Hi there,
Waldorf from Germany has made an analog VCF which
could be connected via USB to a computer system:
http://www.waldorf-music.com/afb/
Regards,
Joachim Backhaus
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 19. März 2003 14:52
>
> I´m not a programmer, but If I were, I´d try to do some
> co-operation with
> fruity-developers and do an linux-support to the fruityloops.
> ´cause it´s
> only the question of time&money.
I don't think that they like to share the code with a developer
and why should anyone port Fruity Loops
> "I wish to know that my work will be used to praise the name of Jesus."
Are you serious about that?
Is that part of the license?
Regards,
Joachim
> Hi, I wrote a software syntesizer for Linux, it is
> available at http://zynaddsubfx.sourceforge.net/ or
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/z
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik de Castro Lopo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 3. Juli 2002 20:31
>
> The main problem I see is that the extra features of KDE and
> GNOME chew up
> CPU grunt and RAM that would be better spent doing audio.
What's with XFCE?
http://www.x
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivien Guillet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Freitag, 24. Mai 2002 12:46
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Acid-like player using ladspa plugin
>
>
> Do you think it's possible ? And what about using it in an audio
> sequencer ?
Why
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael J McGonagle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2002 16:43
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] The intel C compiler
>
>
> Steve Harris wrote:
> >
> > I've been using the intel C compiler for a few months no
it and build, but the
> compiler is
> *very* hard to get working if you aren't using redhat 6.2 or 7.[12].
What are you using? I'm using Mandrake 8.1 but I haven't tried the
Intel C Compiler yet.
Regards,
Joachim Backhaus
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 16:42
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's
>
>
> >why do so much different Plug In API's exist
> >(it seems that every application has it's
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Wingo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 16:25
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's
>
>
> An interesting question, to be sure.
> http://jackit.sf.net/faq/ compares
> a lot of plu
> -Original Message-
> From: Joachim Backhaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 15:39
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's
>
> But LADSPA seems to be the online one of them
Hi,
why do so much different Plug In API's exist
(it seems that every application has it's own API)?
Wouldn't it be much more efficient to bundle
the power to one superb API?
E.g. I have found LADSPA, MAIA and OX_API.
But LADSPA seems to be the online one of them
which is further developed.
Hi,
I'm living in germany / europe does that mean
that I can ignore the US patents since we
have a different patent system???
(I think it's not going that way)
Fuck software patents.
Regards
Joachim
PS: But if no one knows that I use patented technology ... ;)
Perhaps we can provide patented
Hi,
I'm also subscribed to some synth-diy lists
which are maybe of interest for things like
building a MIDI Interface.
The first is specialised in synth-diy projects
made with DSP's:
http://shoko.calarts.edu/~glmrboy/musicdsp/music-dsp.html
And the other is more for analog stuff:
http://www.
> -Original Message-
> From: nixx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Freitag, 11. Januar 2002 16:56
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Creamware Pulsar
>
>
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:33:07 +0100
> Joachim Backhaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED
d mac os software instead of developing something
for an OS that almost nobody uses in their target market.
It's like a viciuous circle.
Regards
Joachim Backhaus
I found out that Midiman has also a 8 x 8 MIDI Interface with USB,
so if there is a driver planned for this, I'll sell the
Steinberg Midex 8 I have.
Thanx
Joachim Backhaus
> So it seems that Midiman is as linux friendly as
> thought.
I meant "So it seems that Midiman is NOT as linux friendly
as thought.".
s as linux friendly as
thought.
Regards
Joachim Backhaus
> -Original Message-
> From: Technischer Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2002 13:45
> To: Joachim Backhaus
> Subject: Re: Linux Treiber für Winman 2 x 2 und Portman 2 x 4
>
>
> Hal
> -Original Message-
> From: DAVID G MATTHEWS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Dienstag, 8. Januar 2002 19:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Another stupid question: Linux & MIDI
> Interfaces
>
> I don't know about their Midi interfaces, but Midiman/M-Audio ha
> -Original Message-
> From: jfm3 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Dienstag, 8. Januar 2002 16:23
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Another stupid question: Linux & MIDI
> Interfaces
>
>
> "external" MIDI inteface for Linux/ix86?
> Midiator is the way:
> MS-124
audio hardware
(and that I have to write the linux drivers by myself).
I'm sorry if this question is stupid.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Joachim Backhaus
Hi there,
I don't if this is an old issue but
what is the fastest desktop environment for
linux audio?
I think KDE and gnome are too overpowered.
Has anyone made or knows of benchmarks results
especially for the audio sector?
Thanx in advance
Joachim Backhaus
Trying to reverse engineer seems to become a life-task,
it's perhaps really better to buy a second professional card that
has Linux support. Maybe the M-Audio Delta 44.
But which card with additional dsp's for effect
processing has Linux support?
23 matches
Mail list logo
