On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 09:06:06PM +, Steve Harris wrote:
>
> Thge UI is 2D (you turn off perspective before you draw), its just a
> way of loading all the images and stuff onto the card, and making it
> do the drawing maths. It saves a /lot/ of cpu. Its more-or-less how
> the latest OSX GUI c
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 01:32:42AM +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>
> Very often you must supply parameters that are not relevant to your
> specific call,
And on the other hand, in Win16/Win32, you have to send along the
window size to every process ...
Jesper
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 12:57:42PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> >
> > Posix has no "thinking" regarding WIMPs
>
> Remind me what WIMPs stands for, so I can understand this comment.
Window Icon MousePointer; just about synonymous with GUI.
Jesper
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:13:48PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:49:24AM +0100, Jesper Anderson wrote:
> > GTK has been like that for years now. Check the archives of SLASH'EM,
> > a Nethack clone, for lots of back and forth. In short, they'r
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:38:55AM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:12:50PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> > If you accept my arguments why this is not the right solution,
> > then the question remains, what to do about GTK-2? I don't
> > suppose the GTK developers are likely to
