Re: [linux-audio-dev] 2.6.15.7-rt

2006-08-15 Thread Florian Paul Schmidt
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:07:04 +0200 Dominique Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From http://www.jacklab.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=103 : Model 1: Want to start a synth from time to time SUSE Standard kernel with PAM from Rui (also available in the jacklab repository) Model 2 Want to work

Re: [linux-audio-dev] 2.6.15.7-rt

2006-08-15 Thread Florian Paul Schmidt
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:02:25 +0200 Florian Paul Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given that you have setup rlimtis and rt lsm in equivalent ways, there must be no measurable difference in achievable latencies. If you do measure differences, some other factor of your setup differs, too. Let me

Re: [linux-audio-dev] 2.6.15.7-rt

2006-08-13 Thread Florian Paul Schmidt
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:46:35 +0200 Dominique Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A rt kernel will be of almost no use if you don't fix the priorities. You can use PAM-rlimits or the realtime-lsm module for that, and you have to be in the audio group. The audio group will have a higher priority

Re: [linux-audio-dev] light C++ set for WAV

2006-07-26 Thread Florian Paul Schmidt
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:07:13 +1000 Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My own rather feeble first attempt is here: http://www.mega-nerd.com/tmp/sndfile.hh but I am not a fan nor a great user of C++. The wrapper should really be written by someone with a love for the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] light C++ set for WAV

2006-07-26 Thread Florian Paul Schmidt
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:26:00 +0100 Chris Cannam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: vote++, i never cared for the more java style methodName convention. I think if your class is named LikeThis, then your method should be named likeThat (Java-style). If your method is named like_this, then your

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Set rate return zero

2006-07-09 Thread Florian Paul Schmidt
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 14:03:50 +0200 Jens M Andreasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 12:06 +0700, Huu Phuoc wrote: Hi everybody! I am a newbie to alsa programming. I am trying to follow the article which locates at http://www.suse.de/~mana/alsa090_howto.html to develop a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] Aqualung 0.9beta5 released

2006-07-03 Thread Florian Paul Schmidt
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:33:11 +0200 Alfons Adriaensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:53:01AM +0200, Tom Szilagyi wrote: Aqualung: Music Player for GNU/Linux Release 0.9beta5 This looked like the player I've been wanting for some

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] [ANN] Aqualung 0.9beta5 released

2006-06-30 Thread Florian Paul Schmidt
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:53:01 +0200 Tom Szilagyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aqualung: Music Player for GNU/Linux http://aqualung.sf.net Release 0.9beta5 Damn you beat us to it. See these two mailing list posts:

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] GLASHCtl 0.2

2006-06-13 Thread Florian Paul Schmidt
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:11:05 +0200 Lars Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You should maybe add that this will only work when jack is already started or JACK_START_SERVER is set in the environment. Hm, true. I never even considered that option. Is anyone still starting jackd manually? Yah,

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] GLASHCtl 0.2

2006-06-12 Thread Florian Paul Schmidt
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:56:09 +0200 Lars Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To use the applet, simply run the program. If you have a standards-compliant system tray on your desktop a small LASH icon (a cardboard box with a soundwave on it) should appear there. It is probably insensitive (greyed

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] Sonic Visualiser: An application for audio visualisation and analysis

2006-05-19 Thread Florian Paul Schmidt
On Fri, 19 May 2006 15:27:15 +0100 Chris Cannam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Announcing Sonic Visualiser, an application for viewing and analysing the contents of music audio files. http://www.sonicvisualiser.org/ Way cool :) Flo -- Palimm Palimm! http://tapas.affenbande.org

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

2006-04-26 Thread Florian Paul Schmidt
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:55:55 -0400 Paul Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it takes *way* more lines of code than that to use a ladspa plugin in this way, and thats for the existing header-only specification. one the design goals of a good plugin API is to make life simple for plugins, because