote:
> > CONFIG_MK7=y
> >
> > Did I read correctly that some 3DNow instructions cause latency issues?
>
> That's what Roger Larsson suggested when I showed bad latency results.
> Compiling for 586 solved that problem for me, and I find
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:26:23AM +0100, Maarten de Boer wrote:
> I am thinking of setting up a webpage, where people can post
> their latencytest results, so we can keep an inventory of
> the several combinations, categorising on:
This is a great idea. I actually started re-writing the latenc
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 07:14:29PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> >with ALSA's snd-pcm-oss emulation module. If you get good results
> >with that, it'll be the ALSA library or the ALSA functions in the
> >latencytest programs which are screwing up, not your system.
>
> latencytest+ALSA on my machin
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 06:09:50PM +0100, Maarten de Boer wrote:
> Hi, I wrote this before, but I did not get any response.
>
> When I compile my kernel for i386 on an AMD Athlon, the
> alsa latency test is giving me weird distortion (knispering
> sound, like a dusty vinyl record)
> $ arecord -
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 06:34:17PM -0500, Fred Gleason wrote:
> I've been dealing with an interesting situation here regarding a system
> that is running three software RAID arrays. The layout consists of two
> RAID1 arrays sharing two IDE drives and a RAID5 array running on five SCSI
> drives (
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 01:40:54PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> Thus, the JACK server will be GPL, along with the ALSA
> driver module. But the "library" will be LGPL. this way,
> non-free programs can use the library, but the server and
> driver(s) cannot be co-opted in the same way.
Are you goin
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 03:41:47PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >The question becomes, why? Latency is important when receiving audio
> >processin g it, and resending it somewhere else. It is also important
> >when composing on th e computer. But playing back mp3s? What does
> >having 2 ms buffers
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 02:33:09PM -0500, dave willis wrote:
> where can i get the preemptive kernel patch? i've tried searches but get
> everything but...
http://www.tech9.net/rml/linux/
--
#ozone/algorithm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - trust.in.love.to.save
On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 03:51:39PM +0900, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> Is anyone going to shoot me if I advertise the best best case latency?
> Should I put a banner on the LAU-guide that says you can get 0.75 msec
> Full duplex latency or should I tell the truth that we can only get 2.6
> msec laten
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 08:09:53AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >On Karl's paper of latency measurements there was mentioned that the low-
> >latency patches have actually little effect and the reasone for bad latency on
> >some systems is actually IDE. Could you actually tell as more about this,
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 03:19:35PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> I'm a bit worried about it because Debian 2.2 rev 2 is behaving similarly.
> If I copy large files, or perform md5sums on large files, it may take even
> 45 seconds before I get the password prompt on the console or get
> a direc
14 matches
Mail list logo
