Re: [linux-audio-dev] newest audio server for Linux (yep, yetanother)

2003-02-05 Thread Josh Haberman
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 06:39, Fred Gleason wrote: > On Tuesday 04 February 2003 21:03, David Olofson wrote: > > > OTOH, I'll need a nice replacement for the ALSA sequencer, if the > > thing is to be usable for anything but music and SFX playback on > > other platforms. Currently, the most "portable

Re: [linux-audio-dev] newest audio server for Linux (yep, yetanother)

2003-02-04 Thread Josh Haberman
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 18:03, David Olofson wrote: > Would be cool if even more platforms were supported, but OTOH, in the > case of Audiality, that's mostly for games that use it as a sound > engine - and SDL works fine for that. What platforms are not supported that you would like to see? Ther

Re: [linux-audio-dev] newest audio server for Linux (yep, yetanother)

2003-02-04 Thread Josh Haberman
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 13:41, Bob Ham wrote: > On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 20:47, Josh Haberman wrote: > > > Imagine being able to write to an API as simple and well-designed as > > this: <http://www.portaudio.com/docs/v19-doxydocs/portaudio_8h.html> > > Just out o

Re: [linux-audio-dev] newest audio server for Linux (yep, yetanother)

2003-02-04 Thread Josh Haberman
ndex.html> I am interested to hear responses to this. Once PortAudio v19 is released, would you all as application authors be willing to adopt it in your programs? If so, why not? In my opinion, the only group of applications that would not benefit from using PortAudio are those that are s