Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ? - ALSA

2005-06-20 Thread Juan Linietsky
Takashi Iwai wrote: -Module configuration parameters. WHY ON EARTH do I have to specify the IO port for mpu401, joystick, etc as driver options when loading the modules for my soundcard, else doesnt work? What year are we on?! I cant believe that this resource allocation is not handled by ALSA

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ? - ALSA

2005-06-20 Thread Juan Linietsky
Paul Davis wrote: -Dmix. It's not fair, why not the windows/beos approach which uses primary/secondary buffers? so you can you know what? there is plenty about the design to complain about, but when i complain about it, i willingly admit my own complicity in the mistakes that were made. A

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-20 Thread Juan Linietsky
Paul Davis wrote: -Alsa/Jack integration in timestamping is poor, syncronizing audio to midi is a pain i suspect that you don't understand (or perhaps even know about) the DLL-driven jack_frame_time(). What is DLL-Driven? I used jack_frame_time() in chionic, It works, but it's not en

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-19 Thread Juan Linietsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I said many times It's not that I hate Linux Audio, but mainly that I mmh, i love it, believe that it is too poor in features/API for my taste. I tried very hard for several years to make my apps play together with jack/alsa, but I find myself very limite

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ? - ALSA

2005-06-19 Thread Juan Linietsky
ALSA related, I hate: -Dmix. It's not fair, why not the windows/beos approach which uses primary/secondary buffers? so you can AT THE SAME TIME access asyncronously to the audio device (Jack) and have lower priority audio mix when it can, by copying it from from some less-priority buffers too?

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-19 Thread Juan Linietsky
Dave Phillips wrote: Greetings: The subject says it all. My own "Linux audio sucks" hobbyhorse: No way to recall a complex configuration of apps and plugins with all settings intact. If I use a complicated setup with multiple synths and plugins I have no way to recall these application

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Chionic 1.0.0 Final (Sampler) Released!!

2005-04-09 Thread Juan Linietsky
Paul Davis wrote: I'm over with the development of chionic, on it's first release. I have to sadly accept that as much as it works the way I want, I cant communicate my sequencer to chionic in the way I need (because Jackd is too poor to do it the proper way). [... ] CHIONIC IS DEAD

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Creating the conditions for VST-like plugins on Linux.

2005-04-09 Thread Juan Linietsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:57:04PM -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote: Hi ! I'm writing this mail because at this point I'm seeing that the Linux Audio Development community is still going aimlessly on how to develop powerful audio applications. As we know, one

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Creating the conditions for VST-like plugins on Linux.

2005-04-09 Thread Juan Linietsky
Dave Robillard wrote: On Fri, 2005-08-04 at 14:57 -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote: The following are excuses: -Because we need core and interface separation, this way we warranty a clean design and network transparency -Because it would force both interface and core to be memory locked, as a

[linux-audio-dev] Chionic 1.0.0 Final (Sampler) Released!!

2005-04-09 Thread Juan Linietsky
I have decided to put together a release and free Chionic to the world. Chionic is by far THE most advanced sampler that you can find for GNU/Linux, *BSD, Etc. It is not only extremely powerful, but t has everything configurable via UI. You can obtain the baby here: http://www.reduz.com.ar/chion

[linux-audio-dev] Creating the conditions for VST-like plugins on Linux.

2005-04-08 Thread Juan Linietsky
Hi ! I'm writing this mail because at this point I'm seeing that the Linux Audio Development community is still going aimlessly on how to develop powerful audio applications. As we know, one of the key factors missing nowadays is audio plugins and synth plugins. Some audio plugin needs can be

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Audio synchronization, MIDI API

2004-08-15 Thread Juan Linietsky
tency is fine, playing full complex midi pieces in realtime had a lot of jittering.. I did packet monitoring and it all seemed ok (all the network traffic was for midi).. I'm suspecting that it may be related to the network card or driver doing some sort of buffering.. but I cant really tell

Re: [linux-audio-dev] swh plugins and fixing undenormalize

2004-06-24 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Thursday 24 June 2004 06:21, Steve Harris wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 06:36:47 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:37:35 +0100 > > > > Simon Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > inline float FlushToZero( volatile float f ) > > > { > > >f += 9.8607615E-32f; >

Re: [linux-audio-dev] swh plugins and fixing undenormalize

2004-06-23 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Wednesday 23 June 2004 15:54, Steve Harris wrote: > http://plugin.org.uk/releases/0.4.4/ > > * Fixes to build on recent gcc > * New limiter for beter performance in JAMin > * Denomal fixes from Tim Blechmann (general and specifially the flanger) > * Many other things I've forgotten :( > > This r

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Spinboxes

2004-06-21 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Sunday 20 June 2004 13:16, Thorsten Wilms wrote: > Hi! > > The usual spinboxes with their tiny up/down arrow buttons > made me think about an alternative. > Since using more height than a textfield has would make > layout very troublesome, my solution is placing the > buttons horizontaly. > I p

Re: [linux-audio-dev] ANNOUNCE: cheesetracker 0.9.9 released

2004-04-28 Thread Juan Linietsky
ow, these questions can be solved by myself, too. But my > netbsd-machine is busy to fix a driver issue atm ;) ) > > > With best regards, > > > Sascha Retzki Cheers! Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] ANNOUNCE: cheesetracker 0.9.9 released

2004-04-25 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Saturday 24 April 2004 12:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 23 Apr, 2004 at 03:51AM -0300, Juan Linietsky spake thus: > > CheeseTracker is a mature,versatile and extremely full-featured > > application that works as an all-in-one sequencer/sampler/sample > > editor/fx

Re: [linux-audio-dev] ANNOUNCE: cheesetracker 0.9.9 released

2004-04-25 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Saturday 24 April 2004 09:39, Sascha Retzki wrote: > Am Fr, 2004-04-23 um 08.51 schrieb Juan Linietsky: > > CheeseTracker is a mature,versatile and extremely full-featured > > application that works as an all-in-one sequencer/sampler/sample > > editor/fx processor. It allow

[linux-audio-dev] ANNOUNCE: cheesetracker 0.9.9 released

2004-04-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
, but very tweakeable) -New effect! Stereo FX (kickass post-production helper) -New bugs! report them please! Enjoy! Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] MuSE 0.9 codename "COTURNIX" - out now with documented API!

2004-04-18 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Sunday 18 April 2004 08:19, jaromil wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > re all, > > i forward you here the announce as somebody could be interested also in > exploring the doxyfied MuSE API, which is getting pretty stable now. > > see http://muse.dyne.org/codedoc > > c

Re: [linux-audio-dev] IRQ rotation

2004-03-05 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Friday 05 March 2004 16:03, Tim Hockin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:30:58PM +, Steve Harris wrote: > > > This really mattered? I'm honestly DEEPLY surprised, and a bit > > > sceptical. IRQ priority will only matter AT ALL if you are in a > > > constant state of interrupt, or your IRQ

[linux-audio-dev] [request] Info on the Awe32 schematics

2004-03-01 Thread Juan Linietsky
Does any of you know how to get PROPER docummentation on the Sound Blaster AWE32? and If possible, official datasheets or something.. I think creative's official devkit is gone from the internet... And all I get is incomplete unofficial specs. here and there.. Do you guys also know if people fr

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Tracker

2003-11-28 Thread Juan Linietsky
just created a *third* possible install location. Oh, my apologies for misreading. I think the only sane thing about it is that -lets you keep track of what's in your system and where did it came from without an extra database of the package management system -lets you easily install/switch betwe

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Tracker

2003-11-28 Thread Juan Linietsky
in /usr, while the old one is in /usr/local. Result: new program doesnt work, as /usr/local has priority, and the user is confused. He probably just removed the sources as they were taking space and cant -or doesnt know- about make uninstall. as paul says, opt/ is a fine solution for this, as everything just symlinks, but it's sad that it never took off. Cheers Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] ANNOUNCE: Rosegarden-4-0.9.5 released

2003-11-28 Thread Juan Linietsky
I'll be glad to test it over the weekend and try to find as many bugs as I can... > New features since 0.9.1 include: Wasnt it 0.9.5 ? Cheers Juan Linietsky

[linux-audio-dev] Making a song with festival for voices:

2003-11-27 Thread Juan Linietsky
ts hope we get more festivalized songs soon :) Maybe Paul Davis will consider integrating festival to ardour hehe... Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Tracker

2003-11-26 Thread Juan Linietsky
that open source software doesnt die until maybe when it gets replaced by something better. So let those who would rather not use closed source software say "Thanks, but no thanks". Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Tracker

2003-11-26 Thread Juan Linietsky
re in many aspects), and it's opensource, only lacks the nice gui :) Juan Linietsky

[linux-audio-dev] Singing speech synthesis test with festival

2003-11-25 Thread Juan Linietsky
hen I wrote a very basic arrangement in cheesetracker, plus added some effects and a bit of compressor to the voice. The result is actually better than what I was expecting, though it's hard to keep festival in tempo. Here's the little thing I did: http://reduz.com.ar/songs/evilrobot.ogg

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Retro speech synthesis

2003-11-24 Thread Juan Linietsky
l though, it talks very strange... There is also a smaller/reduced version of festival you can try out, but i forgot how it is called. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] virtual vocalist - I think we could have something similar without much work...

2003-11-23 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Sunday 23 November 2003 09:07, Luke Yelavich wrote: > At 08:56 PM 24/11/2003, Juan Linietsky wrote: > >On Thursday 20 November 2003 01:09, Paul Davis wrote: > > > http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2003/Vocaloid.html > > > >You know, FESTIVAL (the popular an

Re: [linux-audio-dev] virtual vocalist - I think we could have something similar without much work...

2003-11-23 Thread Juan Linietsky
e a similar GUI where you edit a pianoroll to make festival sing. Seems like a very nice small project, anyone willing to take it? Juan Linietsky

[linux-audio-dev] CheeseTracker 0.9.0 released!

2003-10-29 Thread Juan Linietsky
-=-=-=- -Rock Solid stability -WAV exporting -A hopefully working Windows port. This depends mainly on the Qt-Win32 project. If you are a good Windows programmer and would like to see CheeseTracker working in there sooner, please give those guys a hand! Enjoy!! Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] new linux audio hardware company

2003-10-17 Thread Juan Linietsky
un vst under linux ... > I think i read recently about some program that emulates the host environment using wine libraries. The same way it is done in mplayer to use win32 codecs.. so you can use native VST plugins. Not a clue about where to find this. I myself would be happy to give it a try too! Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Fixed vs Floating point comparison.

2003-10-17 Thread Juan Linietsky
pipeline (And I think something else too but I coudlnt tell) until decoded. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Fixed vs Floating point comparison.

2003-10-16 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Friday 17 October 2003 01:20, Steve Harris wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:09:13 -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote: > > My own conclusions about the subject is that the float -> int conversion > > is STILL the biggest bottleneck on most common architectures. And until >

[linux-audio-dev] Fixed vs Floating point comparison.

2003-10-16 Thread Juan Linietsky
the source, you could replace "counter/ increment" for purely fixed point values, and do the rest (managing the samples) in float. This will undoubly speed it up.. Cheers! Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Athlon64 .. performance boost ?

2003-10-16 Thread Juan Linietsky
rom this new 64 bits architecture seems to me to be just more registers and larger adressing... Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] midi keyboard & alsa & timidiy suspend my whole system !!

2003-10-11 Thread Juan Linietsky
mplex, buggy and unstable application. Did you try fluidsynth instead? It may use a lot more cpu and have poor midi support compared to timidity, but it should work and load soundfonts pretty well. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladcca

2003-10-11 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Saturday 11 October 2003 13:50, Tim Orford wrote: > > Juan Linietsky > > hi > > by some no doubt fated coincidence i was just re-reading your > seminal email (!) which inspired ladcca and myself. Things look > a little quiet on the web site so i was wondering how yo

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Oss & threading -- is it possible

2003-10-11 Thread Juan Linietsky
SP and manages audio .. the main one is for the GUI. Intercomunication between both is done via shared memory, unless on destructive operations, where locking is performed. (lock on the gui, and trylock on the audio thread). This is to ensure that jack will not kill the app :) Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] The outline of Timidity

2003-09-10 Thread Juan Linietsky
is so messy that i dont think It's worth dealing with unless you have a lot of time.. I suppose the good side of it is that it works with fixed point math so it should run on PDAs? (unlike fluidsynth). I have mailed the mantainer several times and got no answer either. Cheers Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] GOODDAY

2003-09-10 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Monday 08 September 2003 21:38, SONNY LAYE & SISTER wrote: > Goodday, > > Please I am Master Sonny Laye, the only son of late > chief Joseph Alfred Laye from Hehe.. this one was actually amusing to read, they get more and more creative in each one. Lets hope this guy and his little sister f

Re: [linux-audio-dev] kernel 2.6

2003-07-25 Thread Juan Linietsky
inux to be usable for audio applications or embedded audio > devices it needs something like SCHED_FIFO. > It is a posix standard, so it is unlikely to go away :) Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Great (and some offtopic)

2003-07-17 Thread Juan Linietsky
apidly taken by musicans to call anything nature/ambient and out of the context of religion. Maybe the site should specify "Anti christian ritual music"? Well, cheers and thanks for such an awesome piece of work! Juan Linietsky Cheers! Juan Linietsky but musicans

Re: [linux-audio-dev] cheesetracker 0.8: unable to build

2003-07-08 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 17:44, nikodimka wrote: > Hello LADs! > > I am trying to build cheestracker 0.8.0 > on debian-stable, g++-2.95, with custom installed qt3 > and getting trouble. > > > here's how the make log looks like: > hi, I've never seen this, what does "moc -v" say? Juan Linietsky

[linux-audio-dev] It's been more than a year... Have things improved?

2003-07-06 Thread Juan Linietsky
s not my intention at all. I am very happy with the progress of the apps, and It's great to see apps like swami, rosegarden or ardour become mature with the time. Well, cheers to everyone and lets keep working hard! Juan Linietsky

[linux-audio-dev] CheeseTracker 0.8.0 is out

2003-06-23 Thread Juan Linietsky
! Juan Linietsky

[linux-audio-dev] [OT] Question about some definition..

2003-06-13 Thread Juan Linietsky
e me a brief on this? Thanks in advance! Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] I think that what he means is even more important than recognition...

2002-10-31 Thread Juan Linietsky
some draft here in the lad groups and invite other open groups to participate too (openal, beos advocates, etc). An open, cross platform plugin/routing api could sure give us a huge boost! Cheers Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Count me in! Linux definitively needs a good sampler!

2002-10-31 Thread Juan Linietsky
hestral CD compilations, or those kickass john williams guitar sample CDs, or those chorale sets, jazz ensembles, etc that you can find on inet. Cmon, let's join together and give GIGA and HALION a run for their money. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] interesting post from vst-plugins on float/int

2002-09-17 Thread Juan Linietsky
ace and memory usage are vital when you are writing a sampler, i'd hate it if my sample libs would take up twice as much. Also saturated adds in MMX are awesome when layering/mixing many code blocks. For now, I dont see any reason to switch to floating point for my stuff since facts show

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] midi events in jack callback / ALSA Sequencer

2002-08-20 Thread Juan Linietsky
> Perhaps you might want to look at the ALSA sequencer, and take it to > a higher level? I'd love to see UST time references... > I guess the question is more, how to obtain UST time (cool redundancy hehe:) references in linux? Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] midi events in jack callback / ALSA Sequencer

2002-08-20 Thread Juan Linietsky
micro scheduling ... > > Can softsynths request ahead-scheduling with the current Alsa > sequencer API? If so, how? Hi Peter.. no, they cant :( And they cant also because linux wont proovide any sort of unadjusted time. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [announcement] Legasynth 0.4.1 is out!, sorry forgot URL :)

2002-08-16 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 02:07:36 -0300 Juan Linietsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://reduz.com.ar/legasynth > Legasynth 0.4.1 is out. > Legasynth is a mature app, and it's ready for professional/studio > usage. It also features > a frinedly userinterface for managing all

[linux-audio-dev] [announcement] Legasynth 0.4.1 is out!

2002-08-16 Thread Juan Linietsky
emulation rocks now, give it a try! -Added controllers per machine -Misc BugFixes/CrashFixes (thanks node/Bob Ham for the help!) Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] midi events in jack callback (was: Reborn)

2002-08-16 Thread Juan Linietsky
ndcard. Well, personally I'd like to contribute to MIDI support for jack, i think would be great if it can handle midi, since it's already nice and consistent. How are you planning to do this? adding midi in/out ports besides the audio ones? I think if going that far, it would be nice at future, if it could also add some sort of control streams, such as start/stop/pause/set position,etc. Cheers. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] midi events in jack callback (was: Reborn)

2002-08-16 Thread Juan Linietsky
ically this alone may justify giving jack midi superpowers, since we know how important a good midi sync is. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What I think about reborn.

2002-08-15 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:00:22 -0500 Billy Biggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Reduz, > > Juan Linietsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > [...] Yes, the author is free to do whathever he wants, and he > > owns his work, but that doesnt mean we cant criticize his > >

[linux-audio-dev] What I think about reborn.

2002-08-15 Thread Juan Linietsky
he app and its interface, because i'd pee my pants. I'm not trying to be aggressive, so i'm sorry for using harsh language, I'm trying to formalize my feelings for the whole situation, and maybe what others feel too, and I hope David Singer thinks about this before releasing his next app, so the same stupid situation wont repeat. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Alas, reborn is no more?

2002-08-14 Thread Juan Linietsky
(I still don't get what went into his mind) > > Oh really? I didn't know that the interface was such a clear > knockoff. Maybe they had a valid complaint then. > > Taybin > Well, this teach us that not releasing the source, even for cleaning up reasons is dumb. Oh well. If the guy would have released the source, development could have continued. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Reborn

2002-08-12 Thread Juan Linietsky
that incorporate GPL'd code. I don't doubt the source will come, > but if there is free code in there, the man is flagrantly violating > the GPL at the moment. This is worrying. > Very serious.. I cant wait for the code so i can add it to legasynth ;) Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] App metadata intercomunication protocol..

2002-07-23 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 11:28:01 +0200 Vincent Touquet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 02:30:22AM -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote: > >ok, but the question is, what for? What else do you need other than > >start/stop/seek ? doesnt midi proovide that already?

Re: [linux-audio-dev] App metadata intercomunication protocol..

2002-07-23 Thread Juan Linietsky
e as using a piledriver when a hammer would do. > And also you cant do the neat thing of asking all your apps to save all their data to a directory so you can create a targzip with the project :) Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] App metadata intercomunication protocol..

2002-07-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
. > ok, but the question is, what for? What else do you need other than start/stop/seek ? doesnt midi proovide that already? then why something else? Also using midi you make sure that what you do is synced to external devices... Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] App intercomunication issues, some views.

2002-07-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
so I dont know how gnome works, i was thinking that this would need to be done using sockets (either unix or /tcp) I'll try to write a proposal for how i think it should work this week... Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] App intercomunication issues, some views.

2002-07-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
ry about doing a new project ;) I think just doing a new project will be cleaner. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] App intercomunication issues, some views.

2002-07-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
So what should this program/api be? "A project manager for IPC enabled apps". That's it. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] App metadata intercomunication protocol..

2002-07-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 00:39:54 +0200 Vincent Touquet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 07:17:27PM -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote: > (cut) > >How do you think the implementation should be? I cant think of > >much, but > >i think even a simple commun

Re: [linux-audio-dev] App intercomunication issues, some views.

2002-07-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:41:45 -0400 (EDT) Taybin Rutkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Juan Linietsky wrote: > > > But what about the overall status of the apps? not only the jack > > network.. > > the idea i was refering to is how to "

Re: [linux-audio-dev] App intercomunication issues, some views.

2002-07-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
needed more often than not. Well, that's exactly what ALSA Sequencer api proovides, midi transport between apps. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] App intercomunication issues, some views.

2002-07-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 23:55:37 +0200 Vincent Touquet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:44:00PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 05:18:46PM -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote: > >> I think this can be solved by developing a metadata proto

Re: [linux-audio-dev] App metadata intercomunication protocol..

2002-07-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 16:44:00 -0400 Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 05:18:46PM -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote: > > I think this can be solved by developing a metadata protocol > > between apps, so the can intercommunicate > > status and

Re: [linux-audio-dev] App intercomunication issues, some views.

2002-07-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
in a similar fashion follows on from > this. > Alsa Sequencer can already do this, it's called "Aseqnet" and it comes with alsa lib i think. Give it a try! I use it to run my awe64 on a k6-2 which has ISA slots :) Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] App intercomunication issues, some views.

2002-07-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 16:30:07 -0400 (EDT) Taybin Rutkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Juan Linietsky wrote: > > > So, what do you think about this issue? I'd really like to hear > > views on this since i guess it's probably > > th

[linux-audio-dev] App intercomunication issues, some views.

2002-07-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
t you will be able to save/load projects and go back to them in no time. A good thing about this is that it resembles more how studios work, with all their equipment interconnected, so in some way this should make easier to integrate external stuff to our "projects". So, what do you think about this issue? I'd really like to hear views on this since i guess it's probably the biggest problem the audio community is facing. Regards Juan Linietsky

[linux-audio-dev] [Announcement] LegaSynth is finally out!

2002-07-21 Thread Juan Linietsky
t want to contact me, you can use the mail below, or just join #lad (linux audio development) on irc.openprojects.net and find me by the handle "reduz". Regards! Juan Linietsky ah, thanks to Sébastien Métrot for proposing the app name :)

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Buffering idea

2002-06-18 Thread Juan Linietsky
I suppose shouldnt fear a lawsuit since I live in Argentina anyway.. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Poll about linux music audio app usability

2002-06-11 Thread Juan Linietsky
> the way it is implemented, there just isn't much to complain > > about. ;) > > Wow! That means alot to me to hear that, many thanks!! > I would have helped you with it if i had known about it before finsihing shaketracker, if that helps ;) btw, have you worked anymore on it? Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Poll about linux music audio app usability

2002-06-10 Thread Juan Linietsky
t the > basic sound, and then, if required, unscrew the chrome panels to > hack same more complex logic and/or math in. :-) > > Doesn't make things easier, does it? > Personally I'd rather move knobs than trying values. I write my apps usually in the userfriendly way becuse of this. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Audio routing issues for linux..

2002-06-10 Thread Juan Linietsky
ice) - when JACK delivers an interrupt, the bridge code updates the "hwptr" and checks whether ALSA app should be woken up - sw-params like avail_min, and start/stop threshold can be used to control to bridge operation - ... you get the picture - Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] Audio routing issues for linux..

2002-06-10 Thread Juan Linietsky
apturing back the audio without da/ad problems, sharing the output in consumer cards, and more. This also can make life easier for ALSA driver developers who can give less priority to supporting such features in the soundcard hardware, because users will be able to have them much sooner. > PS You can also think of this bridge as JACK embedded in alsa-lib >if that sounds nicer to you. >;) > > -- Sounds nice :) Juan Linietsky.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Audio routing issues for linux..

2002-06-10 Thread Juan Linietsky
vel or something?) so it can capture and automatically "jackify" the data from existing apps that use the native api (alsa/oss emulation). The stream doesnt need to go "low latency" (and from what I know JACK should support normal latency apps fine) but you can still route existing apps and share the the device. How realistic do you think this approach is? Juan Linietsky This what I first proposed, and i think it's a key factor.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] Audio routing issues for linux..

2002-06-10 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 09:52:10 +0100 Richard Bown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Juan Linietsky wrote: > > [developers choosing JACK over ALSA audio] > > > Not to be pessimistic, but I think such thing is not going to > > happen. Also I find the whole idea redund

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] Audio routing issues for linux..

2002-06-10 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 14:37:42 +0900 Patrick Shirkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Juan Linietsky wrote: > > > Probably the easier and more natural approach to this is just > > integrating JACK to ALSA in some way. > > > > What do you think? > > >

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Audio routing issues for linux..

2002-06-10 Thread Juan Linietsky
put in my roland mixing workstation?" Sure, I could go and write that, even ladspa suppport, but I think it's far from the optimium solution. I already have some plans for messing with the ALSA internals, but I dont have much time, so i'd rather ask first to the developers here, familiarized with the API about how real/crazy is my proposal ;) Regards Juan Linietsky

[linux-audio-dev] Poll about linux music audio app usability

2002-06-09 Thread Juan Linietsky
linux apps really take this windows approach of making huge bloated interfaces with lots of eye candy, or should we try to improve on making our apps intercommunicate between eachother, while still giving some importance to ease of use? What do you think about this issue? Juan Linietsky

[linux-audio-dev] Audio routing issues for linux..

2002-06-09 Thread Juan Linietsky
more natural approach to this is just integrating JACK to ALSA in some way. What do you think? Regards! Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] more about iiwusynth

2002-06-05 Thread Juan Linietsky
On 05 Jun 2002 20:11:55 -0600 Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 17:11, Juan Linietsky wrote: > > On 05 Jun 2002 05:09:17 -0600 > > Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > To LAD list members: > > > I'm

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Initial relase of Swami

2002-06-05 Thread Juan Linietsky
ourceforge.net > > Developers wanted :) > hey Josh! congratulations on this release! I've been waiting for it for a while now ;) The only thing i still dislike is iiwusynth being so incredibly slow :( Well, I'm downloading it! Cheers Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Ecasound frontend enquiry (and a bad link on Sound & MIDI page)

2002-05-21 Thread Juan Linietsky
s" is bad. > > Thanks > FT > there's ecawave i think, but i cant say i like it much. no clue about the url Regards Juan Linietsky

[linux-audio-dev] some problem.. muse skips on cpu load with my softsynth

2002-04-23 Thread Juan Linietsky
is muse's fault? (it's so widely used that i doubt about it), is it alsa sequencer's fault? or maybe i'm not doing something in saturno to ensure that the timing will work? Regards Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] SuperClonider

2002-04-22 Thread Juan Linietsky
go insane when i try to explain them how to install ALSA or configure it editing textfiles. (or maybe i'm just a debian user and have no idea about what kind of GUI tools are out there ;) Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Where is Masanao Izumo?

2002-04-21 Thread Juan Linietsky
ours i gave up) i couldnt figure out which controllers and rpn/nrpns has timidity implemented, could you let me know about it? I'd gladly make a doc and submit it to the project. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] SuperClonider

2002-04-21 Thread Juan Linietsky
have to release a new saturno somewhat soon with some of the missing stuff. werent you the author of the dx7 module for pd? if so, i'll let you know. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] MuSE 0.7 "EXODUS"

2002-04-19 Thread Juan Linietsky
geLog entry follows: > > > ahh man, i thought it was a release of MusE and got all happy http://muse.seh.de/ Same name is confusing :) Anyway this looks cool, i'll check it out! Cheers Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] best method for timing

2002-04-17 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:01:00 +0200 (CEST) Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Juan Linietsky wrote: > > >RTC is cool, but has the problem that only one program can use it > >at the same time. Do you know if there is any patch aviable to > >make RTC shareable?

Re: [linux-audio-dev] best method for timing

2002-04-16 Thread Juan Linietsky
he cycle counter? > I think he meant using it for measuring the time between calls, in unixes we have gettimeofday for this, but in windows there isnt really any way to do it, since there's no way to get high res timing beyond 10ms. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] best method for timing

2002-04-16 Thread Juan Linietsky
eable? I know RTC works by using int 8 in x86 and that high timings in a very old machine can hog the cpu due to the high amount of irq calls. But in the case of nowadays computers, i dont see why it should be a problem to have rtc enabled by default to the max speed and give each client frequencies based on divisors of it. regards. Juan Linietsky

Re: [linux-audio-dev] alsa midi device name extension proposal.

2002-03-31 Thread Juan Linietsky
On 27 Mar 2002 14:42:17 -0700 Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 22:29, Juan Linietsky wrote: > > Hello! i came up with this proposal for expanding the alsa midi api to > > support retrieving info regarding to patches/banks/controllers, It'

  1   2   >