Re: [linux-audio-dev] OT Now I've seen everything (Audiophile related)

2002-06-04 Thread David Matthews
Now that's just ridiculous. I love tubes as much as anyone, but what's the point of using a tube amplifier with a cheapo motherboard DAC? -dgm --On Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:04 AM -0400 Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:r > http://www.aopen.com/products/mb/ax4b-533Tube.htm

Re: [linux-audio-dev] OSS query supported format

2002-05-13 Thread David Matthews
I have a feeling that the reason you haven't gotten much help on this list is that most of the people on this list develop for ALSA and/or JACK, rather than OSS. You might want to consider trying alsa or jack out, since OSS is being moved out of the kernel ayway. -dgm (who doesn't want to star

Re: [linux-audio-dev] SuperClonider

2002-04-22 Thread David Matthews
> This is not really surprising, as OSX is pretty much NeXTStep, and they > were releasing a version of NeXTStep for Intel Machines many years ago. > I don't think that Steve Jobs is that short-sighted that he would ignore > the Intel-platform for too long. How long can Apple continue to sell > th

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LCP v0.1.0

2001-12-10 Thread David Matthews
Are there any JACK-aware apps at this point, even experimentally? -dgm --On Monday, December 10, 2001 8:59 AM -0500 Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:r > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write: >> Could someone explain in simple english how these apps are intended to >> work together please?

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Gibson develops audio over ethernet protocol

2001-12-05 Thread David Matthews
--On Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:08 PM -0800 Dan Hollis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:r> > My only concern is if it is patent encumbered or not. The PDF doesn't make > that clear. > > -Dan It would be easy enough to ask. They've got an email address for potential developers and a reference bo