On Friday 18 June 2004 12:35, Dave Phillips wrote:
> The European mirror of the Linux soundapps site is back online with a
> new address:
>http://linuxsound.atnet.at
> Please update your bookmarks.
> This site is now in sync with the US and Japanese sites.
There is still no link to h
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 01:36 am, Dave Phillips wrote:
> Greetings:
> ...
> For the time, the only completely current site for the Linux soundapps
> pages is now:
>
>http://linux-sound.org
An addition for the page of Wiki links: http://alsa.opensrc.org
--markc
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 09:57 am, Peter Eschler wrote:
> But providing the original Linn Drum samples wouldn't be a good idea
> either. As it was pointed out earlier the company is still in business and
> the drummachine will be renamed in the next release. So i will not package
> the original Linn Dr
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:55 am, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > One suggestion: I think it'd be useful to list what interfaces the app
> > supports, I know at least for me if it doesn't use jack it's basically
> > useless (and I'd rather find this out before downl
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 07:29 am, Tim Goetze wrote:
> Dominic Genest wrote:
> >Yes I am familiar with "mod" files which, more precisely, were born in the
> >Amiga world. Generally speaking, they're best at techno songs.
> >
> >Mine are rather "piano only", classical-like, songs. Those usually sound
> >
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 01:02 am, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > ... and, how would one go about doing this for pmidi, an
> > ALSA app that does not support the -D option ?
>
> pmidi plays MIDI events, not PCM data. You have to record the output
> of the synthesizer to get PCM data.
Right, so the synth o
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:42 pm, Mike Rawes wrote:
> > Are there tools to copy audio to a file as it goes through ALSA to the
> > soundcard? I'm basically looking for something like VSound, but for
> > everything, not just apps that can be coaxed to use OSS.
> Try putting this in ~/.asoundrc:
>
> pc
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:16 am, Daniel James wrote:
> > ...
> > But the last few months has seen a big increase in corporate
> > stakes in linux.
> I would say the last few years, but I take your point.
> > I beleive that the controversies are only just
> > beginning to be felt.
> Quite true - I'm h
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:31 pm, David Olofson wrote:
> ...
> Here's the problem: I'd like derived sounds to remain open source, but
> I'm not sure it makes sense to require it, like the LGPL does. The
> X11 license might be more sensible. What do you think?
There are a number of CC license variation
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 03:18 am, Maarten de Boer wrote:
> I just downloaded alsa 1.0.0rc2, and discovered that the API changed.
> For example (and this is only an example), take the function
> snd_pcm_hw_params_set_rate_near. Before, the 3th argument was the
> samplerate requested, and the return valu
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:27 pm, Hans Fugal wrote:
> As in, how do I share my own? What licenses or other scheme do you all
> use for music that you create and would like to be widely distributed,
> with or without any other restrictions. What considerations do you take
> into account?
Personally, I w
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002 16:45, Michael J McGonagle wrote:
> ...
> So, I have been considereing changing from using Mandrake (currently
> using 8.0) to using Debian. Does anyone have a success/horror stories
> from using Debian? How does their package installation utility compare
> to RPM?
I'm a biggot
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002 11:45, nixx wrote:
> > http://pkl.net/~node/software/alsa-patch-bay-0.1.tar.gz
> im having problems compiling under debian though :-/
Same here so I grabbed the 1mb source package and did a ./configure
to generate fltk-config, copied to the apb sourcedir and it generated an
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 03:07, Jussi Laako wrote:
> Joachim Backhaus wrote:
> > Yes, if for example Britney Spears says she uses Linux
> > for her album EVERYTHING would change!!! :D
>
> At least I would probably change to FreeBSD... :)
Please do. If you don't realize the importance and implications
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002 15:56, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> And really, there aren't many alternatives now
> are there are? So either be happy with OSS, help
> with ALSA or start your own...
There is one really obvious reason why this state of
affairs exists... ALSA is not yet officially part of
the kernel.
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 09:49, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> Well, I find it very easy to use Debian.
> But if this is your first encounter with Linux, that might not be the best
> idea ...
>
> I would recommend you the latest SuSE I think ...
Good call (most likely) and very sad, I'm a hardcore Debian
us
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 20:43, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> [OSS bashing and backwards compatibility]
or, desperately seeking ALSA and looking to the future!
> ok, guys, everybody hates OSS, *BUT*:
>
> * it is a common denominator among many unices, and it works well
> for trivial applications. think
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 05:11, Jussi Laako wrote:
> Mark Constable wrote:
> > Linux audio got screwed over by Linus allowing a semi-commercial
> > "product" to be embedded within the kernel 7 or so years ago. It
> > has taken this long for any adequate replacement t
Yet.
Has anyone got an idea of the schedule for including
ALSA into the devel kernel series ?
--markc
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 07:49, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Wow, you are a real LAD surviver, congrats :-)
> My thought is to develop a sound daemon that would be compatible with
> older apps using esd and artsd, based on alsa-server, with the
> efficiency of jack, and ability to share audio resource(s) with
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:49, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
> So what is preventing us from taking CoreAudio-like path and reworking
> the way audio is handled OS-wide? Is this just a gargantuan task or is
> it just lack of interest? No one said that we need to stick to the OSS
> standard established way befor
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 01:30, Taybin Rutkin wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, David Gerard Matthews Jr. wrote:
> > True enough. But I was thinking it would be handy if it started to show
> > up on recording devices like effects processors and digital consoles,
> > and thus would allow a direct connection
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001 03:36, Paul Davis wrote:
> it will never happen. even a 3 orders of magnitude increase in
> computing power (i.e. 2 TeraHz) wouldn't be enough to do full
> realtime physical modelling synthesis of a full orchestra.
That is perfectly true whilst the above is in action. Just be
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001 20:42, n++k wrote:
> [n++k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> ...
> | merci.
> |
> | sir you have no clue.
That is quite likely as I have only recently discovered the power
of using python and OpenGL (blows me away) and I'm hoping like crazy
to find something similar for sound ? If anyone
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001 02:40, Paul Davis wrote:
> >Huh, from a software engineering point of view they are distinctly
> >seperate tasks but from a human interface viewpoint the user is
> >"editing digital audio" where both aspects complete a whole picture,
> >or sound(s) in this case.
>
> i don't ag
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 11:23, Paul Davis wrote:
> > (sorry, not sure who should be attributed here)
> > But my main point is this -- out in the radio world, for one, a sound
> > editor and a multitracker are not necessarily different, and it would be
> > more than nice to have an integrated 'arbitra
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:42, Luis Pablo Gasparotto wrote:
> Is there some way to make SB Audigy work on Linux?
> Thank you very muc in advance.
> Luis Pablo Gasparotto
A huge "me too" to those in the know please.
If so, any comments on getting the firewire
connector to work as well ?
--markc
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 13:46, Kevin Conder wrote:
> I'm not trying to write a doctoral thesis so my process wasn't
> scientific. My information is based on informal conversations with friends
> and co-workers. Here is what I learned about how non-programmers use
> documentation:
Wow, that was
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:12, Paul Davis wrote:
> ...
> The problem is that the bookkeeping is based only on what the .spec
> file declares. Since this is never comparable to the kinds of tests
> that ./configure performs, the bookkeeping is inadequate as a way to
> test for compile or run-time prere
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:59, you wrote:
> Greetings Benno and others,
> Could you possibly post or email me your configuration files for alsa
> 0.9b5? I also have an SBlive and would like to use the most recent
> alsa, but have been a little intimidated in getting it set up. Thanks,
> dgm
A stro
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 01:25, you wrote:
> Please note that the ALSA emu10k1 driver still cannot handle large
> soundfonts. It's is purely due to the hardware limit - 32MB of PTB.
I like to do some work in this area... loading large
soundfonts. I'm aware there used to be a 32mb limit
in using shar
On Thursday 07 June 2001 01:00, you wrote:
> ...
> That's all for now. Now, booth participants, please reply to me directly
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) with the information I requested from you above.
> Anyone else, send your comments and suggestions to the list as usual.
Excellent effort Frank.
I'll
32 matches
Mail list logo
