> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 02:17:03AM -0500, rm wrote:
> > i looked around a bit and it seems like AMDTP/IEC61883-6 is starting
> > to be used and is in the linux 1394 drivers. it appears to include
> > multi-channel audio and midi which would be quite cool. (it also
> > appears not to be mlan).
>
>
Ouch!. My eyes started rolling within about 15 seconds...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Davis
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 6:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [linux-audio-dev] gui chrome
>
>
> y'all know i like chrom
ple out there
like me. Not that many have as much patience as I do, and Linux Audio is a
lot better technically than it is from a user's perspective.
Please don't take any of this as particularly negative, but really just as a
statement from someone who isn't a developer and is a full time user. Linux
Audio works, but it could work a lot better.
Cheers,
Mark Knecht
(With apologies to Frank for sharing a part of his name and being so dumb!)
;-)
Roman,
Another country heard from! Linux soft synths are really valuable tools,
and I've certainly glad to have another to start using. Thanks!
And I love the Reason-like cables that do the connections! ;-)
Cheers,
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAI
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 07:47, Frank Neumann wrote:
>
> Hi,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > I purchased Yamaha UX256 a few weeks ago (USB, 6xIn, 6xOut + "ToHost"
> > > connector). Works like a charm so far.
> > >
> > > Frank
> >
> > Cool. What's the 'ToHost' connector do?
>
> It's kind of an e
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 06:38, Frank Neumann wrote:
>
> Hi list,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Are there any multiport midi interfaces that work in Linux??
>
> I purchased Yamaha UX256 a few weeks ago (USB, 6xIn, 6xOut + "ToHost"
> connector). Works like a charm so far.
>
> Frank
Cool. What
MidiSport 2x2 - and probably the larger ones.
RME HDSP 9652 - sort of. They're working the bug out.
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 00:50, pawL wrote:
> Are there any multiport midi interfaces that work in Linux??
>
> pawL
;-) I wish you guys had carried this conversation on with a new title as I
think this has nothing at all to do with 1394. ;-)
Just so everyone else not conversing here is clear, the size of the packet
transmitted across the 1394 bus and the size of a Jack data block need have
nothing to do with ea
Like they say in those TV commercials...
"Sweet!"
Thanks Maarten!
Cheers,
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Maarten de
> Boer
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 5:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECT
I think this gentleman didn't really have the right structure to handle this
properly, but frankly I haven't read his whole paper yet. Jack, as it's
constituted today, and 1394, using some protocol tricks, are very compatible
in my mind.
Then there is standard mLAN which seems to at least work, so
Some folks here might find this of interest. I do...
http://www.cs.ru.ac.za/research/g99s2711/thesis/thesis-final.pdf
Cheers,
Mark
This synth gets better and better.
For those who haven't used it, it is amazingly deep in capabilities, and
really pretty free of major problems (in my experience) for such a new piece
of software.
You owe it to yourself to check it out.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike
> Andrews
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 8:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] newest audio server for Linux (yep, yet
> another)
>
> I'm the lead developer on the
Nasca,
Hi. I sent you a message before but didn't get a reply. I very much
like the sound of your synth, but I work in a Jack oriented environment.
When will you add Jack support? I hope you will.
Thanks,
Mark
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 10:01, Nasca Paul wrote:
> Hi.
> Today I relased ZynAddSubFX
Vishal,
I think there was some work done in the last few months on this.
Check the archives. I think Steve Harris was one of the participants. I
know they were working on modeling tubes, and I seem to remember someone
talking about playing their guitar through it.
Cheers,
Mark
On Fri, 2003-01-
e the jackstart output that goes to the F2
console and pipe it to a file that I could look at from KDE? That would be
nice too.
> -Original Message-
> From: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:38 AM
> To: Mark Knecht
&
>
> Would you care to describe your setup, hardware/kernel versions etc...?
>
Robert,
At the risk of looking like Steve's shadow, I run the PlanetCCRMA flow on
two machines. The low-end machine is an older Dell P3-500 with a Hammerfall
light and 768MB of DRAM. In that machine I run Jack with a -
Thanks Steve! Sounds like it's both fun and useful!
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve
> Harris
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:03 PM
> To: linux-audio-announce; Linux-audio-dev;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [linux-au
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 01:56, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 02:10:44 +1100, Conrad Parker wrote:
> > (one bit LADSPA sidechain proposal below ;)
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 09:21:38AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > >
> > >I mu
Steve,
Sorry for being dense on side-chain issues, but I've shied away from
using these specific plugins inside of Ardour since I seem incapable of
figuring out on my own how the side chain gets hooked up within that
application. Is this an Ardour issue, or am I just missing some simple piece
of
Thomas,
You might look into a Delta DiO 2496 card from M-Audio. Up front, I do
not know the Linux driver status of this card, so check that out also.
However, the card has both optical and coaxial s/pdif, supports TOSLink. It
lists for about $250, so I'd guess it's under $200 if you look around
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 16:51, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > Sounds like you might be up here in the Bay Area with me?
>
> Indeed - moving to SF proper next two weeks
>
> > > FUCK! I'm moving that weekend and I can't change it. Any other California
> > > folks?
> >
> > Yes, but don't know exactly how I
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 16:46, Josh Green wrote:
> Since we are mentioning living locations.. I'm in the foothills of the
> Sierras, about an hour east of Sacramento, CA.
> I was thinking recently, it would be cool to start up some sort of
> networking of Linux Audio folks, enthusiasts, phreaks, etc
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:54, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > If anyone can get to this, it would be a great idea. I might even
> > consider using a frequent flyer ticket for this. not sure yet.
>
>
> Hrrm, Anaheim is a 6 hour drive for me (Finally! Not being in Europe pays
> off!!)
Sounds like you might
Nacsa Paul,
Any plans to add Jack support to your synth?
Thanks,
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nasca Paul
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 2:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [linux-audio-dev] N
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Davis
> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 2:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [linux-audio-dev] rave + rant
>
>
> it really makes me feel good to be able to turn around and explain to
> my dis
Wayne,
Interesting ideas. I'm not a CSound user, but am a MIDI user. Any
thoughts about getting autocomp to generate MIDI output files also?
Those could then be loaded into my other sequencers and work with my
synths. Could be fun!
Good luck with your new project!
Cheers,
Mark
On Sun, 200
Paul,
Great info. I didn't know about modinfo. Is there a way to query what the
current setting of these parameters are? It seems that I'm told I have a
range to work in, like 1-8, but no indication of how they are currently set
or what they do. (Maybe only read the code?)
I'm sure that many
dsen,
Hi. I'm messing with similar things this evening. (And not doing
great, but not failing either.) I'm using a HDAP 9652, not the
Multiface, but it's the same driver I believe. The difference is I have
no 'headphone output'. Just 26 outputs.
I'm in KDE. Inside of a Konquerer window, I ha
. They all helped.
Cheers,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark
Knecht
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:36 AM
To: Paul Davis
Cc: D R Holsbeck; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PlanetCCRMA;
Ardour; Ardour-User-List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Ardour
riginal Message-
From: Paul Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:36 AM
To: Mark Knecht
Cc: D R Holsbeck; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PlanetCCRMA;
Ardour; Ardour-User-List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ardour-dev] Re: [linux-audio-dev] HDSP 9652 Users -
Request fo
lt-delete) and set it up again.
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 12:18, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
>I would like to request that if there are any users of the new RME HDSP
> 9652 card that are able to successfully install and use this card, would
you
> please get in touch with me and let me
Hi,
I would like to request that if there are any users of the new RME HDSP
9652 card that are able to successfully install and use this card, would you
please get in touch with me and let me know what your system configurations
are? I understand that there are at least a couple of you out there
Serves me right I suppose...
have a nice day...
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 11:28, Tim Hockin wrote:
> >I agree with your comments. I'd also like to see the developers at
> > least understand and consider these sorts of protocols also. In the end
> > something good will come out of it.
>
> We're n
Frank,
I agree with your comments. I'd also like to see the developers at
least understand and consider these sorts of protocols also. In the end
something good will come out of it.
Actually, the use of MIDI velocity information is a strong selling
point of GigaStudio. In GigaStudio you can
Frank,
Where would we find a list of decent MIDI ports? Or alternatively, a list
of interfaces with these known issues?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frank van
de Pol
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
To be clear, I was in no way suggesting that I thought Paul should change
his licensing terms in any way. I'm just interested in exploring the
underlying reasons why there are not more Linux applications available at
the retail level.
I personally think that this topic is interesting and
Paul,
Thanks you (very much actually) for the clarifications. They are
extremely helpful.
It's no wonder no one can make any money being in business of selling
Linux software applications.
I do not see how a company could afford to invest in this area, short of
staying closed-source. Ver
umbia.edu]On Behalf Of Taybin
Rutkin
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [linux-audio-dev] image problem
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Company A takes a copy of Ardour and forks it. They do their own GUI from
> scratch, maybe based
that's not really what i meant. anybody who has read this list over a
reasonably period of time or who conducts a rudimentary lookup on my
name using google will very rapidly get the impression that i'm
probably available for any consulting projects related to linux, audio
and MIDI. and indeed,
Tim,
It isn't my intention to flame you, but has anyone here actually read and
studied the patent? Have you? I haven't. Someone said they had a copy? Let's
hear a listing of what the actual patent claims are before we create a
defense.
I would guess that none of the technologies you mention
>In the spirit of full disclosure, I am not a lawyer, am a multiple
patent
> holder in the US and Japan (not sure about the EU) and am only speaking
from
> experience. My opinions are my own and do not represent any form of legal
> guidance.
Patent holder?? GET HIM! Good thing you didn't pos
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Simon
Jenkins
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Gigasampler vs Halion PR war
Does a patent get stronger if you're actually
Yep, this is what the whole Embedded Linux market is about, and the model
works in the audio area quite well. Look at DigiDesign with Pro Tools. Thee
isn't a reason that they couldn't offer PTLE here if they can offer it on OS
X, right?
Cheers,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECT
Len,
I agree with your point here, but do not understand the idea that "if
Linux audio developers had the time and inclination to offer their design
and/or consulting services" is getting in your way. Are you saying you can't
find developers to hire? Or are you saying you only want to hire them
Make a pretty picture like that and make the shapers compressors and then I
have a Waves C4, the best little end-of-the-line compressor around. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Steve
Harris
Sent: Monday, November
Steve,
Glad to see that you're releasing these. I've spent the bulk of my time
with SC2. It has worked well for me. I look forward to hearing of others
experiences with them and seeing these tools mature.
Thanks for your work!
Cheers,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul,
You are correct! I'm sorry. I went back and looked at the email I
received. He actually said you could buy two PCI cards and link them under
ASIO. My mistake. I'm was not at all attracted to that solution for the
obvious reasons of cost, syncing, heat and interrupts on more cards. Yuck.
And the DigiFace/MultiFace are very nice products. It was my understanding
from one of RME's vendors that at least under ASIO both the DigiFace and
MultiFace support multiple breakout boxes with a single PCI or cardbus
adapter card. I was keeping this in the back of my mind for the day when I
can d
I get to it just fine. Might have been down, or you might have a problem in
your current DNS server if they've recently changed IP addresses.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Richard
Bown
Sent: Friday, November 01, 20
, October 30, 2002 1:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] 'simsam' - a simple sampleplayer
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:55:59PM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Steve,
>What would the GUI look like for a jack-patch-bay app? Something like
> kaconnect with the abil
Steve,
What would the GUI look like for a jack-patch-bay app? Something like
kaconnect with the ability to choose where jack application outputs get
routed to? Just curious.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of S
Paul,
Thanks. Rhythmlab looks like fun. (Assuming I found the right one. I
actually ended up using Google since it didn't pop out at me on Dave's
pages.) Here's what I'm looking at:
http://www.enteract.com/~asl2/music/RhythmLab/#About . If this isn't the one
you're speaking of, please let me kno
Christian,
Hi. Cool. Congrats.
I've been thinking that we need a Linux app sort of like Battery from
Native Instruments. It strikes me that you are already a long way towards
that. Maybe you can look into what they do, and then as you do more coding
you could potentially grow a bit in that d
g VST or DirectX
plugins on Linux in real time
Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>Please remember - from my perspective this was all a joke anyway. (!!)
>
Ok, no harm done. Sorry if I seemed a bit harsh - didn;t realize it
was a joke. I have heard people propose that kind of stuff seriously.
-dgm
Steve
Hi. The input impedance of a real amp, along with the output impedance of
the pickups in the guitar, are actually quite sensitive to the loading of
the 1/4" cable going between the two. The volume control is a resistor,
essentially, so you've got an RLC circuit looking into the cable which
admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of David
Gerard Matthews
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Fwd: Opinions on running VST or DirectX
plugins on Linux in real time
Mark Knecht wrote:
>Possibly , but to install PTLE you must have PTLE hardwar
David,
There seems to have been some confusion about what I was implying.
Mark
**
Mark Knecht wrote:
>PTLE has it's own hardware. No one
>talks to it except Pro Tools.
>
Not true. I've run Digital Performer, MSP, Peak, and a few other
programs on PTLE
hardware. Un
Possibly , but to install PTLE you must have PTLE hardware in the system.
(At least using the default Windows installer from DigiDesign.) If you're
talking about some other method of installing, then I think you're just
pulling my leg back. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[m
Hi,
I haven't followed this thread all the way through, but it looks like
you're all having an interesting time on an interesting subject.
I record mostly through a Pod Pro these days. I've set up a number of my
own amp models. Having used the device for about a year, I'll point out that
(fo
Paul,
While I don't disagree with anything you say, I think you miss the point.
People come into the studio with PT sessions from other places. They want to
be able to continue to run them. Even if the hardware isn't that good (and
PTLE hardware isn't, but it isn't that bad either) it's good eno
PROTECTED]
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of David
Gerard Matthews
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Fwd: Opinions on running VST or DirectX
plugins on Linux in real time
Mark Knecht wrote:
>Taybin,
> So
Taybin,
So I may one day be able to run Acid Pro in wine and route audio to alsa?
That would be just too cool for words! ;-)
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-admin@;music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Kjetil S.
Matheussen
Sent: Wednesday, October 23,
All you freqtweak users.
Please come join the freqtweak mailing list. It's important that these
issues and ideas are captured in the archives for what is turning out to be
one of the most fun programs we've got around here.
Cheers,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ma
Jörn,
I did a little work on this file system choice a couple of weeks ago. My
results said stay away from ext3. I'm now using reiserfs.
There is a directory with some results on the same drive (different
partitions) using ext2, ext3 and reiserfs. ext3 and reiserfs also have data
on how ext
Jesse,
This looks like a lot of fun. If I wasn't having an open house in a hour,
I'd start trying to build it right now. (Let's see how it stands up to a
newbie like me trying to build it, right?!) ;-)
I had been looking at the NI tool and thinking about it. Now I get to
play in the right O
Ike,
GuitarPort looks like an interesting product. do you own one?
As a Pod Pro user I'm certainly interested in seeing more Line6 stuff
around here. WRT GuitarPort I have not seen discussion here in the last
couple of months that I've been around.
With best regards,
Mark
-Original Me
With a 3GHz Athlon, if Wine would talk to the hardware I'd just go that
way... ;-)
Another thing I was thinking... With a linux kernel patched for
seriously low latency, it should in theory be possible to write a
creamware SFP "emulator". It may not be practical concerning CPU cycles
but it shou
That's funny. I Asked the same question yesterday on another reflector. The
word right now seems to be no, but there is interest.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lea
Anthony
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
Steve,
The meters look good to me, but they're not moving yet... I think the
letters 'vu' could be a bit larger.
1) jackstart -R -d alsa -r 44100 -d Audigy &
2) meterbridge -t vu alsa_pcm:in_1 alsa_pcm:in_2 &
3) alsaplayer -o jack &
I think that alsa_pcm must be the wrong place in jack to
Hi,
I'm reading through the Alsa HOWTO and wondering if there are any buffer
setting or other options for setting internal buffer sizes in Alsa? I
normally set these things myself in jack, but in this case cannot.
One individual that I'm working with is getting excessive xruns on a
laptop.
Stefan,
I would think that known buffer sizes would be a reasonable approach.
MIDI data isn't that dense, assuming you're not recording or playing back
controller information. Notes, sustain pedals, program changes, etc. are
pretty minimal. You could probably just buffer that in a known sized b
72 matches
Mail list logo