Steve wrote:
> Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 16:39:02 +
> From: Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yeah, I'm thinking we're not tackling it right, if behringer can knock out
> a virtual amp harware box for E150 it can't the that cycle hungry.
There's a good chance I could get my hands on a Behringer
re: tube amp simulations for guitar...
from the music-dsp mailing list...
Just thought I'd mention that the upsampling/nonlinear
processing/decimation process that Line 6 performs was also descibed in Hal
Chamberlin's Musical Applications of Microprocessors (1985 edition), pg.
120:
"One modifica
> alsa, "properly linked" means either learning quite a lot about the
Now that's a nice Freudian slip :)
stuart
Okay, Paul's initial explanation and Lamar's comments make it (eq via delay
lines) fairly obvious in hindsight, thanks guys.
To switch topic a bit, I just came across "The Scientist and Engineer's
Guide to Digital Signal Processing" on the web - does anybody have any
comments about the quality o
its common practice to use FFT for real time EQ. its
> perfectly possible to use delay lines to accomplish high quality EQ
> with much lower latency than FFT. thats certainly what 90%+ of all
> VST/DirectX EQ plugins use (there was a discussion about this on
> vst-plugins recently)
&g
